Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter August 1, 2017

Conversion of Sugar to Fat: Is Hepatic de Novo Lipogenesis Leading to Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Chronic Diseases?

  • Jean-Marc Schwarz , Michael Clearfield and Kathleen Mulligan

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies suggest a link between excess sugar consumption and obesity, fatty liver disease, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. One important pathway that may link these metabolic diseases to sugar consumption is hepatic conversion of sugar to fat, a process known as de novo lipogenesis (DNL). Mechanistic studies have shown that diets high in simple sugars increase both DNL and liver fat. Importantly, removal of sugar from diets of children with obesity for only 9 days consistently reduced DNL and liver fat and improved glucose and lipid metabolism. Although the sugar and beverage industries continue to question the scientific evidence linking high-sugar diets to metabolic diseases, major health organizations now make evidence-based recommendations to limit consumption of simple sugars to no more than 5% to 10% of daily intake. Clear recommendation about moderating sugar intake to patients may be an important nonpharmacologic tool to include in clinical practice.

Although the sugar and beverage industries still try to question the scientific evidence linking high-sugar diets to metabolic diseases, health organizations, including the World Health Organization,1 the American Heart Association,2 and the US Department of Agriculture,3 have recently published evidence-based recommendations to limit the consumption of simple sugars to no more than 5% to 10% of daily caloric intake. Communicating clear recommendations about moderate sugar intake to patients is an important nonpharmacologic way to influence patients’ sugar intake.

Data from the US Department of Health and Human Services indicate that chronic diseases accounted for 86% of all health care spending in 2010.4 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that eliminating 3 risk factors—poor diet, inactivity, and smoking—would prevent 80% of heart disease and stroke cases, 80% of type 2 diabetes mellitus cases, and 40% of cancer cases.5 National health expenditures as a percentage of gross national product increased from 6.9% in 1970 to 17.5% in 2014 and are projected to continue to increase.5 Chronic diseases and conditions such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and arthritis are among the most costly and preventable of all health problems. Overall, clear nutritional and lifestyle recommendations, as well as effective approaches to confront this burden, are necessary if for no reason other than simple economics.

However, nutritional recommendations are not simple and, over the years, have at times been contradictory. The latest scientific report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC)3 raised debates and controversies, in particular with regard to fat and carbohydrate as sources of energy and their effects on health.6 Often, powerful food lobbyists reinterpret the latest scientific discoveries and pressure the DGAC to temper recommendations that may affect their financial interests.7 This long tradition was documented by Kearns et al in 2016.8 In addition, more rigorous research is needed to be able to articulate clear, evidence-based recommendations.

In the 1960s and 1970s, the American Heart Association recommended reductions in dietary fat, particularly saturated fat. This recommendation led to an increase in sugar consumption, including both sucrose (table sugar, which consists of 50% glucose and 50% fructose) and manufactured high-fructose corn syrup. However, studies by our group9-13 and others14,15 have demonstrated that increased consumption of sugar increases the rate of sugar-to-fat conversion by the liver, also called de novo lipogenesis (DNL). This conversion of sugar to fat generates saturated fat.

In this review, we present the growing evidence supporting our assertion that DNL may be an important hepatic pathway linking high sugar consumption to increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We focused on studies performed by our group at Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine-CA (TUCOM) and collaborators at the University of California, San Francisco and Davis locations. Other studies or reports included in this analysis were used to set the framework for our work and to clarify, support, elaborate on, or enhance the science.

Historical Perspective for a Role of Sugar in Obesity

The rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity most likely reflects changes in lifestyle, such as less activity, less outdoor time, and more sedentary behavior, or changes in nutrition, such as change in diet composition and associated increased intake, which may be exacerbated by genetic predisposition. Increased consumption of sugar and, more specifically, high-fructose corn syrup, is one of the strongest candidates.16 Findings from large cross-sectional studies in conjunction with those from well-powered prospective cohort studies with long periods of follow-up have shown a positive association between higher rates of soft drink consumption and caloric intake, weight gain, and obesity in both children and adults.17 Studies also suggest that high consumption of sugar is associated with a higher risk for hypertension and coronary heart diseases,18 metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes,19 and NAFLD.20

Despite the reported deleterious health effects of a high intake of fructose, the Corn Refiners Association has actively campaigned to emphasize that industrially produced high-fructose corn syrup is “natural” and “does not appear to contribute to obesity more than other caloric sweeteners.”21 Some meta-analyses claim that the detrimental effect of fructose and other sugars on lipid levels is confounded by the presence of positive energy balance and that without excess calories, sugar consumption does not lead to metabolic abnormalities.22

