Published since November 1, 2001

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

ISSN: 1935-1682

Editors-in-chief: Sandra Ludwig, Hendrik Schmitz

Edited by: Francesca Barigozzi, Johann K. Brunner, Robert Fleck, Giovanni Mastrobuoni, Mariapia Mendola, Till Requate, Frans de Vries, Tobias Wenzel

Impact Factor: 0.667

About this journal

Objective
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (BEJEAP) welcomes submissions that employ microeconomics to analyze issues in organizational economics, consumer behavior, and public policy. Articles submitted to BEJEAP can come in two formats: research papers and letters. Authors should bring to their analysis whatever microeconomic theoretical, experimental or econometric tools are helpful. We publish both empirical work and applied theory (though not more abstract forms of applied theory), and our aim is to disseminate papers that have practical implications for public policy, organizational or individual decision making.

Topics

Design of organizations and institutions
Industrial organization
Health economics
Public finance
Labour Economics
Economics of education, family, development, law, or the environment
Effects of domestic and international policy

Article formats
Research Papers, Letters

> Information on submission process

Your Benefits

Your benefits:

Quick publication of cutting-edge research
Practical implications for public policies
Empirical work and applied theory
High quality peer-review

History

Content available since 2001 (Volume 1, Issue 1)

Abstracting and Indexing

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy is covered by the following services:

ABDC - Australian Business Deans Council
Academic Journal Guide (CABS, UK)
Baidu Scholar
Cabells Journalytics
Case
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
EconBiz
ECONIS
EconLit
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
ICAP Alcohol Information Databases
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest)
J-Gate
Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Microsoft Academic
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Instructions for Authors

Topics

External Links

Volume 21 Issue 3

July 2021

Accessible July 14, 2021

Frontmatter

Page range: i-ii

Download PDF

Research Articles

April 8, 2021

Media Capture and Bias in the Market for News

Abhra Roy

Page range: 835-862

Abstract

We analyze a model of media bias under government capture and a free press. The government wants citizens to invest in a project. Citizens gain from investing only if the state of the economy is good. The state is unobserved. The media firm receives a noisy signal about the actual state and makes a report about whether or not the state of the economy is good. Citizens read the report and decide whether or not to invest. In this context, we show that media bias under government capture may be smaller (greater) than that under free press if the cost of investment is sufficiently high (low) provided that the signal noise is below a certain threshold. Finally, we show that the difference between the bias under government capture and free press diverges (converges) when the cost of investment is sufficiently high (low) in response to a reduction in noise.

March 22, 2021

Adaptation and Loss Aversion in the Relationship Between GDP and Subjective Well-Being

Matti Hovi, Jani-Petri Laamanen

Page range: 863-895

Abstract

We examine the roles of macro-level adaptation — including social comparison effects becoming more important over time — and macroeconomic loss aversion in the time-series relationship between national income and subjective well-being. Models allowing for these phenomena are applied to cross-country panel data. We find evidence for macroeconomic loss aversion that becomes more important over time: the effects of economic growth become small and statistically insignificant in the long run, whereas the effects of contractions are large and long-lasting. The results are consistent with the Easterlin paradox and point to it being explained by macro-level adaptation to economic growth. Our results highlight the importance of allowing for both dynamics to distinguish long-run from short-run effects and asymmetries to recognize the important effects of contractions. Failing to do the former leads to a misleading impression of the long-run relationship between economic growth and well-being.

Accessible April 30, 2021

Racial Disparity in COVID-19 Deaths: Seeking Economic Roots with Census Data

John McLaren

Page range: 897-919

More Download PDF

Abstract

This note seeks the socio-economic roots of racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality, using monthly county-level mortality, economic, and demographic data from 3140 counties through December 2020. The county-level approach shows a sharp disparity affecting all minority groups in the sample, peaking in spring or summer 2020 and then dissipating by the end of autumn. The effect disappears for Asian Americans when occupation and other controls are added, but not for other minorities; for them, the racial disparity, as long as it lasts, does not seem to be due to differences in income, poverty rates, education, occupational mix, or even access to healthcare insurance, although in April public transit use explains a large part of it. This is a puzzle, but the rapid change in the disparities over the year show that they are not immutable – an important message for future pandemics.

