Published since May 1, 1979

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

ISSN: 2365-9858

Edited by: Michael Baurmann, Anton Leist, Ulf Tranow

About this journal

ANALYSE & KRITIK

is devoted to the fundamental issues of empirical and normative social theory
is directed at social scientists and social philosophers who combine commitment to political and moral enlightenment with argumentative rigour and conceptual clarity
develops social theorizing in connection with analytical philosophy and philosophy of science
promotes the dialogue between Anglo-American and Continental traditions in the social sciences and ethics
publishes articles in English

Abstracting and Indexing

Analyse & Kritik is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
BLL Bibliographie Linguistischer Literatur
Cabells Journalytics
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest)
J-Gate
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Microsoft Academic
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
PhilPapers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
WorldCat (OCLC)
Yewno Discover

Topics

Volume 44 Issue 1

May 2022

Publicly Available July 7, 2022

Frontmatter

Page range: i-iv

Download PDF

July 7, 2022

Liberalism and Social Theory after John Rawls

Katrina Forrester

Page range: 1-22

Abstract

Does neo-Rawlsian political philosophy offer an adequate account of the social conditions of capitalism? In this paper, I present two arguments for thinking that it does not. First, I develop a historicist critique of liberal egalitarianism, arguing that it provides a vision of social reality that is intimately connected to the historical and ideological constellation that I call postwar liberalism, and as such cannot account for social reality since the neoliberal revolutions of the late twentieth century. Second, I explore arguments in Marxist and critical social theory that cast liberal egalitarianism as partial, on account of its inadequate portrait of capitalist society. In surveying responses to these critiques, I argue that merely extending liberal egalitarianism into new domains to account for how contemporary circumstances have changed since the mid-twentieth century cannot address the problem of its partial view of the social world. Taking seriously the insights of critical social theory and the study of capitalism should lead to a challenge to liberal egalitarianism, not an extension of it.

July 7, 2022

Durkheimian Thoughts on In the Shadow of Justice

Joel Isaac

Page range: 23-30

Abstract

This paper uses Durkheim’s distinction between cause and function to explore the aims and implications of Forrester’s critique of liberal egalitarianism in In the Shadow of Justice . I suggest that there is an interesting tension in Forrester’s argument between the portrayal of Rawlsian justice theory as a vestigial institution—a ‘survival’—left over from 1950s liberalism, and its continuing presence in political theory as a doctrine that has a strong function in policing the bounds of permissible philosophical discourse on politics. I then suggest that liberals are, in their nature, functionalists about politics, and that this may mean that they cannot easily countenance the kind of realism for which Forrester advocates at the end of her book.

July 7, 2022

Capitalism, Justice, and the Boundaries of Liberalism

Steven Lukes

Page range: 31-39

Abstract

The argument of Katrina Forrester’s In the Shadow of Justice explains the present neglect of Rawlsian thinking in the social and political world beyond academia. She there convincingly shows how its deep assumptions, conceptual framing and narrow view of what constitutes politics disabled it from grappling with the subsequent massive transformations of capitalism. Her second argument, advanced in her article and questioned here, offers an ideology critique of Rawlsian thinking that claims, in its strongest version, that such thinking fails to acknowledge that capitalism is not reformable and that this failure derives from its liberal assumptions. What is needed, she claims, is a critique that implies the feasibility of attaining a post-capitalist world that is based on a theory that goes beyond the boundaries of liberalism.

July 7, 2022

Whose Realism? Which Legitimacy? Ideologies of Domination and Post-Rawlsian Political Theory

William Clare Roberts

Page range: 41-60

Abstract

There is something amiss about post-Rawlsian efforts to bring political theory down to earth by insisting upon the political primacy of the question of legitimacy, peace, or order. The intuition driving much realism seems to be that we must first agree to get along, and only then can we get down to the business of pursuing justice. I argue that the ideological narratives of the powerful pose a political problem for this primacy of legitimacy thesis. To prioritize the achievement of democratic legitimacy seems to make sense only to the extent that we already live in a world in which systematic domination—and its ideological baggage—has been stamped out. I draw on the social study of domination for the sake of combatting in political theory the temptation to focus on the static design of the constitutional state at the expense of ignoring or even condemning the social processes that motivate legal and constitutional changes.

