Abstract
Alexius Meinong advocated a bold new theory of nonexistent objects, where we could gain knowledge and assert true claims of things that did not exist. While the theory has merit in interpreting sentences and solving puzzles, it unfortunately paves the way for contradictions. As Bertrand Russell argued, impossible objects, such as the round square, would have conflicting properties. Meinong and his proponents had a solution to that charge, posing genuine and non-genuine versions of the Law of Non-Contradiction. No doubt, they had a clever response, but it may not adequately address Russell’s concern. Moreover, as I argue, genuine contradictions are inherent to the set of all nonexistent objects. And such contradictions lead to even further absurdities, for example, that nonexistent objects have and lack every property. Unfortunately, such implications of the theory make it too treacherous to adopt.
[1] Findlay, J. (1963). Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Values (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Griffin, N. (1986). Russell’s Critique of Meinong’s Theory of Objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25/26, 375–401. 10.1163/18756735-02501017Search in Google Scholar
[3] Marek, J. (2008). Alexius Meinong. In E. Zalta (Ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meinong/. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Meinong, A. (1915). Über Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Beiträge zur Gegenstandstheorie und Erkenntnistheorie. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Meinong, A. (1960). The Theory of Objects (I. Levi, D. Terrell, R. Chisholm, Trans.). In R. Chisholm (Ed.). Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, pp. 76–117. New York: The Free Press. (Meinong’s original work published 1904) Search in Google Scholar
[6] Meinong, A. (1972). On Emotional Presentation (M. Schubert Kalsi, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (Meinong’s original work published 1917) Search in Google Scholar
[7] Meinong, A. (1974). Appendix I: On the Theory of Objects (R. Grossmann, Trans.). In R. Grossman (Ed.). Meinong, pp. 224–229. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Meinong’s original work published 1923) Search in Google Scholar
[8] Meinong, A. (1983). On Assumptions (J. Heanue, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California. (Meinong’s original work published 1910) Search in Google Scholar
[9] Meinong, A. (1993). Abstracting and Comparing (R. Rollinger, Trans.). In R. Rollinger (Ed.). Meinong and Husserl on Abstraction and Universals, pp. 137–182. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B. V. (Meinong’s original work published 1900) Search in Google Scholar
[10] Parsons, T. (1979). The Methodology of Nonexistence. Journal of Philosophy 76, 649–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202569810.2307/2025698Search in Google Scholar
[11] Parsons, T. (1980). Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[12] Pasniczek, J. (1995). Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects? Grazer Philosophische Studien 50, 293–303. 10.5840/gps19955016Search in Google Scholar
[13] Routley, R. and Routley, V. (1973). Rehabilitating Meinong’s Theory of Objects. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 27, 224–254. Search in Google Scholar
[14] Routley, R. (1979). Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items. Canberra: Central Printery, Australian National University. Search in Google Scholar
[15] Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind 14, 479–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.47910.1093/mind/XIV.4.479Search in Google Scholar
[16] Thrush, M. (2001). Do Meinong’s Impossible Objects Entail Contradictions? Grazer Philosophische Studien 62, 157–173. 10.1163/18756735-06201009Search in Google Scholar
[17] Zalta, E. (1983). Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 10.1007/978-94-009-6980-3Search in Google Scholar
© 2012 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.