May 11, 2021

Can Targeted Child Benefits Affect Fertility? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Panayiota Lyssiotou

Page range: 921-965

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature on whether targeted cash child benefits can affect fertility and, specifically, induce families to have more than two children. We exploit the introduction of a monthly non-means tested cash child benefit paid only to families with at least four children. We apply a quasi experimental methodology since the reform is expected to have increased births of fourth child relative to births of third child or higher than four. We find robust evidence that the reform increased significantly the treated family’s probability to have a (fourth) child by about 5% and had no effect on births greater than four. In the post reform period, the control group’s probability to have a (third) child was not significantly different than before the reform. In particular, the finding that the probability of birth among parities greater than four was not affected by the reform supports that what we are estimating is a response of the targeted family to the introduction of the child benefit and not a change in the fertility preferences of families with many children. Other changes (besides the reform) had a negative effect on the probability to have a child that was reversed only for the birth of fourth child among treated families due to the economic incentives created by the reform.

June 9, 2021

Does the Strength of Incentives Matter for Elected Officials? A Look at Tax Collectors

Sutirtha Bagchi

Page range: 967-1012

Abstract

In Pennsylvania local property taxes are collected by elected officials, known as tax collectors, whose compensation varies widely in both structure and level across municipalities. This paper analyses the existence of a pay-performance relationship for these officials. Using data on the percentage of property taxes that are actually collected at the municipal level, the paper finds that as the compensation tax collectors receive goes up, they collect more in taxes. This relationship is however true only for collectors who are compensated on a commission basis and not for collectors compensated on the basis of a flat salary.

June 7, 2021

Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects

Alessandro De Chiara, Elisabetta Iossa

Page range: 1013-1034

Abstract

We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps to attract more participants but causes an increase in the requested funds. A higher budget cap is optimal when the preferences of researchers and the funding agency are more congruent, competition is lower, targeted projects have larger social value, the cost of public funds is smaller, or bidding preparation costs are lower.

June 23, 2021

Can Unconditional In-Kind Transfers Keep Children Out of Work and in School? Evidence from Indonesia

Danusha Jayawardana, Nadezhda V. Baryshnikova, Ngoc Thien Anh Pham

Page range: 1035-1065

Abstract

Child labour is a global issue which creates a need for evidence-based interventions such as cash and in-kind transfers. However, there is limited evidence about the effect of in-kind transfers on child labour, impeding policy development. We address this gap by examining the impacts of an unconditional in-kind transfer, a nation-wide subsidised rice program, on child labour and schooling using longitudinal household survey data from Indonesia. To identify the causal effect, we use coarsened exact matching with difference-in-differences estimator. The results indicate that the program is effective in decreasing the probability of working for boys though it does not have a significant impact on the probability of schooling. However, as an unconditional in-kind transfer, its ability to decrease child work for boys, especially of those who are both working and attending school, provides an important policy implication on how a food subsidy program can indirectly influence child wellbeing.

June 23, 2021

Anti-Mafia Law Enforcement and Lending in Mafia Lands. Evidence from Judicial Administration in Italy

Francesca M. Calamunci, Marco Alberto De Benedetto, Damiano Bruno Silipo

Page range: 1067-1106

Abstract

The paper analyses the impact of a preventive measure aimed at fighting the criminal organizations’ activities on the bank-firm relationship in the four Italian regions with the highest density of mafia over the period 2004–2016. Taking advantage of the staggered firm-level anti-mafia enforcement actions, we implement a difference-in-differences approach and find that after entering judicial administration mafia-infiltrated firms experience a 19 per cent contraction of bank credit and have a higher probability of being credit rationed than a matched sample of legal companies. We also find that firms confiscated from the mafia experience a negative change in some demand-driven (value of production) and supply-driven (profitability) determinants of loans. Finally, we study whether confiscation of infiltrated firms produces externalities on non-infiltrated companies, and show that banks do not reassess the overall credit risk in local markets.

Open Access June 24, 2021

The Gender Wage Gap among Ph.D. Holders: Evidence from Italy

Vincenzo Alfano, Lorenzo Cicatiello, Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta, Mauro Pinto

Page range: 1107-1148

More Download PDF

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature on the gender wage gap by empirically analyzing those workers who hold the highest possible educational qualification, i.e., a Ph.D. The analysis relies on recent Italian cross-sectional data collected through a survey on the employment conditions of Ph.D. holders. The Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis and quantile decomposition analysis are carried out, and the selection of Ph.D. holders into employment and STEM/non-STEM fields of specialization is taken into account. Findings suggest that a gender gap in hourly wages exists among Ph.D. holders, with sizeable differences by sector of employment and field of specialization.