July 7, 2022

How to Do Things with Justice: Professor Rawls, 1962–1971

Brad Baranowski

Page range: 61-85

Abstract

Understanding the social bases of what John Rawls meant by justice requires understanding a central part of Rawls’s professional life: his role as a teacher. As this essay shows, Rawls’s approach to teaching was not ancillary to his approach to heady philosophical issues like the justification of moral reasoning. Rather, there’s an ethic that runs through Rawls’s work, one focused on deliberation and consensus-seeking, and one whose strengths and weaknesses are easiest to see when you examine his teaching.

July 7, 2022

John Rawls and R. M. Hare: A Study of Canonization

Bruce Kuklick

Page range: 87-110

Abstract

Why is someone enduringly prized as a philosopher? To answer this question, this historical case study examines the intersecting careers of John Rawls and R. M. Hare. It looks at their writings, a complex chain of disagreements, the argumentative dimension. The essay moreover explores the clash of differing temperaments. Finally, themes in addition to ratiocination and personality are factored in: the leanings of the institutions that control access to intellectual endeavor; the public square—politics widely conceived—into which the two men were thrown; and the cultural rivalry between England and America after World War Two.

General Part

Publicly Available July 7, 2022

International Relations Theory and the Ukrainian War

Richard Ned Lebow

Page range: 111-135

More Download PDF

Abstract

Drawing on my qualitative and quantitative research I show that the motives for war have changed in the course of the last four centuries, and that the causes of war and the responses of others to the use of force are shaped by society. Leaders who start wars rarely behave with the substantive and instrumental rationality assumed by realist and rationalist approaches. For this reason, historically they lose more than half wars than they start. After 1945, the frequency of failure rises to over 80 percent. Rationalists allow for miscalculation but attribute it to lack of information. In most wars, information was available beforehand that indicated, or certainly suggested, that the venture would not succeed militarily or fail to achieve its political goals. The war in Ukraine is a case in point.

Discussion

July 7, 2022

Does Post-truth Expand or Restrict Political Choice? Politics, Planning, and Expertise in a Post-truth Environment

William T. Lynch

Page range: 137-159

Abstract

Steve Fuller has replied to my critique of his endorsement of a post-truth epistemology. I trace the divergence in our approach to social epistemology by examining our distinct responses to the principle of symmetry in the sociology of scientific knowledge. Fuller has extended the concept of symmetry and challenged the field to embrace a post-truth condition that flattens the difference between experts and the public. By contrast, I have criticized the concept of symmetry for policing the field to rule ideology critique out of court. I argue that a focus on post-truth populism obscures the role of counter-elites and ideologies that restrict political choice. A better way to promote democracy would be to support minority positions within science that promise to open up suppressed political possibilities and to seek the coordinated use of different disciplines to address significant public problems.

Open Access July 7, 2022

Symmetry in World-Historic Perspective: Reply to Lynch

Steve Fuller

Page range: 161-169

More Download PDF

Abstract

William Lynch has persistently questioned the politics underlying my appeal to science and technology studies’ flagship symmetry principle. He believes that it licenses the worst features of the ‘post-truth condition’. I respond in two parts, the first facing the future and the second facing the past. In the first part, I argue that the symmetry principle will be crucial in decisions that society will increasingly need to make concerning the inclusion of animals and machines on grounds of sentience, consciousness, intelligence, etc. In the second part, I argue that the symmetry principle has been in fact at the core of the ‘justice as fairness’ idea that has been at the core of both liberal and socialist democracies. Difficulties start once the means of expression and communication are made widely available and the standards of fairness are subject to continual questioning and renegotiation.

