Published since November 1, 2001

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics

ISSN: 1935-1690

Editors-in-chief: Arpad Jeno Abraham, Tiago Cavalcanti

Edited by: Eva Carceles-Poveda, Juan Carlos Hatchondo, Evi Pappa, Felipe Schwartzman, Pengfei Wang

Impact Factor: 0.233

About this journal

Objective
The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (BEJM) publishes significant research and scholarship in both theoretical and applied macroeconomics. The journal’s mandate is to assemble papers from the broad research spectrum covered by modern macroeconomics. The range of topics includes business cycle research, economic growth, and monetary economics, as well as topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between macroeconomics and international economics, labor economics, finance, development economics, political economy, public economics, and econometric theory.

For free online access to all articles, please register on our website. To access the articles, simply click on “Get access to full text” on any article you wish to view.

Topics

Political Economics
Macroeconomics
International economics
Labor economics
Finance
Development economics
Political economy
Public economics
Econometric theory

Article formats
Original research articles

Information on submission process

Your Benefits

Your benefits

Most significant research on theoretical and applied macroeconomics
Thorough selection of articles
Internationally recognized editorial board boosting the prestige of published articles
Quick access to issues thanks to ahead of print publishing

History

One issue/year, updated continuously
Content available since 2001 (Volume 1, Issue 1)
ISSN: 1935-1690

Abstracting and Indexing

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics is covered by the following services:

ABDC Journal Quality List
Academic Journal Guide (CABS, UK)
AGRICOLA (National Agricultural Library)
Baidu Scholar
Cabells Journalytics
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
EconBiz
ECONIS
EconLit
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest)
J-Gate
Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet)
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics): IDEAS, EconPapers
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Topics

External Links

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Volume 22 Issue 2

June 2022

Publicly Available June 30, 2022

Frontmatter

Page range: i-iv

Download PDF

Advances

Publicly Available May 18, 2021

Uncertainty, Financial Markets, and Monetary Policy over the Last Century

Sangyup Choi, Chansik Yoon

Page range: 397-434

More Download PDF

Abstract

What has been the effect of uncertainty shocks in the U.S. economy over the last century? What are the roles of the financial channel and monetary policy channel in propagating uncertainty shocks? Our empirical strategies enable us to distinguish between the effects of uncertainty shocks on key macroeconomic and financial variables transmitted through each channel. A hundred years of data further allow us to answer these questions from a novel historical perspective. This paper finds robust evidence that financial conditions captured by both borrowing costs and the availability of credit have played a crucial role in propagating uncertainty shocks over the last century. However, heightened uncertainty does not necessarily amplify the adverse effect of financial shocks, suggesting an asymmetric interaction between uncertainty and financial shocks. Interestingly, the monetary policy stance seems to play only a minor role in propagating uncertainty shocks, which is in sharp contrast to the recent claim that binding zero-lower-bound amplifies the negative effect of uncertainty shocks. We argue that the contribution of constrained monetary policy to amplifying uncertainty shocks is largely masked by the joint concurrence of binding zero-lower-bound and tightened financial conditions.

Publicly Available September 15, 2021

Collateral Constraints, Wage Rigidity, and Jobless Recoveries

Tobias Föll

Page range: 435-480

More Download PDF

Abstract

The Great Recession has drawn attention to the importance of macro-financial linkages. In this paper I explore the joint role of imperfections in labor and financial markets for the cyclical adjustment of the labor market. I show that jobless recoveries emerge when, upon exiting a recession, firms are faced with deteriorating credit conditions. On the financial side, collateral requirements affect the cost of borrowing for firms. On the employment side, hiring frictions and wage rigidity increase the need for credit, making the binding collateral constraint more relevant. In a general equilibrium business cycle model with search and matching frictions, I illustrate that tightening credit conditions calibrated from data negatively affect employment adjustments during recovery periods. Wage rigidity substantially amplifies this mechanism, generating empirically plausible fluctuations in employment and output.

November 12, 2021

Revisiting the Link between House Prices and Monetary Policy

Shiu-Sheng Chen, Tzu-Yu Lin

Page range: 481-515

Abstract

This paper revisits the link between house prices and monetary policy using a data set on house prices provided by the Bank for International Settlements. It is found that a loose monetary policy unambiguously results in a rise in real house prices, and such an increase is statistically significant for 19 of the 20 countries studied here. Empirical results also show that for some countries (Belgium, Canada, Switzerland, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, and South Africa), the interest rate shock can explain a large percentage of real house price movements. The response of house prices to monetary policy shocks varies between countries, and the strength of the relationship between house prices and monetary policy can be associated with financial liberalization. On the other hand, evidence shows that interest rate shock plays an important role in explaining recent house price hikes for Australia, Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, the US, and South Africa. In particular, during 2002–2006, on average 24% of the house price hikes in the US can be attributed to monetary policy shocks. Finally, we also find evidence that central banks react to the housing market, particularly in those countries adopting a policy of inflation targeting.

