De Gruyter De Gruyter
€ EUR - Euro £ GBP - Pound $ USD - Dollar
EN
English Deutsch
0

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Changing the currency will empty your shopping cart.

Comparative Southeast European Studies

Comparative Southeast European Studies

Volume 65 Issue 3

  • Contents
  • Journal Overview
Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Frontmatter

October 12, 2017 Page range: i-i
Cite
Free access PDF PDF

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Household Strategies in Southeast European Societies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Predrag Cvetičanin, Miran Lavrič October 12, 2017 Page range: 449-458
Cite
Free access PDF PDF

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Typology of Household Strategies of Action in Four Countries of Southeastern Europe in a Period of Economic Crisis

Predrag Cvetičanin, Miran Lavrič October 12, 2017 Page range: 459-494
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we explore whether the myriad production and consumption household practices in four societies of Southeastern Europe (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia) can empirically be reduced to a relatively small number of coherent and socially meaningful combinations, which we have labelled household strategies of action. Approaching the same data from two different angles, namely, using Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) and Two-Step Cluster Analysis (TCA), we have identified five general household strategies and eleven more detailed and specific sub-strategies. More importantly, by projecting these strategies and sub-strategies onto the social space, we have shown that these household practices are linked to the class position of households. On a more general level, it is indicated that the study of household strategies can be viewed as a way of rendering relatively static structural approaches, in this case the Bourdieusian approach to social space, more dynamic.

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Thriving and Surviving Activities of Households During the Crisis Period. Empirical Evidence from Southeastern Europe

Adnan Efendić, Predrag Cvetičanin, Ismet Kumalić October 12, 2017 Page range: 495-519
More Cite
Free access PDF PDF

Abstract

We use survey data from Southeastern Europe to investigate determinants which explain thriving and surviving activities of households as their response to the changes caused by the latest global economic crisis of 2007/2008. Contrary to most of the literature that investigates these types of activities as mutually exclusive, our modelling strategy identifies and then focusses on households that have used both of them in the period of crisis. Indeed, the thriving and surviving activities were often used simultaneously and they were mutually related as joint outcomes of a wider system of influences. We identify that both components of household strategies were systematically linked to the economic performance of households and to different dimensions of social capital—generalised trust and informal networking. We also find that different social capital dimensions interact and build in their influence on the success of households—i.e. more engagement in thriving and less in surviving activities.

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Making Ends Meet. How Roma Families Living in Poverty Cope

Lynette Šikić-Mićanović October 12, 2017 Page range: 520-541
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

Literature on how Roma families cope with precarious living conditions and social exclusion remains very limited. Out of all the national minorities and ethnic groups in Croatia, the Roma undoubtedly have the most difficult social position characterised by a high degree of poverty and social exclusion. Based on recent fieldwork, the aim of this article is to explore the coping strategies different Roma populations in Croatia employ to meet their everyday needs. Acknowledging the different forms of interconnected, interdependent and context-specific capital that together constitute advantage and disadvantage in society (Bourdieu 1986), this study analyses Roma’s access to economic, cultural, social, and symbolic capital. Along with discrimination and racism, Roma’s limited access to different forms of capital explicates the necessity of household-based, work-based, kin-based and aid-based strategies among some families living in poverty, especially in light of stricter social welfare policy measures that have been recently introduced.

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Coping Strategies of Economically (Partially) Inactive Households: The Case of Croatia

Dragan Bagić, Ivana Dobrotić, Jasminka Lažnjak, Petra Rodik, Tanja Vučkovićjuroš October 12, 2017 Page range: 542-564
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

How do households with inactive or unemployed members face growing risks and uncertainty? The present study tackles this problem with a case study on Croatia, a country at the bottom of the European Union’s (EU) scale of economic activity rate. The low level of activity that has characterized Croatia for more than twenty years has been accompanied by a continuously high unemployment rate, which has further increased since 2009. In this context, households with (long-term) inactive or unemployed members have had to develop alternative coping strategies. In order to identify and examine these strategies, in 2014 we conducted a mixed-method study, including a quantitative survey of 453 households and 37 semi-structured interviews. We identified six household strategies, more or less ‘successful’ in terms of the household’s material position. In this essay we further examine these strategies’ characteristics and implications, with a focus on the profiles of households employing specific strategies.