Volume 44 (2022)

Issue 1 Focus: The Social Bases of Political Theory

Volume 43 (2021)

Volume 42 (2020)

Volume 41 (2019)

Volume 40 (2018)

Volume 39 (2017)

Volume 38 (2016)

Volume 37 (2015)

Issue 1-2

Volume 36 (2014)

Volume 35 (2013)

Volume 34 (2012)

Volume 33 (2011)

Volume 32 (2010)

Volume 31 (2009)

Volume 30 (2008)

Volume 29 (2007)

Volume 28 (2006)

Volume 27 (2005)

Volume 26 (2004)

Volume 25 (2003)

Volume 24 (2002)

Volume 23 (2001)

Volume 22 (2000)

Volume 21 (1999)

Volume 20 (1998)

Volume 19 (1997)

Volume 18 (1996)

Volume 17 (1995)

Volume 16 (1994)

Volume 15 (1993)

Volume 14 (1992)

Volume 13 (1991)

Volume 12 (1990)

Volume 11 (1989)

Volume 10 (1988)

Volume 9 (1987)

Issue 1-2

Volume 8 (1986)

Volume 7 (1985)

Volume 6 (1984)

Volume 5 (1983)

Volume 4 (1982)

Volume 3 (1981)

Volume 2 (1980)

Volume 1 (1979)

No ranking information is available for this journal.

Submit

Submission of manuscripts: Only original versions of articles will be reviewed for publication. Authors are requested to send an electronic copy of their manuscript to

baurmann@phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de

leist@access.uzh.ch.

Hard copies should be delivered to the postal address of the editors (see "Editorial"). Please provide the full title of the article, as well as the author’s name, affiliation and present address on the cover page of the manuscript. The text can be sent in any established format, but LaTeX is preferred. Manuscripts should not exceed 20 printed pages (about 70.000 characters).

Abstracts: An English abstract of no more than 150 words should be attached.

Footnotes: Notes should be kept to a minimum.

Quotations: Use double quotation marks for quoted text or concepts. Single quotation marks should be used for figurative or stylistic usage and for quotations within quotations. Longer quotations should be indented and quotation marks added.

References: For citation and references orient yourself on the Chicago Manual of Style to be found here.

Hybrid Open Access

In this journal, authors have the option to publish their article under an open access license. Open Access allows you as an author to retain copyright and share your findings with colleagues and interested parties worldwide without any restraints.
Please note that authors from institutions with which we have a transformative agreement can publish open access without paying an article processing charge (APC). More information on the eligible institutions and articles can be found under the "Funding and Support" tab here.

Editorial

Editors

Michael Baurmann
Universität Düsseldorf
Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut
Universitätsstr. 1
D-40225 Düsseldorf
Michael.Baurmann@analyse-und-kritik.net　

Anton Leist
Ethik-Zentrum
Universität Zürich
Zollikerstr. 117
CH-8008 Zürich
leist@access.uzh.ch　

Prof. Dr. Ulf Tranow
Universität Düsseldorf
Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
Universitätsstr. 1
D-40225 Düsseldorf
tranow@phil.uni-duesseldorf.de

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 2365-9858
Print ISSN: 0171-5860
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter Oldenbourg
First published: May 1, 1979
Publication Frequency: 2 Issues per Year

For journal authors

For book authors

For librarians

Rights & Permissions

Open Access

Publication types

Subjects we publish

Contact

Career

About De Gruyter

Partnerships

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Frontmatter

Liberalism and Social Theory after John Rawls

Abstract

Durkheimian Thoughts on In the Shadow of Justice

Abstract

Capitalism, Justice, and the Boundaries of Liberalism

Abstract

Whose Realism? Which Legitimacy? Ideologies of Domination and Post-Rawlsian Political Theory

Abstract

How to Do Things with Justice: Professor Rawls, 1962–1971

Abstract

John Rawls and R. M. Hare: A Study of Canonization

Abstract

International Relations Theory and the Ukrainian War

Abstract

Does Post-truth Expand or Restrict Political Choice? Politics, Planning, and Expertise in a Post-truth Environment

Abstract

Symmetry in World-Historic Perspective: Reply to Lynch

Abstract