journal: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie

Impact Factor: 0.4

Veröffentlicht seit 1. Januar 1888

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie

ISSN: 1613-0650

Herausgegeben von: Karin de Boer, Anja Jauernig, Katja Vogt

Wissenschaftlicher Beirat: Peter Scott Adamson, James V. Allen, John Carriero, Edwin M Curley, Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson, Juliet Floyd, Eckart Förster, Michael Friedman, Don Garrett, Gerd Grasshoff, Paul Guyer, Terence Irwin, Olli Koistinen, Michelle Kosch, Richard Kraut, Béatrice Longuenesse, Mary McCabe, Robert Pasnau, Dominik Perler, Elizabeth S. Radcliffe, Bernard Reginster, Susan Sauvé Meyer, Alison Simmons, Jens Timmermann, Cecilia Trifogli

Über diese Zeitschrift

Das Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie publiziert herausragende Beiträge zu allen Epochen der westlichen Philosophie. Das Archiv legt Wert auf höchste Standards in historischer Genauigkeit, argumentativer Präzision und sprachlich luzider Darstellung.

Geschichte

Seit seiner Gründung 1888 durch Ludwig Stein hat das Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie ein großes internationales Renommee und gilt als ein weltweit herausragendes Diskussionsforum für die abendländische Philosophiegeschichte. Das Archiv ist detaillierter Forschung und präziser Argumentation verpflichtet und betont dabei die Notwendigkeit, historische Texte in ihrem philosophischen und historischen Kontext zu verstehen.

Renommierte Forscher der Philosophie des ausgehenden 19. und der ersten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts haben im Archiv Beiträge veröffentlicht. Während seiner über 40jährigen Herausgeberschaft wurde Ludwig Stein von so herausragenden Gelehrten wie Eduard Zeller, Wilhelm Dilthey, Ernst Cassirer, Alexandre Koyré und Heinrich Rickert unterstützt. Autoren waren u. a. Paul Natorp, Charles Adam, Paul Tannery und Alessandro Chiapelli.

Nach einem Wechsel der Herausgeberschaft im Jahr 1926 publizierte die Zeitschrift unter dem neuen Titel Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie und Soziologie zusätzlich auch Artikel zur Geschichte der Soziologie. Arthur Stein, der Sohn Ludwig Steins, der 1930 die Herausgeberschaft übernahm, stellte den ursprünglichen Namen und das Programm der Zeitschrift wieder her. Als die Nationalsozialisten Mitte der 30er Jahre das öffentliche Leben gleichschalteten, entschloss sich Stein das Erscheinen der Zeitschrift lieber einzustellen, als die wissenschaftliche Reputation des Archivs zu gefährden.

Nach 27 Jahren wurde es 1960 von Paul Wilpert wiederbegründet. Um den wissenschaftlichen Dialog zwischen Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten zu pflegen, wurde ein Mitherausgeber aus Amerika berufen. Heute ist das Archiv durch die Publikation von Artikeln namhafter Autoren im Bereich der philosophiehistorischen Forschung weltweit führend.

Zu den renommierten Autoren des Archiv gehören unter anderem C.I. Gerhardt, Paul Barth, Carl Stumpf, T. J. De Boer, Camille Bos, Arthur Lovejoy, Wilhelm Max Wundt, Émile Bréhier, C. M. Gillespie, Jean Wahl, Carl Gebhardt, Nicholas Rescher, Martial Gueroult, A.C. Lloyd, Jules Vuillemin, Claude Imbert, Maurice de Gandillac, Jonathan Barnes, Anthony A. Long, Charles H. Kahn, Gisela Striker, Karl Bärthlein, Robert M. Adams, Michael Frede, Margaret Dauler Wilson, John M. Cooper, Yvon Belaval, Gail Fine, Louis E. Loeb, Desmond M. Clarke, Martha Nussbaum, Daniel Garber, Nicholas Jolley, Jean-Marie Beyssade, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, Norman Kretzmann, Kenneth Winkler und Karl Ameriks.

