Published since November 1, 2001

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

ISSN: 1935-1690

Editors-in-chief: Arpad Jeno Abraham, Tiago Cavalcanti

Edited by: Eva Carceles-Poveda, Juan Carlos Hatchondo, Evi Pappa, Felipe Schwartzman, Pengfei Wang

Impact Factor: 0.500

About this journal

Objective
The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (BEJM) publishes significant research and scholarship in both theoretical and applied macroeconomics. The journal’s mandate is to assemble papers from the broad research spectrum covered by modern macroeconomics. The range of topics includes business cycle research, economic growth, and monetary economics, as well as topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between macroeconomics and international economics, labor economics, finance, development economics, political economy, public economics, and econometric theory.

For free online access to all articles, please register on our website. To access the articles, simply click on “Get access to full text” on any article you wish to view.

Topics

Political Economics
Macroeconomics
International economics
Labor economics
Finance
Development economics
Political economy
Public economics
Econometric theory

Article formats
Original research articles

Information on submission process

Your Benefits

Your benefits

Most significant research on theoretical and applied macroeconomics
Thorough selection of articles
Internationally recognized editorial board boosting the prestige of published articles
Quick access to issues thanks to ahead of print publishing

History

One issue/year, updated continuously
Content available since 2001 (Volume 1, Issue 1)
ISSN: 1935-1690

Abstracting and Indexing

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics is covered by the following services:

ABDC - Australian Business Deans Council
Academic Journal Guide (CABS, UK)
AGRICOLA (National Agricultural Library)
Baidu Scholar
Cabells Journalytics
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
EconBiz
ECONIS
EconLit
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest)
J-Gate
Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet)
Microsoft Academic
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Topics

External Links

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Volume 21 Issue 2

June 2021

Accessible July 15, 2021

Frontmatter

Page range: i-ii

Download PDF

Contributions

November 30, 2020

Occupational Choice and Investments in Human Capital in Informal Economies

Lucila Berniell

Page range: 399-423

Abstract

Informality is pervasive in many developing countries and it can affect occupational and educational decisions. Cross-country data shows that the rate of entrepreneurship as well as the gap between the skill premium for entrepreneurs and for workers increase with the size of the informal economy. Also, in countries with larger informal sectors the fraction of high-skilled individuals that choose to be entrepreneurs is larger. To explain these facts, I develop a model economy with human capital investments, occupational choice and an informal sector, in which the investment in human capital improves the efficiency of labor as well as managerial skills, and the technology to produce goods exhibits capital-skill complementarity. Model predictions can account for cross-country evidence and also shed light on the mechanisms at work when the level of informality in the economy increases. In particular, a higher level of informality discourages human capital investments for workers while it incentivizes these investments for the case of some managers, mostly informal but talented.

October 30, 2020

Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy

Tzu-Yu Lin

Page range: 425-447

Abstract

In this paper, we first use a structural vector autoregression model to examine whether the US economy responds asymmetrically to expansionary and contractionary monetary policies. The empirical results show that monetary policy has significant asymmetric effects on output and investment. To provide an explanation of such asymmetries, we consider a nonlinear dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model in which collateral constraints are occasionally binding over the business cycle. The nonlinear DSGE model is able to match the empirical findings that macroeconomic aggregates react asymmetrically to positive and negative monetary policy shocks.

November 23, 2020

Trend Growth and Robust Monetary Policy

Kohei Hasui

Page range: 449-472

Abstract

Recent monetary policy studies have shown that the trend productivity growth has non-trivial implications for monetary policy. This paper investigates how trend growth alters the effect of model uncertainty on macroeconomic fluctuations by introducing a robust control problem. We show that an increase in trend growth reduces the effect of the central bank’s model uncertainty and, hence, mitigates the large macroeconomic fluctuations. Moreover, the increase in trend growth contributes to bringing the economy into determinacy regions even if larger model uncertainty exists. These results indicate that trend growth contributes to stabilizing the economy in terms of both variance and determinacy when model uncertainty exists.

December 10, 2020

Delegating Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia in a Small-Open Economy

Daisuke Ida, Mitsuhiro Okano

Page range: 473-507

Abstract

This paper explores the delegation of several targeting regimes in a small open new Keynesian (NK) model and examines how central banks overcome stabilization bias in a small open NK model. Results indicate that both speed limit and real exchange rate targeting can carry the isomorphic properties of optimal monetary policy over to the closed economy. In addition, neither nominal income growth targeting nor CPI inflation targeting replicates a commitment policy. These findings provide new implications for optimal monetary policy in an open economy.