As far back as 2500 BCE, ancient Egyptians deliberately force-fed carbohydrates to birds to fatten them and to produce fatty liver, or foie gras. The biological significance of DNL in mammals remains controversial to this day. In 1860, German chemist Justus von Liebig was the first to postulate the conversion of sugar to fat. In the 1950s, P. Roy Vagelos, MD, and Salih J. Wakil, PhD, demonstrated that DNL was a cytosolic pathway completely distinct from mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation.15 At the time, because of technical limitations in the ability to quantitate DNL, it was believed to occur rarely in humans and to be a physiologically unimportant pathway.

In the 1990s, Hellerstein et al23 proposed a revolutionary stable isotope tracer method coupled with mass spectrometry and mathematical modeling that allowed investigators to noninvasively measure DNL in humans. Since that time, studies have demonstrated that high-sugar diets and hepatic DNL can increase the risk for elevated blood lipid levels, cardiovascular disease, NAFLD, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitis.24

Evaluating Dietary Fat and DNL

In healthy people consuming a low- or normal-carbohydrate diet, DNL measured in circulating very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides (VLDL-TG) is quantitatively minimal in the fasting state (<3% of VLDL-TG), but it increases approximately 10-fold in the postprandial state (20%-30% of VLDL-TG) because of the rise in lipogenic precursors that occurs after the consumption of a meal.25 In contrast, data have shown that fasting DNL is quantitatively statistically significant under the following conditions: (1) after 5 days of energy-balanced, high-carbohydrate feeding (65%-70% of calories; Figure 1) and (2) after 5 days of overfeeding with carbohydrate or fructose in excess of energy (Figure 2).26,27

Figure 1. 
          Fractional de novo lipogenesis (DNL) (%) after an overnight fast in normoinsulinemic lean participants on a high-fat/low-carbohydrate (CHO) (n=9) and low-fat/high-CHO diet with simple sugars (n=5) (P<.05).26
Figure 1.

Fractional de novo lipogenesis (DNL) (%) after an overnight fast in normoinsulinemic lean participants on a high-fat/low-carbohydrate (CHO) (n=9) and low-fat/high-CHO diet with simple sugars (n=5) (P<.05).26

Figure 2. 
          In both fasted and fed groups, fractional de novo lipogenesis (DNL) is significantly increased after 5 days carbohydrate overfeeding. Values not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P<.05).27
Figure 2.

In both fasted and fed groups, fractional de novo lipogenesis (DNL) is significantly increased after 5 days carbohydrate overfeeding. Values not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P<.05).27

These data demonstrate that fractional DNL is not detectable during caloric restriction but increases progressively to 20% in the fasting state and 30% to 35% in the fed state after 5 days of carbohydrate overfeeding. These studies also show that DNL is a very sensitive and specific marker of recent carbohydrate intake and energy balance and highlight the importance of considering the state of energy balance, in addition to carbohydrate intake, in studies of DNL.

In addition, these studies established that both isoenergetic and hypercaloric diets high in carbohydrates, especially fructose, are highly lipogenic and produce elevations in DNL that persist after an overnight fast. It should be noted, however, that carbohydrate-induced DNL appears to be specific to simple carbohydrates. Timlin and Parks25 demonstrated that when simple sugars are restricted and a diet high in complex carbohydrates (eg, starch) is consumed, DNL is trivial after an overnight fast.

Likewise, in the fed state, DNL is also determined by the type of simple sugar consumed. Fructose, but not glucose, increased hepatic DNL in 6 healthy lean participants (Figure 3).9 During 6 hours of fructose ingestion, DNL increased 20-fold, and 25% of circulating VLDL-TG was derived from DNL. In contrast, when the study was repeated in the same participants using glucose levels, rates of DNL were unaffected, and only 1% to 2% of VLDL-TG was synthesized de novo. These data demonstrate that fructose is a potent stimulus to lipogenesis.

Figure 3. 
          De novo lipogenesis (DNL) levels after oral fructose and oral glucose feeding. Oral carbohydrate was given every 30 min (300 mg/kg lean body mass) from hours 10 to 18.9
Figure 3.