Ehemalige Mitglieder des wissenschaftlichen Beirats

Jaakko Hintikka (1969–1993), Ludwig Landgrebe (1969–1989), G.E.L. Owen (1969–1983), Josef Schmucker (1969–1993), Wolfgang Stegmüller (1969–1991), Jules Vuillemin (1969–1993), Richard Walzer (1969–1975), Julius Weinberg (1969–1972), Wolfgang Wieland (1969–2011), Albert Zimmermann (1969–1993), Margaret D. Wilson (1973–1998), Richard Wollheim (1976–1993), Claudio Cesa (1984–2002), Rudolf Haller (1984–1993), Klaus Hartmann (1984–1991), Richard Sorabji (1984–1993), Jürgen Sprute (1986–2002), Karl Schumann (1990–2002), Wolfgang Carl (1994–2011), John M. Cooper (1994–2015), Hans Friedrich Fulda (1994–2011), Ruedi Imbach (1994–2006), Pierre-François Moreau (1994–2011), Ulises C. Moulines (1994–2002), Rainer Specht (1994–2011), Dorothea Frede (2003–2020), Jürgen Stolzenberg (2003–2011), Wolfgang R. Mann (2006–2013), Hermann Weidemann (2006–2023), Wolfgang Bartuschat (2011–2022), Günter Zöller (2012–2023)

Abstracting und Indexing

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie ist in den folgenden Services indiziert:

Baidu Scholar
Base d’information bibliographique en patristique / Bibliographic Information Base in Patristics (BIBP)
BDSL Bibliographie der deutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
Brepols: L'Année philologique
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Ingenta Connect
International Philosophical Bibliography - Répertoire bibliographique de la philosophie
J-Gate
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
Philosopher's Index
PhilPapers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
Scilit
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Web of Science - Current Contents/Arts & Humanities
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Zusatzmaterial

Fachgebiete

Band 105 Heft 4

Dezember 2024

Öffentlich zugänglich 21. November 2023

Titelseiten

Seiten: I-III

PDF downloaden

Articles

8. Oktober 2021

The Analysis of False Judgement According to Being and Not-Being in Plato’s Theaetetus (188c10–189b9)

Paolo Crivelli

Seiten: 509-566

Mehr

Abstract

The version of the paradox of false judgement examined at Tht. 188c10–189b9 relies on the assumption that to judge falsehoods is to judge the things which are not. The presentation of the argument displays several syntactic ambiguities: at several points it allows the reader to adopt different syntactic connections between the components of sentences. For instance, when Socrates says that in a false judgement the cognizer is “he who judges the things which are not about anything whatsoever” (188d3–4), how should the clause “about anything whatsoever” be construed? In common with “he who judges” and “the things which are not” (in which case the cognizer would be “he who judges about anything whatsoever the things which are not about it”), or exclusively with “he who judges” (in which case the cognizer would be “he who judges about anything whatsoever the things which are not”)? The most plausible answer is that both construals are envisaged. Accordingly, the argument has two branches corresponding to these two alternative construals. In particular, it attempts to show that in both cases the cognizer will address what does not exist – an impossibility. The idea that a false judgement is concerned with what is not about its reference has a clear echo in the Sophist . The way in which the problem is handled in the Theaetetus provides a hint that can help to find a solution for the hotly debated issue of the interpretation of the Sophist ’s account of false statement.

18. Mai 2022

Clotho’ Spindle: Xenocrates’ Doctrine of Indivisibles

Olga Alieva

Seiten: 567-590

Mehr

Abstract

This paper offers a reconstruction of Xenocrates’ theory of indivisibles which would not commit him to the idea of ‘jerky motion’ criticized by Aristotle in Physica VI, yet would perfectly square with Plato’s Timaeus , the basis of Xenocrates’ canon. Relying on Alexander’s, Porphyry’s, and Themistius’s accounts of his theory, as well on a detailed analysis of De lineis insecabilibus , I suggest that Xenocrates’ minima, contrary to what Aristotle implies, are not to be understood as more or less stable particulars, like tiny chunks of matter, moving about or leaping in physical space from point A to point B. Yet Xenocrates’ minima do remain ‘physical’ and ‘corporeal’ in a more Platonic sense of these words, not presupposing any kind of leaping, jumping, or jerking. This explains why Xenocrates associated the sensible realm with one of the three Fates, namely Clotho.

