Abstract
In spite of the apparent differences between the two, a number of commentators have suggested an underlying sympathy between new atheism and protestant fundamentalism (e.g. De Botton 2012; Vernon 2007; Flew 2007; Robertson 2010) While such comparisons are intriguing, it not always clear whether they should be taken seriously, as they are frequently asserted without sustained argument. This paper seeks to ameliorate this lack of clarity through a textual study of new atheist and protestant fundamentalist texts. This textual study reveals two presuppositions shared by new atheists and protestant fundamentalists: a literal, univocal, and perspicuous understanding of Scripture, and a disruptive and substitutionary conception of divine activity in nature. As such, for all their differences, both groups share similar beliefs concerning the Christian faith. While scholars frequently critique new atheist and protestant fundamentalist arguments by attacking biblical inerrancy or metaphysical naturalism, this paper concludes by arguing that a more successful critique of these two groups can be advanced by questioning the biblical and theological presuppositions that they share.
References
Alexander, D. Creation or Evolution: Do we Have to Choose? Grand Rapids: Monarch Books, 2008. Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, D. Creation or Evolution: Why We Must Choose. Littlethorpe: J6D Publishing, 2009. Search in Google Scholar
Barker, P. Godless. Berkeley: Ulysses Press, 2008. Search in Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. A Manual for Creating Atheists. United States: Pitchstone Publishing, 2013. Search in Google Scholar
Boone, K.C. The Bible Tells Them So. New York: State University of New York Press, 1989. Search in Google Scholar
de Botton, A. Religion for Atheists. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2012. Search in Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. Darwin’s Pious Idea. Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans, 2010. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. A Devil’s Chaplain. London: Phoenix, 2003. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. The Blind Watchmaker. London: Penguin, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. The God Delusion. London: Black Swan, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. The Greatest Show on Earth. London: Black Swan, 2009. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. The Magic of Reality. London: Bantam Press, 2011. Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C. Breaking the Spell. London: Penguin Books, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. London: Penguin, 1995. Search in Google Scholar
Flew, A. There is a God. New York: Harper One, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Gish, D.T. Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! El Cajon: Institute for Creation Research, 1995. Search in Google Scholar
Grayling, A.C. The God Argument. London: Bloomsbury, 2013. Search in Google Scholar
Ham, K. The Lie. Green Forest: Master Books, 2012. Search in Google Scholar
Ham, K., and Hodge, B. How Do We Know the Bible is True? Volume I. Green Forest: Answers in Genesis 2011. Search in Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, H. The Farce of Evolution. Nashville: Word Publishing, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
Harris, S. Letter to a Christian Nation. London: Bantam Press, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Harris, S. The End of Faith. London: The Free Press, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
Haught, J. God and the New Atheism. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2008. Search in Google Scholar
Hitchens, C. God is not Great. London: Atlantic Books, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, P.E. Darwin on Trial. Downer’s Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 1993. Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, D.F. Creation and Change. Scotland: Mentor Books, 1997. Search in Google Scholar
Loftus, J.W. Why I Became an Atheist. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2008. Search in Google Scholar
McGrath, A. The Dawkins Delusion? London: SPCK, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. “What are the Tactics of the New Atheists?” In The Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by K. Ham. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. Biblical Creationism. Green Forest: Master Books, 2000. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. Defending the Faith. Green Forest: Master Books, 1999. Search in Google Scholar
Morris. H.M. Science and the Bible. Chicago: Moody Press, 1995. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. The Genesis Record. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. The Long War Against God. Green Forest: Master Books, 2000. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. & Morris, J.D. The Modern Creation Trilogy. Volume III. Green Forest: Master Books, 1996. Search in Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. & Clark, M.E. The Bible Has the Answer. Green Forest: Master Books, 1976. Search in Google Scholar
Patterson, R. Evolution Exposed. Hebron: Answers in Genesis, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, D. The Dawkins Letters. Great Britain: Christian Focus, 2010. Search in Google Scholar
Sarfati, J. Refuting Evolution. Brisbane: Answers in Genesis, 2002. Search in Google Scholar
Stenger, V.J. God and the Folly of Faith. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2012. Search in Google Scholar
Stenger, V.J. God: The Failed Hypothesis. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Stenger, V.J. The New Atheism. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2009. Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, P.F. The Six Days of Genesis. Green Forest: Master Books, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Upchurch, J. “Confessions of a Former Atheist.” In Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by K. Ham. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014. Search in Google Scholar
Vernon, M. After Atheism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 10.1007/978-0-230-28903-1Search in Google Scholar
Whitcomb, J.C., & Morris, H.M. The Genesis Flood. Phillipsburg: P &R Publishing, 1961. Search in Google Scholar
Young, E.J. In the Beginning. Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 1976. Search in Google Scholar
de Young, D. Thousands… Not Billions. Green Forest: Master Books, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
Zenk, T. “New Atheism”. In The Oxford Handbook on Atheism, edited by S. Bullivant and M. Ruse, 245-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.034Search in Google Scholar
©2015 Liam Jerrold Fraser
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.