De novo lipogenesis (DNL) levels after oral fructose and oral glucose feeding. Oral carbohydrate was given every 30 min (300 mg/kg lean body mass) from hours 10 to 18.9

Fructose metabolism is unique because, in contrast to glucose, it is metabolized almost exclusively in the liver, as its initial metabolism is hepatic. In contrast, glucose is predominantly metabolized in extrahepatic tissues, with the liver accounting for only 20% of glucose metabolism.14 Fructose is metabolized more rapidly than glucose, providing precursors, such as acetyl coenzyme A, for DNL. Animal studies have shown that fructose is converted to fatty acids at rates of up to 18.9 times faster than glucose14 and produces increased TG levels28 and liver fat.29 Overall, fructose is a potent lipogenic substrate in humans, and it significantly increases plasma TG levels.10,11

There is evidence that both hyperinsulinemia and a diet rich in simple sugars, by promoting DNL, contribute to hypertriglyceridemia and liver fat accumulation and, ultimately, to metabolic syndrome.30

Hyperinsulinemia, NAFLD, and Fasting Hepatic DNL

A large proportion of people with obesity or NAFLD have insulin resistance,31 and most people with insulin resistance have increased liver fat concentration.32 Fabbrini et al33 demonstrated that insulin resistance and other metabolic perturbations in obesity correlate better with liver fat than with visceral adipose tissue. In contrast to observations in healthy individuals, participants with insulin resistance and NAFLD have been found to have elevated rates of DNL in both the fasting and postprandial states (26% of VLDL-TG).34 Moreover, analysis of liver biopsy specimens collected from participants with NAFLD and chronically elevated DNL revealed that 26% of their liver fat was produced de novo,34 supporting the hypothesis that hepatic DNL may be an important contributor not only to postprandial lipids secreted by the liver but also to liver fat accumulation.

Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between hyperinsulinemia and DNL in the following conditions of hyperinsulinemia, in which fractional DNL is higher:

  • ■ Obese participants with hyperinsulinemia who were fed an isoenergetic high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet had a higher rate of DNL compared with weight-matched participants without hyperinsulinemia.30

  • ■ Patients with HIV, hyperinsulinemia, and abdominal fat accumulation who were fed a weight–maintaining diet also had higher hepatic DNL compared with healthy participants.35

  • ■ Critically ill, insulin-resistant patients fed enteral or parenteral diets varying in carbohydrate content had increased hepatic DNL.36-39 These studies demonstrated that in patients with insulin-resistance, fasting DNL is increased even under circumstances in which carbohydrate intake is limited, suggesting that hyperinsulinemia per se stimulates DNL. This finding was confirmed by a molecular study in rodents.40

Figure 4. 
          Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) measured after an overnight fast in lean and obese patients with normoinsulinemia compared with obese,11 critically ill,36-39 and HIV-positive35 patients with hyperinsulinemia. Levels of DNL were significantly higher in patients with hyperinsulinemia.
Figure 4.

Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) measured after an overnight fast in lean and obese patients with normoinsulinemia compared with obese,11 critically ill,36-39 and HIV-positive35 patients with hyperinsulinemia. Levels of DNL were significantly higher in patients with hyperinsulinemia.

Short-Term Fructose Feeding and Restriction

Study in Adult Men

A highly controlled metabolic ward study12 was conducted to test the hypothesis that short-term increases in hepatic DNL would be accompanied by detectable increases in liver fat concentration. The effects of a fructose-rich diet (25% of kilocalories) were compared with an isoenergetic diet containing the same macronutrient distribution but with low fructose (<4% of kilocalories) on liver fat concentration and hepatic DNL in healthy participants.12 Eight healthy men were studied as inpatients for 18 days to control energy balance and assure strict adherence to the diet, which was formulated and prepared by bionutritionists. The diets were given during consecutive 9-day periods. Four of the participants consumed the low-fructose diet first, and the other 4 started with the high-fructose diet. Fractional hepatic DNL during feeding was measured using stable isotope tracers and mass isotopomer distribution analyses. Liver fat concentration was measured on day 8 of each dietary period by magnetic resonance spectrometry on a 3-Tesla scanner.12