Household Strategies in the Period of Economic Crisis

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Small Farmers in Four Southeast European Countries. A Qualitative Analysis of Life Strategies in Twenty-Five Agricultural Households

Nemanja Krstić, Augustin Derado, Andrej Naterer, Ismet Kumalić October 12, 2017 Page range: 565-588
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

This paper brings an extended Bourdieusian theoretical framework to the analysis of the life strategies of small farmers in four SEE societies (Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, and Slovenia). Practices and strategies of farming households are situated in two partially overlapping fields, the formal economy and the informal economy. The paper is based on a qualitative analysis of twenty-five interviewed households. It covers the structural conditions of the households’ participation in both fields of ‘play’, an analysis of household capital (economic-agricultural, social and cultural) and an interpretation of practice (i.e. the strategy dimension). The framework is extended to include an exploration of the households’ reflexivity and agency. The findings suggest that various structural limitations impede the households from developing successful practices in the formal field (unless the households have exceptional levels of agency), and that the most common life strategy is food self-provisioning, along with reliance on practices in the informal field enabled by social capital.

Commentary

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Scholars (Not) Investigating Srebrenica. Academic Feuds and Other Shortcomings

Ger Duijzings October 12, 2017 Page range: 589-595
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

Fifteen years after the publication of the Srebrenica report by the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD), the Srebrenica genocide has not become subject of more scholarly and historical research. On the contrary, academics prefer to keep their hands off the topic, confining themselves to ‘theoretical’, ‘reflexive’, or ‘moralistic’ reflections on the work done by the NIOD team. Symptomatic of the current state of inertia and diminishing professional standards is the recent book by the Dutch historian and psychologist Eelco Runia in which he attacks the NIOD report from a psychoanalytic standpoint.

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Europe’s Balkan Muslims. A New History

Aleksander Zdravkovski October 12, 2017 Page range: 596-597
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Gender (In)equality and Gender Politics in Southeastern Europe. A Question of Justice

Brigita Malenica October 12, 2017 Page range: 598-602
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Civic and Uncivic Values in Kosovo. History, Politics and Value Transformation

Lorik Pustina October 12, 2017 Page range: 602-604
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Entangled Histories of the Balkans. Volume Three. Shared Pasts, Disputed Legacies

Wim van Meurs October 12, 2017 Page range: 604-606
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

About this journal

The quarterly Comparative Southeast European Studies (COMPSEES) evolved into its new format from that of its predecessor Südosteuropa. Journal for Politics and Society. From 2021 onwards, it is published both digitally, in Open Access, and in print, thereby becoming more easily accessible and even more visible internationally, not least in Southeastern Europe itself. Before long, a digital repository of Südosteuropa will be available to everyone.

Comparative Southeast European Studies will continue to be a forum for scholars in Political Science, Sociology, Contemporary History, Anthropology, Economics, International Relations, Law Studies, Gender Studies, Media Studies, Cultural Studies, and related disciplines. Taking a comparative and broad multidisciplinary perspective it will explore critical processes and societal issues related to the area bounded by the eastern Adriatic, the eastern Mediterranean, and the Black Sea. We use two formats to showcase research. There are peer-reviewed research articles and a shorter format open to other text genres, which are presented under headings such as ‘Commentary’, ‘Interview’, ‘Background’, ‘Policy Analysis’, ‘Film in Focus’, ‘Debate’, ‘Spotlight’, ‘Book Symposium’, ‘The Making of...’, for example. This is a flexible section allowing us to address more immediately pertinent political, social, cultural, and academic matters. In addition, the Journal also features a book review section.

The new name Comparative Southeast European Studies is the logical next step in the Journal’s evolution. After it was founded in 1952, for more than half a century its predecessor Südosteuropa served as a well-established policy advice journal monitoring events in the region, before in 2007 taking a turn towards becoming a research-oriented multidisciplinary forum of the social sciences. Since 2014 the Journal has been published exclusively in English. We have continued to work towards improving its quality, including by addressing the citation indices relevant in the field, as they increase the pool of potential authors. A rigorous double-blind peer review regime has guided us while we have become more selective in what we publish. We prioritise work that is empirically and methodologically sound, well-written and jargon-free, thereby fostering interdisciplinary scholarly communication. We remain committed to broadening the range of the research we publish, while welcoming both emerging and established scholars to publish with us. Comparative Southeast European Studies strives to consolidate its reputation as one of the major area studies journals focusing on Southeastern Europe. We encourage transnational and entangled comparative perspectives, acknowledging that any ‘area’, any geographical construct, functions in its transareal, indeed global, relations.

We welcome both single manuscript submissions and proposals for guest-edited thematic sections. We look forward to working with you.


Open Access
  • Contact us
  • Customer Service
  • Human Resources
  • Press
  • Contacts for authors
  • Career
  • How to join us
  • Current Vacancies
  • Working at De Gruyter
  • Open Access
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Funding & Support
  • For Authors
  • Publish your book
  • Publish your journal article
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • For Libraries & Trade Partners
  • Electronic Journals
  • Ebooks
  • Databases & Online Reference
  • Metadata
  • Our Partner Publishers
  • Rights & Permissons
  • Repository Policy
  • Free Access Policy
  • About De Gruyter
  • De Gruyter Foundation
  • Our locations
  • Help/FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Legal Notice
© Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2021