Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 24, 2018

Epicurean Dreams

  • Voula Tsouna EMAIL logo
From the journal Elenchos

Abstract

Most ancient philosophers accept that dreams have prophetic powers enabling humans to relate somehow to a world beyond their own. The only philosophers known to make a clean and explicit break with that tradition are the Epicureans, beginning with Epicurus himself and reaching his last eminent follower, Diogenes of Oinoanda. They openly reject the idea that dreams mediate between the divine and the human realms, or between the world of the living and the world of the dead. They demystify the phenomenon of dreaming by explaining sleeping and dreaming in terms of their materialistic physical theory. Importantly, they examine dreams and their content from different perspectives and explore their relevance to our lives. The general aim of this paper is to offer a synthetic account of the Epicurean view about dreaming and dreams, advance certain new hypotheses that seem worthy of consideration, and show how Epicurus and his followers integrate dream theory into their philosophy as a whole.

References

Asmis, E. 1981. “Lucretius’ Explanation of Moving Dream Figures at 4.768-76”, American Journal of Philology 102, 138‒145.10.2307/294304Search in Google Scholar

Brillante, C. 1991. Studi sulla rappresentazione del sogno nella Grecia antica, Palermo, Sellerio Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Cavini, W. 2009. “Phantasma: L’immagine onirica come apparenza illusoria nel pensiero greco del sogno”, Medicina nei secoli. Arte e Scienza / Journal of History of Medicine 21, 737–772.Search in Google Scholar

Clay, D. 1980. “An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams”, The American Journal of Philology 101, 342‒365. Reprinted in D. Clay, Paradosis and Survival. Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1988, 211‒231.10.2307/294276Search in Google Scholar

Corti, A. 2015. “Ὁμοιοσχήμων e ὁμοιόμορϕος. Alcune riflessioni sulle proprietà degli εἴδωλα”, in Masi‒Maso 2015, 83‒105.Search in Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. 1994. “Lucrezio, de rer. nat. IV 984: voluntas o voluptas? Una difficoltà testuale e l’interpretazione epicureo-lucreziana del fenomeno onirico”, Studi italiani di filologia classica 12, 50‒102, 208‒253.Search in Google Scholar

Essler, H. 2011. Glückselig und unsterblich. Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero und Philodem, Basel, Schwabe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. 2015. “L’âme défaite: la théorie du sommeil dans l’Épicurisme”, in Le sommeil. Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, ed. by V. Leroux, N. Palmieri and C. Pigne, Paris, Honoré Champion, 85‒96.Search in Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. 2017. “Diogène, Lucrèce et la théorie épicurienne de l’imaginaire. Fragment 9 - De rerum natura IV 971-993”, in Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicureanism and Philosophical Debates / Diogène d’Oenoanda. Épicurisme et Controverses, ed. by J. Hammerstaedt, P.-M. Morel, and R. Güremen, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 207‒220.Search in Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. (forthcoming). “Les Épicuriens et la vérité des rêves”.Search in Google Scholar

Gladman, K., Mitsis, P. 1997. “Lucretius on the Unconscious”, in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Proceedings of the Colloquium of Amsterdam 26-28 June 1996, ed. by K. Algra, M.H. Koenen, and P. Schrijvers, Amsterdam et al., Koninkligke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 215‒224.Search in Google Scholar

Güremen, R. 2017. “Diogenes of Oinoanda and the Epicurean Epistemology of Dreams”, in Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicureanism and Philosophical Debates / Diogène d’Oenoanda. Épicurisme et Controverses, ed. by J. Hammerstaedt, P.-M. Morel, and R. Güremen, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 187‒206.Search in Google Scholar

Holowchak, M. A. 2004. “Lucretius on the Gates of Horn and Ivory: A Psychophysical Challenge to Prophecy and Dreams”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 42, 355‒368.10.1353/hph.2004.0067Search in Google Scholar

Konstan, D. 2011. “Epicurus on the Gods”, in Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, ed. by J. Fish and K.R. Sanders, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, 53‒71.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, G. 2002. “Epicuro, Della Natura: libro XXXIV, PHerc. 1431”, Cronache Ercolanesi 32, 7‒135.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, G. 2012. Epicuro, Sulla Natura: libro II, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. A., Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808050Search in Google Scholar

Masi, F. G. 2015. “Dagli occhi alla mente: il cammino tortuoso degli εἴδωλα”, in Masi‒Maso 2015, 107‒134.Search in Google Scholar

Masi, F. G. (forthcoming). “Lucrezio e l’inganno onirico”.Search in Google Scholar

Masi, F. G., Maso, S. 2015. (eds.) Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Physeos Book II. Updates, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam, Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar

McCurdy, H. G. 1947. “The History of Dream Theory”, Psychological Review 53, 225‒233.10.1037/h0062107Search in Google Scholar

Piergiacomi, E. 2017. Storia delle antiche teologie atomiste, Roma, Sapienza Università Editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Pigeaud, J. 1981. “Le rêve érotique dans l’Antiquité gréco-romaine: l’oneirogmos”, Littérature, Médecine, Société (Université de Nantes) 3, 10‒23.Search in Google Scholar

Schrijvers, P. H. 1976. “La pensée d’Épicure et de Lucrèce sur le sommeil (DRN IV, 907-961 et scholie ad Épicure, Ep. ad Her. 66): un chapitre des Parva Naturalia épicuriens”, in Études sur l’épicurisme antique, ed. by J. Bollack, A. Laks, Lille, Publications de l’Université de Lille III, 229‒259.Search in Google Scholar

Schrijvers, P. H. 1999. “Die Traumtheorie des Lukrez”, in Lucrèce et les sciences de la vie, Suppl. Mnemosyne, ed. by P. H. Schrijvers, Leiden, Brill, 146‒166.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 2011. “Epicurus’ Theological Innatism”, in Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, ed. by J. Fish and K. R. Sanders, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, 29‒52.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. 2016. “Epicurean Preconceptions”, Phronesis 61, 160‒221.10.1163/15685284-12341304Search in Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. forthcoming 2019. “The Epicureans on Technê and the Technai”, in Technê in Ancient Philosophy, ed. by T. K. Johansen, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2015. “Monismo psicologico e dottrina dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio”, in Anima-corpo alla luce dell’etica: Antichi e moderni, a cura di E. Canone, Firenze, Olschki, 49‒64.Search in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2017a. “Accio, Lucrezio et la psicologia di Epicuro: Osservazioni su Trag. 296R. (589 Dangel)”, Museum Helveticum 74, 158‒171.Search in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2017b. “Gli Epicurei e la psicologia di Epicuro”, in Studi su ellenismo e filosofia romana, a cura di F. Alesse, A. Fermani, S. Maso, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 33‒64.Search in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2017c. “Percezione, errore e residuo percettivo in Aristotele, Epicuro e Alessandro di Afrodisia”, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana, Serie 7, 12, 44‒62.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-24
Published in Print: 2018-11-30

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/elen-2018-0015/html
Scroll to top button