Given the aforementioned evidence that DNL can be acutely increased with hypercaloric feeding and decreased during hypocaloric feeding, weight was monitored daily and diets adjusted to carefully maintain a neutral energy balance. As a result, there were no net changes in weight or whole-body composition, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, during the study. After 8 days consuming the high-fructose diet, mean (SD) DNL during feeding was significantly higher with the low-fructose group (18.6% [1.4%] vs 11.0% [1.4%]; P=.001). Liver fat concentration was also higher during high-fructose feeding (median, 137% of values obtained during the low-fructose diet; P=.013). These differences were observed regardless of the order in which the diets were consumed.12 Hepatic glucose production, which is typically suppressed by high insulin levels, was not blunted by a high-fructose diet. This hepatic insulin resistance may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes. Hepatic glucose control can be restored by restricting added sucrose and fructose in one's diet.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that after as few as 8 days and in the presence of a neutral energy balance, a high fructose intake can increase both hepatic DNL and liver fat concentration. Perhaps most importantly, this study demonstrated that even short-term fructose restriction is associated with demonstrable reductions in DNL and liver fat concentration and provided the basis for a subsequent study of fructose restriction in children.

Study in Children

In an outpatient study13 in obese Latino and African American children with features of metabolic syndrome (eg, elevated triglycerides, insulin resistance, hypertension) who reported high levels of sugar intake, 9 days of fructose restriction with isocaloric substitution of complex carbohydrates resulted in reductions in fasting glucose and insulin levels, improved glucose tolerance,41 and less atherogenic lipoprotein profiles.42 Importantly, these same participants had a 56% decrease in DNL during feeding (n=40).13 Although the children in this study were not selected for the presence of liver fat concentration, approximately two-thirds of them had elevated liver fat concentration (>5% liver fat fraction by magnetic resonance spectroscopy). Overall, liver fat concentration decreased by 22% during fructose restriction.13 This study provides further evidence that carbohydrate quality, specifically fructose, plays an important role in liver fat accumulation and hypertriglyceridemia and that DNL is an important factor in these processes.

Beverage Industry Influence

For decades, the beverage industry and investigators sponsored by the industry have continued to mount vigorous and well-funded campaigns against public health policies intended to encourage limitation of soda and sugar consumption. Recent reports document that many institutions and respected academicians have received support from the beverage and sugar industry43 and have described the extensive efforts of industry groups to maintain control over the messages regarding sugar consumption and metabolic diseases.6,44 A 2016 publication8 strongly urges that policy-making committees should be cognizant of the bias that might be introduced by corporate sponsorship.

Clinical Implications

Efforts to reverse the obesity epidemic in the United States have been largely unsuccessful. While the rate of obesity continues to increase globally, there is a growing body of literature demonstrating how lifestyle and dietary interventions can have a profound effect. Many obese people seem to be mired in the fact that the management of obesity is long and very difficult. The present review details data demonstrating that changing the dietary intake of fructose can significantly reduce DNL and its unhealthy metabolic sequelae in as little as 9 days and, furthermore, this benefit can occur even without any loss of weight. This finding allows us, as health care professionals, to reframe the discussion from weight loss to attaining better health in just a week and a half. To quote Andrew Taylor Still, MD, DO,45 “To find health should be the object of the doctor. Anyone can find disease.” These studies can be used to help explain to our patients the rationale as to why they should follow the most recent dietary recommendations to limit simple sugars to no more than 5% to 10% of their daily intake. Should patients adhere to these recommendations, it may well be the first step to facilitate their body to self-regulate, self-heal, and begin its return to a state of health maintenance.

Conclusion

There is increasing evidence from both epidemiologic and interventional studies of the deleterious effects of consuming sugar-sweetened beverages and other foods containing fructose and other added sugars, even in the absence of weight gain. Chronically elevated DNL during both fasting and feeding may be a key mechanism in the link between consumption of added sugar and metabolic abnormalities, including obesity, high lipid levels, cardiovascular disease, NAFLD, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes.


From the Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine-CA in Vallejo (Drs Schwarz, Clearfield, and Mulligan) and the University of California, San Francisco (Drs Schwarz and Mulligan).
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
Support: This article was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-DK089216, R01-DK078133, R01-HL113887), the American Diabetes Association (1-08-CR-56), the University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NCATS–UL1-TR00004), and the Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine-CA.

*Address correspondence to Jean-Marc Schwarz, PhD, Touro University, 1310 Club Dr, Vallejo, CA 94592-1187. E-mail:


Acknowledgment

We thank Moises Velasco-Alin, BS, for valuable assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.

