Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.
Why did precarious and collapsed democracies in Europe develop into highly stable democracies? Gerard Alexander offers a rational choice theory of democratic consolidation in a survey of the breakdowns of and transitions to democratic institutions. Through an analysis of developments in Spain, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, Alexander explores how key political sectors established the long-term commitment to democracy that distinguishes consolidated democracies. Alexander makes a highly accessible rationalist argument about the conditions under which such commitments emerge, arguing that powerful sectors abandon options for overthrowing democratic rules only when they predict low risks in democracy. The author's argument parallels established claims about the predictability essential to the development of modern capitalism. The Sources of Democratic Consolidation outlines Alexander's claim that a political precondition, rather than an economic or social precondition, exists for consolidated democracies. Drawing on interviews and archival research, the author links his argument to evidence from the five largest countries in Western Europe from the 1870s to the 1980s and also discusses the implications for the prospects for democratic consolidation in other regions. Political pacts, power-sharing, and institutional designs, he says, may help stabilize uncertain democracies, but they cannot create consolidation.
Alexander Gerard :
Gerard Alexander is Associate Professor of Politics at the University of Virginia.
Margaret Levi, Bacharach Professor of International Studies, University of Washington:
"Alexander takes on one of the important issues in the contemporary world: the transformation of failed regimes into stable democracies. His analytical sophistication is a model of social science. His approach provides answers to ongoing puzzles about the political and economic success of so many countries in Europe, and it offers guidance to understanding development worldwide."
Gianfranco Pasquino, University of Bologna:
"Alexander has written a remarkable book that challenges some received wisdoms. Theoretically innovative, founded on solid research and much incontrovertible evidence, The Sources of Democratic Consolidation is a real and significant contribution to the existing literature. Indeed, it does so by going well beyond most of this literature."
Eddie Hyland, Trinity College Dublin:
"This is an important work that should be of interest to everyone working in the field of democratic transition and consolidation."
Christopher Kam, University of South Carolina:
"This book... should command a wide audience. Students of democratization and Western European politics will find it a useful addition to their libraries. Indeed, it would also be a useful book to assign in graduate seminars on research design and comparative politics. The Sources of Democratic Consolidation nicely illustrates the strengths and limitations of the rational choice approach to comparative politics."
"Despite the author's intention, he has produced a book of social science that turns into a fine rehabilitation of history."
J. M. Scolnick, Jr.:
"Alexander offers an excellent contribution to the literature examining how and why new democracies become consolidated. In essence, the author argues persuasively the genuine consolidation occurs only when powerful segments of society have become convinced that their opponents will predictably refrain from using democratic rules to seriously harm their core assets or values."
Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.