De Gruyter De Gruyter
€ EUR - Euro £ GBP - Pound $ USD - Dollar
EN
English Deutsch
0

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Changing the currency will empty your shopping cart.

Comparative Southeast European Studies

Comparative Southeast European Studies

Volume 65 Issue 4

  • Contents
  • Journal Overview
Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Frontmatter

December 28, 2017 Page range: i-iii
Cite
Free access PDF PDF

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

In Search of Catharsis. Theatre in Serbia in the 1990s

Irena Šentevska December 28, 2017 Page range: 607-631
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

This paper discusses various points about the response of the Serbian theatre to the social crisis of the 1990s. The focus here is on publicly-funded theatres and their role in pacifying or mobilizing theatre audiences either to participate in or revolt against the political projects which accompanied the dissolution of Yugoslavia. The Serbian theatre system in the 1990s entered a clear process of transformation of its models of management, production, financing, public relations and, naturally, the language and forms of expression inherited from the socialist 1980s. The chief interest of this study is the transformation of the theatre system since the end of World War II, theatrical interpretations of the historical and literary past in Serbia, the role of theatre in the identity ‘makeovers’ that followed the demise of Yugoslavia, and stage interpretations of contemporary crises. Consideration is also given to the present state of the theatre in Serbia.

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Denying the Unknown. Everyday Narratives about Croatian Involvement in the 1992-1995 Bosnian Conflict

Ivor Sokolić December 28, 2017 Page range: 632-653
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

This article, based on the results of focus-group discussions, dyads, and interviews in Croatia, examines how Croatians construct their narrative of the 1992-1995 conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia’s role in it. Despite judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) concluding that the Croatian state intervened in the Bosnian conflict, respondents in this study claimed to be ignorant of any such intervention. What was discussed worked in concert with the dominant Croatian war narrative of Croatian defence, victimhood, and sacrifice in the face of a larger, Serbian aggressor. By portraying the Bosnian conflict as chaotic and savage, respondents differentiated it from the Croatian one and relativised any illicit actions within a framework of nesting orientalism. Croatian involvement in Bosnia-Herzegovina was generally seen as positive: it was viewed in terms of Croatia welcoming Bosniak refugees and providing military assistance, which enabled moral licensing with regard to the rarely mentioned and marginalised negative aspects of Croatia’s involvement in the conflict.

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

‘I’m Both a Worker and a Shareholder.’ Workers’ Narratives and Property Transformations in Postsocialist Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia

Anna Calori, Kathrin Jurkat December 28, 2017 Page range: 654-678
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

The authors offer an analysis of the property reforms that accompanied economic transformation in late socialist and postsocialist Yugoslavia, as experienced and narrated by industrial workers in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia today. The property reforms carried out in these two countries between 1990 and the 2000s have profoundly influenced the narratives that workers form around their experience of economic transformation in the workplace. By analysing how industrial workers have developed a feeling of ownership towards their particular workplace, and how they now talk about that experience, the authors provide an explanation for workers’ disillusionment and dissatisfaction towards privatisation reforms in recent years, and show how they have made sense of the seismic shifts in property relations that have accompanied economic reforms since 1989.

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

The Size and Effects of Emigration and Remittances in the Western Balkans. A Forecasting Based on a Delphi Process

Marjan Petreski, Blagica Petreski, Despina Tumanoska, Edlira Narazani, Fatush Kazazi, Galjina Ognjanov, Irena Jankovic, Arben Mustafa, Tereza Kochovska December 28, 2017 Page range: 679-695
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

This paper aims at forecasting the size and effects of remittances and emigration in Macedonia, Albania, Serbia, and Kosovo, using a qualitative forecasting method, a Delphi questionnaire. The authors examined consensus building within and between two groups of respondents: ten experts and twenty remittance receivers per country, in three subsequent rounds–two on the same group and a third cross-round. Consensual results suggest that remittances in the projected five-year period will increase in Macedonia and Serbia, and will reduce in Albania and Kosovo. With less consensus, the results forecast that emigration will decelerate, except in Serbia. Emigration effects for the society have been forecast as predominantly negative due to skilled labour emigration, while remittances were forecast to maintain their effect on poverty in Macedonia and Serbia, and weaken in Albania. Consensus has been reached, except in Macedonia, that remittances will support labour market activity.