References

1. Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children . Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

2. Johnson RK , AppelLJ, BrandsM, et al; American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation.2009;120(11):1011-1020. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidlines for Americans. 8th ed. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, US Dept of Agriculture; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. Gerteis J , IzraelD, DeitzDet al.Multiple Chronic Conditions Chartbook: 2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data. Washington, DC: Dept of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mensah G. Global and Domestic Health Priorities: Spotlight on Chronic Disease. National Business Group on Health Webinar. May 23, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

6. Sanders TA . How important is the relative balance of fat and carbohydrate as sources of energy in relation to health?Proc Nutr Soc.2016;75(2):147-153. doi:10.1017/S0029665115004188Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Nestle M. Conflicts of interest in the regulation of food safety: a threat to scientific integrity. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2036-2038. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9158Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kearns CE , SchmidtLA, GlantzSA. Sugar industry and coronary heart disease research: a historical analysis of iInternal industry documents.JAMA Intern Med.2016;176(11):1680-1685. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5394Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Hellerstein MK , SchwarzJM, NeeseRA. Regulation of hepatic de novo lipogenesis in humans.Ann Rev Nutr.1996;16:523-557. doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.002515Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Faeh D , MinehiraK, SchwarzJ-M, et al.Effect of fructose overfeeding and fish oil administration on hepatic de novo lipogenesis and insulin sensitivity in healthy men.Diabetes. 2005;54(7):1907-1913.10.2337/diabetes.54.7.1907Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Stanhope K , SchwarzJ-M, KeimN, et al.Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans.J Clin Invest.2009;119(5):1322-1334. doi:10.1172/JCI3738510.1172/JCI37385Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Schwarz J-M , NoworolskiSM, WenMJ, et al.Effect of a high-fructose weight-maintaining diet on lipogenesis and liver fat.J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2015;100(6):2434-2442. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3678.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Schwarz J-M , NoworolskiSM, Erkin-CakmakA, et al. Effects of dietary fructose restriction on liver fat, de novo lipogenesis, and insulin kinetics in children with obesity [published online ahead of print June 1, 2017]. Gastroenterology. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.043Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Mayes PA . Intermediary metabolism of fructose.Am J Clin Nutr.1993;58(5 suppl):754S-765S.10.1093/ajcn/58.5.754SSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Hudgins LC , ParkerTS, LevineDM, HellersteinMK. A dual sugar challenge test for lipogenic sensitivity to dietary fructose.J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2011;96(3):861-868.10.1210/jc.2010-2007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Bray GA , NielsenSJ, PopkinBM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity [published correction appears in Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):1090]. Am J Clin Nutr.2004;79(4):537-543.10.1093/ajcn/79.4.537Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Malik VS , SchulzeMB, HuFB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.Am J Clin Nutr.2006;84(2):274-288.10.1093/ajcn/84.2.274Search in Google Scholar

18. Xi B , HuangY, ReillyKH, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of hypertension and CVD: a dose-response meta-analysis.Br J Nutr. 2015;113(5):709-717. doi:10.1017/S0007114514004383Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Richelsen B. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardio-metabolic disease risks. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16(4):478-484. doi:10.1097/MCO.0b013e328361c53eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Jin R , VosMB. Fructose and liver function–is this behind nonalcoholic liver disease?Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care.2015;18(5):490-495. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000203Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Corn Refiners Applaud American Medical Association Decision on High Fructose Corn Syrup [press release]. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; June 19, 2008. https://corn.org/ama-decision-on-hfcs/. Accessed July 7, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

