Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

ISSN: 1941-6008

First published: December 1, 2007

Editor-in-chief: Anthony Mark Cutter

About this journal

The journal Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology (SELT) no longer publishes with DeGruyter Publishing.

Your Benefits

Abstracting and Indexing

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
Cabell's Whitelist
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
Gale/Cengage
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
J-Gate
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Microsoft Academic
MyScienceWork
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
Philosopher's Index
PhilPapers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
Reaxys
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
WorldCat (OCLC)

Supplementary Materials

Instruction for Authors

Topics

External Links

Volume 7 Issue 1

April 2013

Article

From ICH to IBH in Biobanking? A Legal Perspective on Harmonization, Standardization and Unification

Anne-Marie Tassé April 13, 2013

More Cite

Abstract

Biobanking activities are increasingly at the core of research practices. Access to such resources is a major interest as it allows the creation of very large datasets and optimizes the use of previously collected research material. The last decade has witnessed the creation of major international research consortia, such as ENGAGE and BioSHaRE.EU, but promoting biobank networking and maximizing public health benefits requires at least some degree of harmonization. In international research initiatives, any discrepancy between national/regional legal frameworks creates hurdles for the development and implementation of cross-border research activities. Unification, standardization and harmonization of national/regional legal frameworks are necessary to minimize these legal discrepancies. However, these concepts have precise legal meanings, and the use of one framework or another leads to specific and different consequences. In order to provide a broad overview of consent issues and solutions emerging from international genetic and genomic research consortia, both the ENGAGE and BioSHaRE.EU consortia are used as a proof of concept. Through a theoretical legal perspective on harmonization, standardization and unification, consent challenges raised by international genetic and genomic research consortia are identified, and solutions proposed. It is essential to discuss the most appropriate solution to promote international research consortia interoperability while respecting both legal and ethical frameworks.

Book Review

Review of Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research

David B. Resnik April 13, 2013

More Cite

Abstract

This is a review of Alan Wertheimer's Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research.

Review of Interfaces on Trial 2.0

David Koepsell April 13, 2013

Cite

The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk

David B. Resnik April 13, 2013

More Cite

Abstract

This is a review of Christian Munthe's The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risks.

Review of Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age

Daniel Patrone December 25, 2013

Cite

Volume 4 (2010)

Volume 3 (2009)

Volume 2 (2008)

Volume 1 (2007)

Issue 1 Questions of Human Enhancement

No ranking information is available for this journal.

Editorial

The journal Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology (SELT) no longer publishes with DeGruyter Publishing.

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

From ICH to IBH in Biobanking? A Legal Perspective on Harmonization, Standardization and Unification

Abstract

Review of Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research

Abstract

Review of Interfaces on Trial 2.0

The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk

Abstract

Review of Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age

Details