Open Access April 12, 2021

Dating Structural Changes in UK Monetary Policy

Vincenzo De Lipsis

Page range: 509-539

More Download PDF

Abstract

The UK historical monetary policy experience is rich of institutional changes, but it remains unclear which of these many events dominated the policy actions and what timing characterised the inception of different policy regimes. We develop a new empirical approach to answer these questions and we identify in particular the historical institutional events that effectively translated into a shift of the systematic actions of the UK monetary authorities. We find that not all institutional events triggered a contemporaneous change in the actual policy conduct, although a coherent evolution in phases is evident since 1978, when a significant monetary policy rule emerges. These occasional but not sporadic regime changes explain a considerable share of the movements in the official interest rate, as well as an overstatement of the importance of policy inertia.

April 9, 2021

International Historical Evidence on Money Growth and Inflation: The Role of High Inflation Episodes

Michele Fratianni, Marco Gallegati, Federico Giri

Page range: 541-564

Abstract

How long is the long run in the relationship between money growth and inflation? How important are high inflation episodes for the unit slope finding in the quantity theory of money? To answer these questions, we study the relationship between excess money growth and inflation over time and across frequencies using annual data from 1870 to 2013 for 16 developed countries. Wavelet-based exploratory analysis shows the existence of a close stable relationship between excess money growth and inflation only over long time horizons, i.e. periods greater than 16–24 years, with money growth mostly leading. When we investigate the sensitivity of the unit slope finding to inflation episodes using a “time-frequency-based” panel data approach, we find that low-frequency regression coefficients estimated over variable-length subsamples are largely affected by high inflation episodes occurring in the 1910s, the 1940s, and the 1970s. Taken together, our results suggest that inflationary upsurges affect regression coefficients, but not the closeness of the long-run relationship. This reconciles the validity of the quantity theory of money with the current disinterest of monetary policymaking in money growth.

April 9, 2021

Inequality, Growth, and Congestion Externalities

Babatunde Aiyemo, AKM Mahbub Morshed

Page range: 565-606

Abstract

We describe and numerically simulate the aggregate and distributional properties of an endogenous growth model with an infrastructure externality which is subject to relative congestion. We show that the congested externality induces higher growth, greater inequality, labor/leisure trade-off ambiguities and an ineffective capital income tax for the government to achieve long-term redistribution goals. We demonstrate the economic implications of congestions in production and consumption externalities on the public to private capital ratio, growth and income distribution. Finally, we discuss alternative tax options for promoting inclusive growth.

Open Access April 12, 2021

The Neoclassical Growth Model and the Labor Share Decline

Zachary L. Mahone, Joaquín Naval, Pau S. Pujolas

Page range: 607-628

More Download PDF

Abstract

The labor share may be declining in the data, but it is often assumed constant in neoclassical growth models (NGM). We assess the quantitative importance of this discrepancy by comparing alternative calibration approaches featuring constant and declining labor shares. We find little difference in model performance. Our results derive from strong general equilibrium effects: while a declining labor share mechanically lowers wage growth, the investment response pushes wages back up. Hence, different models deliver nearly identical paths of macro aggregates. Numerous robustness checks (including a CES production function, different time periods, and calculations of the labor share) reinforce the similarity of performance across model specifications. We conclude that the NGM with a constant labor share is still an appropriate choice to study many standard macro aggregates.

April 23, 2021

Environmental Taxes and Economic Growth with Multiple Growth Engines

Hamid Beladi, Ping-ho Chen, Hsun Chu, Mei-ying Hu, Ching-chong Lai

Page range: 629-658

Abstract

We develop an endogenous growth model in which long-run growth is driven by three engines: private abatement R&D, expanding-variety R&D, and capital accumulation. We show that an environmental tax activates private abatement by directing researchers from the variety R&D sector to the abatement R&D sector, which helps the economy avoid the environmental disaster. Our results also show that the effect of the environmental tax on long-run growth is uncertain, depending mainly on the relative productivity between the two R&D sectors. If the abatement R&D sector is sufficiently productive, increasing the environmental tax will enhance the balanced output growth rate and social welfare.

May 14, 2021

Macrodynamic Modeling of Innovation Equilibria and Traps

Edgar J. Sanchez-Carrera, Sebastian Ille, Giuseppe Travaglini

Page range: 659-694

Abstract

We study the interplay between the decision of firms to innovate and human capital. Based on a dynamic evolutionary model, we show that in the presence of a high stock of human capital, an advanced economy can remain caught in an “innovation trap”. Following the literature on endogenous growth, R&D investments and human capital are modeled as strategic complements. Skilled workers increase productivity and enjoy a wage premium if they are employed in the R&D sector, while they receive the same wage as unskilled workers if they are employed in the production sector. We model the evolutionary dynamics of the share of innovative firms and human capital to determine the conditions under which an economy converges to a high, low or mixed state of innovation.

