Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik

Deutsche Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte

ISSN: 1613-0626

First published: January 1, 1973

Edited by: Vilmos Ágel, Noah Bubenhofer, Helmuth Feilke, Wolfgang Imo, Anke Lüdeling, Doris Tophinke

About this journal

Der Gegenstandsbereich der Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik (ZGL) ist die deutsche Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte in all ihren Differenzierungen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Standardsprache der Gegenwart. Die ZGL veröffentlicht Aufsätze, Diskussionen, Berichte über wichtige Ereignisse im Fach und Kommentare zu ausgewählten Büchern.

Themen

Morphologie, Phonologie, Wortbildung und Syntax des Deutschen
Semantik und Pragmatik
Dialektologie, Soziolinguistik und Textlinguistik
Gegenwartsbezogene sowie sprachhistorisch orientierte Perspektiven
Beiträge zur Fachgeschichte
Interdisziplinär ausgerichtete Untersuchungen

Manuskriptformen

Aufsätze, Diskussionen, Forschungsnotizen, Berichte, Kommentare

History

Die „Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik" wurde 1973 von Els Oksaar, Hans Peter Althaus, Helmut Henne, Peter von Polenz, Siegfried J. Schmidt und Herbert Ernst Wiegand gegründet, um der beginnenden Etablierung der germanistischen Linguistik, als „Wissenschaft mit eigenen spezifischen Aufgaben" (Heft 1, Geleitwort der Herausgeber) Rechnung zu tragen und ist seither eines der zentralen Publikationsorgane des Fachs.

Verwandte Themen:

• Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft (ZRS)
• Reihe Germanistische Linguistik (RGL)
• Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen (LIT)
• Studia Linguistica Germanica (SLG)
• Handbücher Sprachwissen (HSW)
• Konvergenz und Divergenz (KuD)
• Germanistische Arbeitshefte (GA)

Back Issues

Hinweise zur Verfügbarkeit und zu Preisen von Altjahrgängen erhalten Sie unter service@degruyter.com. Von einem Großteil unserer Zeitschriften können alle Jahrgänge außer dem jeweils aktuellen nur noch über die Firma

Schmidt Periodicals GmbH, Bad Feilnbach
Tel: (+49) 80 64-221
Fax: (+49) 80 64-557
Email: schmidt@periodicals.com
http://www.periodicals.com

bezogen werden.

Abstracting and Indexing

Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
BDSL Bibliographie der deutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
BLL Bibliographie Linguistischer Literatur
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Germanistik
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
J-Gate
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Linguistic Bibliography
Linguistics Abstracts Online
Microsoft Academic
MLA International Bibliography
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
OLC Germanistik
OLC Linguistik
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Web of Science - Current Contents/Arts & Humanities
WorldCat (OCLC)
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Volume 49 Issue 1

Titelseiten

April 14, 2021 Page range: i-vi

Cite
Accessible PDF

Verabschiedung und Begrüßung

April 14, 2021 Page range: III-III

Cite

Zum Tod von Helmut Henne

April 14, 2021 Page range: 1-2

Cite

Aufsätze

Parallel- vs. Wechselflexion im dat sg mask/neutr – Ein Erklärungsansatz zur Persistenz der Variation

Said Sahel April 14, 2021 Page range: 3-32

More Cite

Abstract

This paper deals with the variation of adjective inflection in nominal phrases with two consecutive adjectives in the dative singular masculine/neuter (e. g. mit größerem politische m [strong inflection] Einfluss vs. mit größerem politische n [weak inflection] Einfluss ‚with greater political influence‘). Only the second adjective is affected by the variation; it can show strong or weak inflection (parallel inflection vs. alternating inflection). In Standard German, both uses coexist without any difference in meaning or function. This phenomenon is analyzed using corpus data. The focus is on the question why this variation persists almost exclusively in the dative singular masculine/neuter. After the discussion of different explanations available, a phonological approach to explain the persistence of the variation is presented. It is argued that the low phonological contrast between the strong inflection - m and its weak counterpart - n is the reason why the variation is still persistent in the dative singular masculine/neuter. The role of grammar reference works in the persistence of the concerning variation is also discussed.

Passe-partout-Komposita im gesprochenen Deutsch

Sören Stumpf April 14, 2021 Page range: 33-83

More Cite

Abstract

This paper proposes an analysis of German passe-partout compounds like Straßending ( street thing ) and Bananendinger ( banana things ) as morphological constructions. The study shows that these constructions are characteristic of spoken language and must therefore be considered with respect to the particular properties of that genre. Based on the findings about the pragmatically driven word formation an argument is made for a Construction Morphology that is based on usage and speaker interaction. This proposal can be seen as an extension of the current theory of Construction Morphology (Booij 2010). The notion of pragmatically driven word formation is illustrated by a case study of the [X- Ding ] N construction in spoken German. It will be shown that partially filled constructions with Ding as a determinatum have specific semantic and functional-pragmatic properties and are part of a complex family of passe-partout constructions.