18. März 2022

Kant’s Theory of Concept Formation and his Theory of Definitions

Matthew McAndrew

Seiten: 591-619

Mehr

Abstract

Much of the scholarship on Kant’s theory of concept formation has focused on the question of whether his theory suffers from circularity, i. e., whether it presupposes the very concepts whose origin it should explain. In this article, I defend Kant against a well-known objection raised by Hannah Ginsborg. Ginsborg, I argue, overlooks the relatively narrow aim of Kant’s theory of concept formation. Kant explicitly frames it as an account of a concept’s inherent generality, or form. However, Ginsborg’s objection is not about a concept’s form; it concerns the concept’s content. Moreover, Kant addresses the issue that she raises in his theory of definitions, which explains how a concept’s content can be revised and perfected. Kant considered all empirical concepts to be incomplete and imprecise. For this reason, he denied that they can be properly defined. Kant also did not regard the content of empirical concepts as fixed or permanent. Indeed, he expected that we would continually expand and revise their content on the basis of experience. I argue that these facts, along with the narrow scope of Kant’s theory of concept formation, effectively defuse Ginsborg’s objection.

20. Dezember 2021

If the I is a Point, How Can It have a Direction? Fichte’s Two-Stage Conceptualization of the Absolute I

Yehuda Oren

Seiten: 620-647

Mehr

Abstract

Fichte claims in Section 5 of the Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre ( GWL ) that the absolute I contains a difference between two directions. In this paper, I argue that this specific claim complements, rather than contradicts, his general position in Section 1, according to which the absolute I is a simple identity or a point. I first show that we can identify a version of what I call Fichte’s Two-Directions Theory in texts written both before and after the GWL . I term this version his Two-Series Theory. Drawing on this reading, I demonstrate, in contrast to previous research, that Fichte consistently formulates the absolute I in a twofold manner: as a pure act that precedes any difference and as a proposition that contains a relation. I further argue that Fichte’s treatment of the absolute I as a simple unity and as a unity of two directions maps onto two stages within his philosophical investigation. On my account, Fichte seeks to comprehend the absolute I by considering the I’s activity both as it is in itself and as it presents itself to thought.

12. April 2022

Idealismus, „neuer“ Realismus und die Anfänge der analytischen Philosophie in den Vereinigten Staaten

Matthias Neuber

Seiten: 648-684

Mehr

Abstract

Analytic philosophy in the United States emerged parallel to the demise of idealism. During the second half of the nineteenth century, Josiah Royce had contributed importantly to the predominance of idealist systems and corresponding academic groups. With the rise of pragmatism and new realism, the situation changed dramatically: the idealist movement lost momentum and realism began to dominate the discourse. The present paper argues that the critiques of idealism put forward by the realists during the first two decades of the twentieth century were instrumental to the emergence of analytic philosophy in the United States. As I will explain, Ralph Barton Perry (1876–1957) was the key figure in the underinvestigated genesis of this movement.

Book Reviews

17. Juni 2023

Jones, Tom. George Berkeley: A Philosophical Life. Princeton / Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021, xxi + 622 pp.

