Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 18, 2013

A Comparison of Monomeric Phenols Produced from Lignin by Fast Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Conversions

  • Lin Du , Ze Wang , Songgeng Li EMAIL logo , Wenli Song and Weigang Lin

Abstract

Lignin, a by-product in biorefining industries such as lignocellulose-to-ethanol and paper-making processes, is a promising renewable source for value-added phenolic chemicals. Hydrothermal conversion and fast pyrolysis are two main thermo-chemical approaches for depolymerization of lignin. Hydrothermal conversion is a low temperature (250–500°C) and high pressure (5–30 MPa) process particularly suited for high moisture materials, whereas fast pyrolysis takes place at atmospheric pressure and moderate temperatures in the absence of oxygen and requires drying of the feedstock. In this paper, we present experimental results that provide a comparison of distributions of monomeric phenols produced by fast pyrolysis and hydrothermal conversion of lignin. Hydrothermal conversion experiments were performed in a 150 ml autoclave at 300°C for 30 minutes with different alkaline concentrations. Pyrolysis was carried out in a spouted bed reactor at 500°C. Hydrothermal conversion of lignin under 1 M alkaline solutions resulted in lower char yields (12.1%) compared to fast pyrolysis, which resulted in 54.5% solid yields. Monomer phenols obtained from hydrothermal conversion of lignin were found to have a narrower distribution dominated by catechol and its methyl derivative. In contrast, fast pyrolysis produced a wider distribution of monomeric phenols dominated by guaiacol and its derivatives with various chains substituted para to the hydroxyl group. Mechanisms of lignin fast pyrolysis and the methoxy group conversion under hydrothermal conditions were proposed respectively. In conclusion, hydrothermal technology is better suited for production of value added monomer phenols from lignin.

Acknowledgment

The financial support from the joint project sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shenhua Group Corporation Limited (Grant No.51174284) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] KammB, KammM.Principles of biorefineries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2004;64:13745.10.1007/s00253-003-1537-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] SarkanenKV, LudwigCH. Lignins: occurrence, formation, structure and reactions. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

[3] JiangGZ, NowakowskiDJ, BridgwaterAV. Effect of the temperature on the composition of lignin pyrolysis products. Energy Fuels2010;24:44705.10.1021/ef100363cSearch in Google Scholar

[4] de WildP, Van der LaanR, KloekhorstA, HeeresE. Lignin valorisation for chemicals and (transportation) fuels via (catalytic) pyrolysis and hydrodeoxygenation. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy2009;28:4619.10.1002/ep.10391Search in Google Scholar

[5] MullenCA, BoatengAA. Catalytic pyrolysis-GC/MS of ligninfrom several sources. Fuel Process Technol2010;91:144658.10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.022Search in Google Scholar

[6] ZhaoY, DengL, LiaoB, FuY, GuoQ-X. Aromatics production via catalytic pyrolysis of pyrolytic lignins from bio-oil. Energy Fuels2010;24:573540.10.1021/ef100896qSearch in Google Scholar

[7] ZakzeskiJ, WeckhuysenBM. Lignin solubilization and aqueous phase reforming for the production of aromatic chemicals and hydrogen. ChemSusChem2011;4:36978.10.1002/cssc.201000299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] ShabtaiJS. Process for converting lignins into a high octane additive. US 2003/0100807 A1.Search in Google Scholar

[9] SaisuM, SatoT, WatanabeM, AdschiriT, AraiK. Conversion of lignin with supercritical water−phenol mixtures. Energy Fuels2003;17:9228.10.1021/ef0202844Search in Google Scholar

[10] VigneaultA, JohnsonDK, ChornetE. Base-catalyzed depolymerization of lignin: separation of monomers. Can J Chem Eng2007;85:90616.10.1002/cjce.5450850612Search in Google Scholar

[11] DerkachevaO, SukhovD. Investigation of lignins by FTIR spectroscopy. Macromol Symp2008;265:618.10.1002/masy.200850507Search in Google Scholar

[12] KaragözS, BhaskarT, MutoA, SakataY, UddinMA. Low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of biomass: effect of reaction parameters on products and boiling point distributions. Energy Fuels2003;18:23441.10.1021/ef030133gSearch in Google Scholar

[13] FaixO. Classification of lignins from different botanical origins by Ft-Ir spectroscopy. Holzforschung1991;45:217.10.1515/hfsg.1991.45.s1.21Search in Google Scholar

[14] PiskorzJ, ScottDS, RadleinD. Composition of oils obtained by fast pyrolysis of different woods. In Pyrolysis oils from biomass: producing, analysing, and upgrading, edited by SoltesJ, MilneTA. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1988:376, 16778.Search in Google Scholar

[15] AdlerE. Lignin chemistry – past, present and future. Wood Sci Technol1977;11:169218.10.1007/BF00365615Search in Google Scholar

[16] ParthasarathiR, RomeroR, RedondoA, GnanakaranS. Theoretical study of the remarkably diverse linkages in lignin. J Phys Chem Lett2011;2:26606.10.1021/jz201201qSearch in Google Scholar

[17] YangH, YanR, ChenH, ZhengC, LeeDH, LiangDT. In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuels2006;20:38893.10.1021/ef0580117Search in Google Scholar

[18] CaballeroJA, FontR, MarcillaA. Pyrolysis of Kraft lignin: yields and correlations. J Anal Appl Pyrol1997;39:16183.10.1016/S0165-2370(96)00965-5Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-06-18

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2012-0085/html
Scroll to top button