Ein korpuslinguistischer Beitrag zu Herkunft und Entwicklung des negativen Indefinitums kein

Simon Pickl April 14, 2021 Page range: 84-120

More Cite

Abstract

This article discusses the origin and historical development of the German n-indefinite kein , which is an unusual negator because it does not share the initial n that marks virtually all other negatives in German. Despite the discussion about its origins going back to the nineteenth century, it is still unclear how kein first emerged and out of which other forms it developed. In this paper, new light is shed on an old controversy using new data and modern corpus-linguistic tools, in this case the Referenzkorpus Mittelhochdeutsch (ReM). The article first summarises the current state of research before presenting and analysing the data. In combination with additional evidence, the results show that certain hypotheses that have to this day been treated as accurate are in fact not viable. Subsequently, a solution that combines some of the existing theses and is compatible with the data is presented: Morphological reanalysis and the ensuing back-formation of kein’ s predecessor nehein – in combination with a phonologically conditioned sound substitution triggered by a shift of the syllable boundary – in the context of negative concord seems the most likely candidate for an accurate explanation of the emergence and early usage patterns of kein in Middle High German. Incongruent evidence from Swiss German, however, suggests that partially convergent developments ensuing from different indefinite forms have taken place in that variety.

„Du rotziger Blasebalckemacherischer Dieb! Solst du mich dutzen?“ – Funktionen des Personalpronomens du in Gryphius’ „Peter Squentz“

Melitta Gillmann, Wolfgang Imo April 14, 2021 Page range: 121-154

More Cite

Abstract

This paper examines the variations and functions of the deictic address pronoun du ( you ) in the satirical Baroque drama “Absurda Comica. Oder Herr Peter Sequentz” written by Andreas Gryphius. Two types of address forms dominate in the drama, which vary in a highly systematic way. The most common one is the honorific form ihr ‘you’, which appears in addresses to humans of equal social status among both craftsmen and nobles. The more intimate pronoun du mainly occurs when the characters address themselves, their body parts or feelings and deities. Even lovers use the polite pronoun ihr ; they switch to du solely when the beloved one is either absent or dead. In addition, there is a switch to du when the characters get into a quarrel, which illustrates the well-known connection of address pronouns to the expression of social deixis and politeness as well as the local, context-sensitive mechanisms of pronoun choice. Finally, generic uses of du are restricted to proverbs in the drama.

Die Verschriftungen in der Dialekterhebung Friedrich Maurers in Baden und im Elsass als Evidenz für die Verbreitung der Standardlautung

Maj-Brit Strobel April 14, 2021 Page range: 155-188

More Cite

Abstract

This paper examines the development of lay transcriptions of base dialects within a period of 50 years in the early 20th century in the Upper Rhine area in Alsace and Baden. I argue that the spread of spoken standard German can be documented by the development of these transcriptions. In alignment with Ganswindt (2017), it is assumed that the still not widespread standard competence at the beginning of this period is reflected in ‚misspellings‘ in the transcriptions of the dialect, since the Standard German grapheme was associated with the phonetics of the regional standard. The lay transcriptions of the Upper German delabialization by the participating teachers from Friedrich Maurer’s indirect dialect survey from 1941 and the survey of the so-called Wenkeratlas from 1887/88 serve as data. A place-by-place comparison via vector maps allows to localize variation patterns. It can be shown that the ‘misspellings’ – i. e. rounded variants in the area of delabialization – are scattered throughout the area and significantly decrease in time as the spoken German standard is spreading. This is especially the case in the area of Baden, where the amount of ‘misspellings’ diminishes from about 30–60 % to 5–30 %. In Alsace, on the other hand, the amount of ‘misspellings’ is generally much lower and consequently the decrease is as well. I argue that the reason for the difference between transcriptions from Baden and Alsace is to be found in the different repertoire structures with a diglossia with two written standard languages – French and German – in Alsace.

Ressourcen

Open-Access-Publizieren in der germanistischen Linguistik – theoretische Fragestellungen und konkrete Praxismöglichkeiten

Yuliya Fadeeva, Dorothee Graf April 14, 2021 Page range: 189-201

Cite

Zeitschriftenschau

April 14, 2021 Page range: 202-207

Cite

Volume 49 (2021)

Issue 1

Volume 48 (2020)

Volume 47 (2019)

Volume 46 (2018)

Volume 45 (2017)

Volume 44 (2016)

Volume 43 (2015)

Volume 42 (2014)

Volume 41 (2013)

Volume 40 (2012)

Volume 39 (2011)

Volume 38 (2010)

Volume 37 (2009)

Volume 36 (2008)

Volume 35 (2007)

Volume 34 (2007)

Volume 33 (2006)

Volume 32 (2004)

Volume 31 (2004)

Volume 30 (2003)

Volume 29 (2001)

Volume 28 (2000)

Volume 27 (1999)

Volume 26 (1998)

Volume 25 (1997)

Volume 24 (1996)

Volume 23 (1995)