22. Chiavaroli L , de SouzaRJ, HaV, et al.Effect of fructose on established lipid targets: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials.J Am Heart Assoc.2015;4(9):e001700. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001700Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Hellerstein MK , ChristiansenM, KaempferS, et al.Measurement of de novo hepatic lipogenesis in humans using stable isotopes. J Clin Invest. 1991;87(5):1841-1852. doi:10.1172/JCI115206Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Herman MA , Samuel VT. The sweet path to metabolic demise: fructose and lipid synthesis.Trends Endocrinol Metab.2016; 27(10):719-730. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2016.06.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Timlin MT , ParksEJ. Temporal pattern of de novo lipogenesis in the postprandial state in healthy men.Am J Clin Nutr.2005;81(1):35-42.10.1093/ajcn/81.1.35Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Schwarz J-M , LinfootP, DareD, AghajanianK.Hepatic de novo lipogenesis in normoinsulinemic and hyperinsulinemic subjects consuming high-fat, low-carbohydrate and low-fat, high-carbohydrate isoenergetic diets.Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(1):43-50.10.1093/ajcn/77.1.43Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Schwarz J-M , NeeseRA, TurnerS, DareD, HellersteinMK. Short-term alterations in carbohydrate energy intake in humans. Striking effects on hepatic glucose production, de novo lipogenesis, lipolysis, and whole-body fuel selection.J Clin Invest.1995;96(6):2735-2743. doi:10.1172/JCI118342Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Thorburn AW , StorlienLH, JenkinsAB, KhouriS, KraegenEW. Fructose-induced in vivo insulin resistance and elevated plasma triglyceride levels in rats.Am J Clin Nutr.1989;49(6):1155-1163.10.1093/ajcn/49.6.1155Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Jurgens H , HaassW, CastanedaTR, et al.Consuming fructose-sweetened beverages increases body adiposity in mice.Obes Res.2005;13(7):1146-1156. doi:10.1038/oby.2005.136Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Parks EJ , KraussRM, ChristiansenMP, NeeseRA, HellersteinMK. Effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on VLDL-triglyceride assembly, production, and clearance.J Clin Invest.1999;104(8):1087-1096. doi:10.1172/JCI6572Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Willner IR , WatersB, PatilSR, ReubenA, MorelliJ, RielyCA. Ninety patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: insulin resistance, familial tendency, and severity of disease.Am J Gastroenterol.2001;96(10):2957-2961. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04667.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Bugianesi E , McCulloughAJ, MarchesiniG.Insulin resistance: a metabolic pathway to chronic liver disease. Hepatology.2005;42(5):987-1000. doi:10.1002/hep.20920Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Fabbrini E , MagkosF, MohammedBS, et al.Intrahepatic fat, not visceral fat, is linked with metabolic complications of obesity.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2009;106(36):15430-15435. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904944106Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Donnelly KL , SmithCI, SchwarzenbergSJ, JessurunJ, BoldtMD, ParksEJ. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.J Clin Invest.2005;115(5):1343-1351. doi:10.1172/JCI23621Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Schwarz J-M , MulliganK, LeeJ, et al. Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on hepatic lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in HIV-infected patients with fat accumulation.J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2002;87(2):942. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.2.8391Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Schwarz JM , ChioleroR, RevellyJP, et al.Effects of enteral carbohydrates on de novo lipogenesis in critically ill patients.Am J Clin Nutr.2000;72(4):940-945.10.1093/ajcn/72.4.940Search in Google Scholar

37. Minehira K , Tappy L, ChioleroR, et al.Fractional hepatic de novo lipogenesis in healthy subjects during near-continuous oral nutrition and bed rest: a comparison with published data in artificially fed, critically ill patients.Clin Nutr.2002;21(4):345-350.10.1054/clnu.2002.0559Search in Google Scholar

38. Tappy L , SchwarzJ-M, SchneiterP, et al. Effects of isoenergetic glucose-based or lipid-based parenteral nutrition on glucose metabolism, de novo lipogenesis, and respiratory gas exchanges in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med.1998;26(5):860-867.10.1097/00003246-199805000-00018Search in Google Scholar

39. Tappy L , BergerM, SchwarzJ-M, et al. Hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism in intensive care patients receiving continuous high- or low-carbohydrate enteral nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1999;23(5):260-267. doi:10.1177/0148607199023005260Search in Google Scholar

40. Shimomura I , MatsudaM, HammerRE, BashmakovY, BrownMS, GoldsteinJL. Decreased IRS-2 and increased SREBP-1c lead to mixed insulin resistance and sensitivity in livers of lipodystrophic and ob/ob mice.Mol Cell. 2000;6(1):77-86.10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00010-9Search in Google Scholar

41. Lustig RH , MulliganK, NoworolskiSM, et al.Isocaloric fructose restriction and metabolic improvement in children with obesity and metabolic syndrome.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(2):453-460.10.1002/oby.21371Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Gugliucci A , LustigRH, CaccavelloR, et al.Short-term isocaloric fructose restriction lowers apoC-III levels and yields less atherogenic lipoprotein profiles in children with obesity and metabolic syndrome.Atherosclerosis.2016;253:171-177. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Aaron DG , SiegelMB. Sponsorship of national health organizations by two major soda companies.Am J Prev Med.2017;52(1):20-30. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. List of health professionals and scientific experts. Coca-Cola Journey website. http://transparency.coca-colacompany.com/health-professionals-and-scientific-experts. Accessed June 5, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

45. Still AT . Philosophy of osteopathy.OsteoLib. 1899;1a:28.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-18
Accepted: 2017-01-11
Published Online: 2017-08-01
Published in Print: 2017-08-01

© 2017 American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 26.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2017.102/html
Scroll to top button