Manuel Fasko

Seiten: 685-688

Ahead-of-Print / Just-Accepted

Ahead-of-Print / Just-Accepted

Band 105 (2023)

Band 104 (2022)

Band 103 (2021)

Band 102 (2020)

Band 101 (2019)

Band 100 (2018)

Band 99 (2017)

Band 98 (2016)

Band 97 (2015)

Band 96 (2014)

Band 95 (2013)

Band 94 (2012)

Band 93 (2011)

Band 92 (2010)

Band 91 (2009)

Band 90 (2008)

Band 89 (2007)

Band 88 (2006)

Band 87 (2005)

Band 86 (2004)

Band 85 (2003)

Band 84 (2002)

Band 83 (2001)

Band 82 (2000)

Band 81 (1999)

Band 80 (1998)

Band 79 (1997)

Band 78 (1996)

Band 77 (1995)

Band 76 (1994)

Band 75 (1993)

Band 74 (1992)

Band 73 (1991)

Band 72 (1990)

Band 71 (1989)

Band 70 (1988)

Band 69 (1987)

Band 68 (1986)

Band 67 (1985)

Band 66 (1984)

Band 65 (1983)

Band 64 (1982)

Band 63 (1981)

Band 62 (1980)

Band 61 (1979)

Band 60 (1978)

Band 59 (1977)

Band 58 (1976)

Band 57 (1975)

Band 56 (1974)

Band 55 (1973)

Band 54 (1972)

Band 53 (1971)

Band 52 (1970)

Band 51 (1969)

Band 50 (1968)

Band 49 (1967)

Band 48 (1966)

Heft 1-3

Band 47 (1965)

Heft 1-3

Band 46 (1964)

Band 45 (1963)

Band 44 (1962)

Band 43 (1961)

Band 42 (1960)

Band 41 (1933)

Band 40 (1931)

Band 39 (1930)

Heft 1-4

Band 38 (1928)

Heft 1-4

Band 37 (1926)

Band 36 (1924)

Heft 1-2

Band 35 (1923)

Heft 1-2

Band 34 (1922)

Band 33 (1921)

Band 32 (1920)

Band 31 (1918)

Heft 1-4

Band 30 (1917)

Heft 1-4

Band 29 (1916)

Band 28 (1915)

Heft 1-4

Band 27 (1914)

Band 26 (1913)

Band 25 (1912)

Band 24 (1911)

Band 23 (1910)

Heft 1-4

Band 22 (1909)

Band 21 (1908)

Band 20 (1907)

Band 19 (1906)

Band 18 (1905)

Band 17 (1904)

Band 16 (1903)

Band 15 (1902)

Band 14 (1901)

Band 13 (1900)

Band 12 (1899)

Band 11 (1898)

Band 10 (1897)

Heft 1-4

Band 9 (1896)

Band 8 (1895)

Band 7 (1894)

Band 6 (1893)

Band 5 (1892)

Band 4 (1891)

Band 3 (1890)

Band 2 (1889)

Band 1 (1888)

Journal Impact Factor	0.4	2022, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2023)
5-year Journal Impact Factor	0.4	2022, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2023)
Journal Citation Indicator	0.49	2022, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2023)
CiteScore	0.6	2022, Scopus (Elsevier B.V., 2023)
SCImago Journal Rank	0.234	2022, SJR (Scimago Lab, 2023; Data Source: Scopus)
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.888	2022, CWTS Journal Indicators (CWTS B.V., 2023; Data Source: Scopus)

Weitere Informationen über Zeitschriftenmetriken

Einreichen

Manuscripts can be submitted online at: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/agph

The Archiv does not accept unsolicited book reviews. For all other queries on book reviews, please contact agp.reviews@degruyter.com

Instructions for authors

Stylesheet

Editorial

Editors

Karin de Boer, KU Leuven
Anja Jauernig, New York University
Katja Vogt, Columbia University

Book Review Editors

Julia Borcherding, University of Cambridge, agp.reviews@degruyter.com
Anna Schriefl, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, agp.reviews@degruyter.com

Managing Editor

Carlo DaVia, agp@degruyter.com

(English)

Online ISSN: 1613-0650
Print ISSN: 0003-9101
Typ: Zeitschrift
Sprachen: Englisch, Deutsch, Französisch
Verlag: De Gruyter
Erstveröffentlichung: 1. Januar 1888
Erscheinungsweise: 4 Hefte pro Jahr
Zielgruppe: Wissenschaftler und Studierende der Philosophie, Bibliotheken, Institute
Schlagworte: Global Historische Philosophy