Volume 22 (1994)

Volume 21 (1993)

Volume 20 (1992)

Volume 19 (1991)

Volume 18 (1990)

Volume 17 (1989)

Volume 16 (1988)

Volume 15 (1987)

Volume 14 (1986)

Volume 13 (1985)

Volume 12 (1984)

Volume 11 (1983)

Volume 10 (1982)

Volume 9 (1981)

Volume 8 (1980)

Volume 7 (1979)

Volume 6 (1978)

Volume 5 (1977)

Volume 4 (1976)

Volume 3 (1975)

Volume 2 (1974)

Volume 1 (1973)

Cite Score	0.5
European Reference Index for the Humanities
SCImago Journal Rank	0.174
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.622

Submit

Your benefits of publishing with us

Every article easily discoverable because of SEO and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Convenient citation tracking via e-mail alert
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing support

Submission process

Please send your manuscript to one of the editors (go to: Editorial)
Peer review process
Print and online publication

Please note

Please consult the Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement and the Copyright Transfer Agreement
For general questions please consult FAQ for authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Hybrid Open Access

For complete details on hybrid open access publishing at De Gruyter please see: https://www.degruyter.com/page/560

Effective 1st January 2016, authors from an institution affiliated with either the Association of Dutch Universities (VSNU), the Consortium of Swiss Academic Libraries or some UK libraries participating in the Jisc Collections SMP 　may publish primary research and review articles open access in any of De Gruyter’s OnlineOpen journals at a discount of 90% of the APC price. For more information and to confirm whether your institution is eligible please see the following:

The Netherlands: https://www.degruyter.com/page/1461
The UK: https://www.degruyter.com/page/1462
Switzerland: 　https://www.degruyter.com/page/1463

Editorial

In 2021, we welcome Noah Bubenhofer and Wolfgang Imo as new editors of the ZGL. At the same time, Prof. Dr. Angelika Linke leaves the group of editors after 25 years. We thank her for her important input and her great commitment!

Editors

Prof. Dr. Vilmos Ágel
Fachbereich 02 – Institut für Germanistik
Universität Kassel
agel@uni-kassel.de

Prof. Dr. Noah Bubenhofer
Deutsches Seminar
Universität Zürich
noah.bubenhofer@ds.uzh.ch

Prof. Dr. Helmuth Feilke
Fachbereich 05: Sprache – Literatur – Kultur
Institut für Germanistik
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
helmuth.feilke@germanistik.uni-giessen.de

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Imo
Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften
Sprache Literatur Medien I – Institut für Germanistik
Universität Hamburg
wolfgang.imo@uni-hamburg.de

Prof. Dr. Anke Lüdeling
Institut für deutsche Sprache und Linguistik
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
anke.luedeling@rz.hu-berlin.de

Prof. Dr. Doris Tophinke
Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften
Institut für Germanistik und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
Universität Paderborn
doris.tophinke@uni-paderborn.de

Contact Editorial Office

editorial.zgl@degruyter.com

External Reviewers

Janis Androutsopoulos
Irmtraud Behr
Malte Beltz
Anne Berkemeier
Kurt Braunmüller
Eva Breindl
Isabel Buchwald-Wargenau
Helen Christen
Victoria Dabóczy
Antje Dammel
Ulrike Demske
Sophia Döring
Ludwig Eichinger
Hans-Werner Eroms
Gisbert Fanselow
Ekkehard Felder
Marc Felfe
Ulla Fix
Jürg Fleischer
Peter Gallmann
Elvira Glaser
Susanne Günthner
Stefan Habscheid
Mathilde Hennig
Elke Hentschel
Stefan Hinterwimmer
Hagen Hirschmann
Dagobert Höllein
Lann Hornscheidt
Eva-Maria Jacobs
Péter Kappel
Manfred Kienpointner
Nina Klug
Clemens Knobloch
Michael Kotin
Alfred Lameli
Miriam Langlotz
Alexander Lasch
Katrin Lehnen
Mingya Liu
Anja Lobenstein-Reichmann
Henning Lobin
Konstanze Marx
Birgit Mesch
Sascha Michel
Christine Mooshammer
Damaris Nübling
Jakob Ossner
Sandra Pappert
Jörg Peters
Ludwig Rübekeil
Christoph Schamberger
Stefan Schierholz
Jürgen Schiewe
Jürgen E. Schmidt
Mirjam Schmuck
Ingmar Schuster
Guido Seiler
Elena Smirnova
Katrin Steyer
Barbara Stiebels
Anja Stukenbrock
Renata Szczepaniak
Maria Thurmair
Jürgen Trouvain
Klaus v. Heusinger
Christiane v. Stutterheim
Elisabeth Verhoeven
Petra Vogel
Ingo Warnke
Klaus Welke
Alexander Werth
Claudia Wich-Reif
Nicole Wilk
Angelika Wöllstein
Evelyn Ziegler
Gisela Zifonun

(Deutsch)

Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik

Deutsche Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Details