Advances

February 19, 2021

Unraveling News: Reconciling Conflicting Evidence

Maria Bolboaca, Sarah Fischer

Page range: 695-743

Abstract

This paper addresses the lack of consensus in the empirical literature regarding the effects of technology diffusion news shocks. We attribute the conflicting evidence to the wide diversity in terms of variable settings, productivity series used, and identification schemes applied. We analyze the different identification schemes that have been employed in this literature. More specifically, we impose short- and medium-run restrictions to identify a news shock. The focus is on the medium-run identification maximizing at and over different horizons. We show that the identified news shock depends critically on the applied identification scheme and on the maximization horizon. We also investigate the importance of the information content of the model and of the productivity measure used. We find that models which either contain a large set of macroeconomic variables or include variables that are strongly forward looking deliver more robust results. Moreover, we show that the productivity series used may influence results, but there is convergence of findings for newer total factor productivity series vintages. Our conclusion is that news shocks have expansionary properties.

February 5, 2021

Did the FED React to Asset Price Bubbles?

Marc-Andre Luik, Dennis Wesselbaum

Page range: 745-772

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) reacted to asset price bubbles before the Great Recession and whether this affected macroeconomic variables. We estimate a DSGE model featuring a financial accelerator and a process for asset price bubbles with different Taylor-rule specifications. We find that a Taylor-rule with a feedback to Tobin’s Q and bubble shocks fits best. Our findings suggest that the FED followed a cleaning rather than a leaning approach prior to the global financial crisis (GFC). Then, we perform a counterfactual analysis and show that this policy created a lower interest rate prior to the GFC compared to a standard Taylor-rule without feedback to financial variables.

February 17, 2021

Agricultural Trade and Structural Change: Evidence from Paraguay

Cesar Blanco

Page range: 773-799

Abstract

We study how international trade affects structural change in an agricultural exporting country. For this purpose, we calibrate a three-sector growth model to quantify the role of international trade in explaining structural change patterns observed in Paraguay. This country experienced a significant rise in net agricultural exports as a percentage of aggregate output during the period 1962–2012. We find the following results. First, international trade is crucial to explain the sectoral composition of employment in this country. The model including trade explains 84.2% of observed changes in employment shares during this period, while the model without trade can only account for 35.6% of observed changes. Second, employment in agriculture remains large in order to satisfy foreign demand. Third, employment shifts directly from agriculture into services in the long run, bypassing manufacturing. These patterns can only be explained by the rise in net agricultural exports.

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Volume 21 (2021)

Volume 20 (2020)

Volume 19 (2019)

Volume 18 (2018)

Volume 17 (2017)

Volume 16 (2016)

Volume 15 (2015)

Volume 14 (2014)

Issue 1

Volume 13 (2013)

Issue 1

Volume 12 (2012)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 2 (2006)

Issue 1

Volume 5 (2005)

Issue 1

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 1 (2004)

Volume 3 (2003)

Issue 1

5-year Impact Factor	0.725
Cite Score	0.9
Impact Factor	0.500
Journal Citation Indicator	0.24
SCImago Journal Rank	0.287
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.717

Submit

Submission
You can easily submit your manuscript online. Simply go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dgbejm and you will be guided through the whole peer reviewing and submission process.

Your benefits of publishing with us

Easy-to-use online submission, peer review, and publication system
Quality rating: Authors no longer need to trade off submitting to a more prestigious journal at the cost of an increased chance of rejection. We simultaneously consider each article for four different tiers distinguished by breadth of appeal and overall quality
Authors & Reviewers’ Bank: Scholars enter a social contract to review other papers in a timely manner so their own papers are reviewed rapidly. Strong incentives for timely, quality reviews solve the free-rider problem
Top-caliber reviews: Reviewers who write especially insightful reviews will be invited by editors to publish them as comments. Reviewers can send questions to authors by anonymous email, so reviewers are less likely to misunderstand authors, and authors are more likely to avoid confused writing
Widely disseminated: Readers worldwide have access to your paper at their desktops. More than 77,000 scholars receive email notification of new articles in BEJM, and over 350 institutions subscribe, including all of the top 20
Widely indexed: (among others) in EconLit, JEL, IBSS, RePEc, and Scopus. The full text is crawled and indexed by search engines like Google
Every article easily discoverable because of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing activities

Submission process

Submission of your paper via our submission management tool (you will be guided through every step of the submission process). Please, go to Online Submission of Manuscripts

Please note

Before submitting your article please have a look at Ethical Guidelines and our Copyright Transfer Agreement
Once your article is accepted you have the option to publish it open access
Our Repository Policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Editorial

Editors-in-Chief
Arpad Abraham, University of Bristol, UK
Tiago Cavalcanti, University of Cambridge, UK

Associate Editors
Eva Carceles-Poveda, Stony Brook University, USA
Juan Carlos Hatchondo, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Evi Pappa, University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain
Felipe Schwartzman, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, USA
Peng-Fei Wang, Peking University HSBC Business School, China

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 1935-1690
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter
First published: November 1, 2001
Publication Frequency: 2 Issues per Year
Audience: Researchers and practitioners interested in the topic of BEJM