Commentary

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Istanbul and Turkey One Year Later. Intriguing–Tense–Inspiring

Oto Luthar December 28, 2017 Page range: 696-706
More Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Abstract

This article reports on a metamorphosis. As a participant in a Marie Curie project called ‘Trans-Making’, the author spent three weeks in Istanbul to see which of three abstract ideas he had considered in advance might match, challenge or subvert existing depictions of one of the most complex metropolitan cities in the world. In clarifying his project proposal, he not only had to face his own private orientalism, but also found that, to come to a basic understanding of the unique metropolis that is Istanbul, he had to observe the anxious present political and cultural changes in everyday life through the longue durée historical lens.

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Re-Making Kozarac. Agency, Reconciliation and Contested Return in Post-War Bosnia

Manuela Brenner December 28, 2017 Page range: 707-709
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Performing Nostalgia. Migration Culture and Creativity in South Albania

Islam Jusufi December 28, 2017 Page range: 709-711
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Welcome to the Desert of Post-Socialism. Radical Politics After Yugoslavia

Geert Luteijn December 28, 2017 Page range: 711-713
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

Book Reviews

Unable to retrieve citations for this document
Retrieving citations for document...

Emotions and Memory Politics in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe

Johanna Paul December 28, 2017 Page range: 714-716
Cite Access restricted Content is available PDF PDF

About this journal

The quarterly Comparative Southeast European Studies (COMPSEES) evolved into its new format from that of its predecessor Südosteuropa. Journal for Politics and Society. From 2021 onwards, it is published both digitally, in Open Access, and in print, thereby becoming more easily accessible and even more visible internationally, not least in Southeastern Europe itself. Before long, a digital repository of Südosteuropa will be available to everyone.

Comparative Southeast European Studies will continue to be a forum for scholars in Political Science, Sociology, Contemporary History, Anthropology, Economics, International Relations, Law Studies, Gender Studies, Media Studies, Cultural Studies, and related disciplines. Taking a comparative and broad multidisciplinary perspective it will explore critical processes and societal issues related to the area bounded by the eastern Adriatic, the eastern Mediterranean, and the Black Sea. We use two formats to showcase research. There are peer-reviewed research articles and a shorter format open to other text genres, which are presented under headings such as ‘Commentary’, ‘Interview’, ‘Background’, ‘Policy Analysis’, ‘Film in Focus’, ‘Debate’, ‘Spotlight’, ‘Book Symposium’, ‘The Making of...’, for example. This is a flexible section allowing us to address more immediately pertinent political, social, cultural, and academic matters. In addition, the Journal also features a book review section.

The new name Comparative Southeast European Studies is the logical next step in the Journal’s evolution. After it was founded in 1952, for more than half a century its predecessor Südosteuropa served as a well-established policy advice journal monitoring events in the region, before in 2007 taking a turn towards becoming a research-oriented multidisciplinary forum of the social sciences. Since 2014 the Journal has been published exclusively in English. We have continued to work towards improving its quality, including by addressing the citation indices relevant in the field, as they increase the pool of potential authors. A rigorous double-blind peer review regime has guided us while we have become more selective in what we publish. We prioritise work that is empirically and methodologically sound, well-written and jargon-free, thereby fostering interdisciplinary scholarly communication. We remain committed to broadening the range of the research we publish, while welcoming both emerging and established scholars to publish with us. Comparative Southeast European Studies strives to consolidate its reputation as one of the major area studies journals focusing on Southeastern Europe. We encourage transnational and entangled comparative perspectives, acknowledging that any ‘area’, any geographical construct, functions in its transareal, indeed global, relations.

We welcome both single manuscript submissions and proposals for guest-edited thematic sections. We look forward to working with you.


Open Access
  • Contact us
  • Customer Service
  • Human Resources
  • Press
  • Contacts for authors
  • Career
  • How to join us
  • Current Vacancies
  • Working at De Gruyter
  • Open Access
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Funding & Support
  • For Authors
  • Publish your book
  • Publish your journal article
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • For Libraries & Trade Partners
  • Electronic Journals
  • Ebooks
  • Databases & Online Reference
  • Metadata
  • Our Partner Publishers
  • Rights & Permissons
  • Repository Policy
  • Free Access Policy
  • About De Gruyter
  • De Gruyter Foundation
  • Our locations
  • Help/FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Legal Notice
© Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2021