Letters

Open Access March 8, 2021

Political Budget Cycle, Tax Collection, and Yardstick Competition

Massimiliano Ferraresi

Page range: 1149-1161

More Download PDF

Abstract

This paper exploits the political cycle of Italian municipalities to test for the presence of strategic interactions in the collection of local taxation. The revenue from the personal income tax surcharge—a tax tool of low salience—is (positively) plagued by political manipulation and is found to be a strategic complement, but only when mayors run for re-election, a finding consistent with the yardstick competition hypothesis. More salient fiscal tools, such as property tax and user fees and charges, are also (negatively) affected by budget cycles, but they do not appear to be spatially correlated.

April 26, 2021

Impacts of Jobs Requiring Close Physical Proximity and High Interaction with the Public on U.S. Industry Employment Change During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Todd Gabe, Richard Florida

Page range: 1163-1172

Abstract

This paper examines the factors affecting U.S. industry employment change in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results show that the percentage of industry employment in occupations that require close physical proximity has a negative effect on year-over-year employment change in the six months of April through September of 2020. On the other hand, the percentage of industry employment in jobs that involve high interaction with the public has a negative effect on year-over-year employment change in April and May, but not in the months of June to September. These different results related to physical proximity and interaction with the public are driven, in part, by the uneven impacts of COVID-19 on hospitality and retail businesses.

June 7, 2021

Quality, Location and Collusion under Spatial Price Discrimination

John S. Heywood, Zheng Wang

Page range: 1173-1183

Abstract

We present the first demonstration of the influence of a quality rivalry on location choices under spatial price discrimination. The rivalry is shown to generate the socially efficient quality but to push locations inefficiently close together, a result not found under Hotelling pricing. We apply this new equilibrium to the anti-trust policy issue of collusion showing that introducing the quality rivalry reduces the likelihood of collusion.

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Volume 21 (2021)

Volume 20 (2020)

Volume 19 (2019)

Volume 18 (2018)

Volume 17 (2017)

Volume 16 (2016)

Volume 15 (2015)

Volume 14 (2014)

Volume 13 (2013)

Volume 12 (2012)

Volume 11 (2011)

Volume 10 (2010)

Volume 9 (2009)

Volume 8 (2008)

Volume 7 (2007)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 5 (2006)

Volume 4 (2005)

Volume 1 (2005)

Issue 1

Volume 3 (2004)

Volume 2 (2003)

Issue 1

5-year Impact Factor	0.717
Cite Score	0.9
European Reference Index for the Humanities
Impact Factor	0.667
Journal Citation Indicator	0.23
SCImago Journal Rank	0.310
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.566

Submit

Submission
You can easily submit your manuscript online. Simply go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dgbejeap and you will be guided through the whole peer-reviewing and publishing process.

Your benefits of publishing with us

Rapid online publication ahead-of-print with short turnaround times
High quality manuscript processing through ScholarOne Manuscripts®
Optional open access publication
Accepted papers will be published online first as DOI-citable, forward-linked articles for quickest possible visibility for the scientific community
Every article easily discoverable because of SEO and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Convenient citation tracking via e-mail alert
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing support
No article processing charges or publication fees

Submission process

Submission of your paper via our submission management tool
Peer review process (you will be guided through every step)
Fast decision on your paper
If accepted: you have the option to publish it open access

In the interest of a fast track from submission to publication, there will be no major revision rounds for letters. BEJEAP will either accept manuscripts (subject to editorial revisions), invite minor revisions, or reject manuscripts without a detailed referee report. Submitted letters should hence be ready for publication if accepted for publication by the editors.

Please note

Manuscripts must be written in clear and concise English
Before submitting your article please have a look at our Information for Authors and copyright agreement
Once your article is accepted you have the option to publish it open access
Our repository policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract.
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Editorial

Editors-in-Chief
Sandra Ludwig, Ulm University, Germany
Hendrik Schmitz, Paderborn University, Germany

Editors
Francesca Barigozzi, University of Bologna, Italy
Johann K. Brunner, University of Linz, Austria
Robert Fleck, Clemson University, USA
Giovanni Mastrobuoni, Collegio Carlo Alberto, University of Turin, Italy
Mariapia Mendola, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
Till Requate, Kiel University, Germany
Frans de Vries, University of Aberdeen Business School, UK
Tobias Wenzel, University of Sheffield, UK

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 1935-1682
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter
First published: November 1, 2001
Publication Frequency: 4 Issues per Year
Audience: researchers in the field of economic analysis and policy