Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 11, 2017

L’antilogicien ou l’ennemi de la philosophie véritable

  • Geneviève Lachance EMAIL logo
From the journal Elenchos

Abstract

One of Plato’s goal in the Phaedo is not only to define what philosophy is, but also to describe what ‘real’ or ‘authentic’ philosophy consists of. This description of ‘authentic’ philosophy reveals a tension. Indeed, if Socrates feels the need to speak of a genuine philosophy, is it not a sign that there is another type of philosophy, which is inauthentic and fake ? If Plato emphasizes the legitimacy of some philosophers, is it not because he believes that there are others, who resemble the former but are a mere imitation of them ? In fact, there is in the Phaedo an implicit description of ‘false’ philosophers, which culminates with the presentation of a precise case: the antilogician. Sometimes called a sophist, often described as an eristic, the antilogician is a perfect example of philosophy gone wrong. Criticised more than once in his dialogues, Plato condemns vivaciously the antilogician as he diverts real philosophical inquiry and immerses people in absolute relativism.

Références

Blank, D. L. 1986. « Socrates’ Instructions to Cebes : Plato, Phaedo 101 d-e », Hermes 114 (2), 146–163.Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. 1955. Phaedo, London, Routledge & Kegan Pau. Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 1986. Plato’s Phaedo, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 1991. Platon. Phédon, Paris, GF Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. 2009. « Dissoi Logoi » in Les Sophistes, tome II, édité par J.-F. Pradeau, Paris, GF Flammarion, 125–131.Search in Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. 2010. Xénophon. Mémorables I, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Dorter, K. D. 1982. Phaedo. An Interpretation, Toronto, Toronto University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gallop, D. 1975. Phaedo, Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00249988Search in Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. 1955. Phaedo, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Socratic Movement, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, T. 2015. « Socrates’ Warning Against Misology (Plato, Phaedo 88c-91c) », Phronesis 60, 145–179.10.1163/15685284-12341282Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, T. M. 1979. Contrasting Argument: An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi, Salem, N. H. Ayer.Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. 1993. Plato. Phaedo, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stough, C. 1976. « Forms and Explanation in the Phaedo », Phronesis 21, 1–30.10.1163/156852876X00011Search in Google Scholar

Vicaire, P. 1983. Platon. Phédon, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, T. 2008. « Misology and Truth », in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. XXII, édité par J. J. Cleary et G. M. Gurtler, Leiden, Brill, 1–16.10.1163/22134417-90000089Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-12-11
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/elen-2017-0003/html
Scroll to top button