November 16, 2021

Front-Loading Agricultural Subsidies: Quantifying Public Savings

Kai Ding, Filippo Rebessi

Page range: 517-545

Abstract

Reforms to agricultural policy have been stalling in OECD economies. In this paper, we quantify the potential for public savings from switching to an optimal transfer system in small open economies. Following the insights from the literature on repeated moral hazard, optimal subsidies are front-loaded, which provides stronger incentives for farmers to transition out of agriculture, compared to the existing policies. In our counterfactual experiments, we find government savings of 6% for Chile, 45% for Japan, 24% for Switzerland, and 51% for Turkey. In addition, optimal subsidies more than double the speed of the transition of employment out of agriculture.

Contributions

May 24, 2021

Equilibrium Tax Rates under Ex-ante Heterogeneity and Income-dependent Voting

Bo Hyun Chang, Yongsung Chang, Sun-Bin Kim

Page range: 547-573

Abstract

The standard models with incomplete markets (e.g. Aiyagari) have difficulty justifying the current income tax rates as an optimal or political equilibrium outcome. Given the highly skewed income distribution, the majority of the population would be in favor of raising taxes to a much higher level. We show that incorporating (i) the ex-ante heterogeneity of earnings and (ii) income-dependent voting behavior helps us to reconcile the large gap between the model and data.

June 16, 2021

Financial Reforms and Consumption Smoothing

Martin Boileau, Tianxiao Zheng

Page range: 575-611

Abstract

We study how financial reforms affect the extent of consumption smoothing in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of an emerging economy. Consistent with the empirical literature and reform efforts in South Korea and South Africa, we emphasize the relation between consumer credit and durable purchases, and model reforms as the relaxation of the collateral constraint on lower income households. We find that the relaxation of the collateral constraint accounts for a substantial share of the decline in consumption smoothing experienced in South Korea and South Africa.

June 23, 2021

The Government in SNA-Compliant DSGE Models

Gonzalo F. de-Córdoba, Benedetto Molinari, José L. Torres

Page range: 613-642

Abstract

The government size in developed economies expanded remarkably after the Second World War. This growth shaped the role of the government as a key player in the economic activity and the aggregate dynamics of a country. However, the way in which the government is represented in DSGE models is often reductive, containing homogeneous public spending and a few distortionary taxes without clear counterparts in fiscal data. This paper shows how dynamic general equilibrium models can incorporate a detailed government sector as defined in the System of National Accounts (SNA). This government features six types of public expenditures (i.e. the government’s intermediate consumption, public wage bill, debt service, public investment, and transfers to households both in-kind and other-than-in-kind), and five distortionary taxes (i.e. consumption tax, capital and labor income taxes, corporate tax and social contributions).

August 30, 2021

Accounting for the International Great Depression: Efficiency, Distortions and Factor Utilization during the Interwar Period

Alexander Klein, Keisuke Otsu

Page range: 643-697

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the International Great Depression (IGD) in the U.S. and Western Europe by applying the business cycle accounting method to a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with time-varying production efficiency and factor market distortions. We measure the size of labor and capital market distortions with endogenous factor utilization and their relative importance in accounting for output fluctuation during the interwar period. Our main findings are that labor market distortions accounted for two-thirds of the output drops in both the U.S. and Western Europe, endogenous factor utilization amplified the negative effects of labor market distortions, and government spending played an important role in the recovery from the Great Depression in European countries who left the Gold Standard in the early 1930s.

September 7, 2021

Assessing the Role of Sentiment in the Propagation of Fiscal Stimulus

Bijie Jia, Hyeongwoo Kim, Shuwei Zhang

Page range: 699-728

Abstract

This paper studies the dynamic effects of the fiscal policy shock on private activity using an array of vector autoregressive models for the post-war U.S. data . We are particularly interested in the role of consumer sentiment in the transmission of fiscal stimulus. Our major findings are as follows. Private spending fails to rise persistently in response to government spending shocks, while they exhibit persistent and significant increases when the sentiment shock occurs. Employing not only linear but also nonlinear state-dependent VAR model estimations, we show that the government spending shock generates consumer pessimism in all phases of business cycle resulting in subsequent decreases in private activity, which ultimately weakens the effectiveness of the fiscal policy. Our counterfactual simulation exercises confirm the important role of sentiment in propagating fiscal stimulus to private spending.

November 18, 2021

Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Multiplier in China

Fei Guo, Eric Evans Osei Opoku, Kate Hynes, Isabel Kit-Ming Yan

Page range: 729-763

Abstract

A fundamental aspect of China’s transition to a market economy is the change in fiscal decentralization marked by the tax reform in 1993. This paper examines the effect of revenue and expenditure decentralization and their divergences on fiscal spending multipliers in China using nationally aggregate and provincial-level data from 1978 to 2017. Our investigations show that expenditure decentralization weakens the efficacy of spending policies, while revenue decentralization enhances the efficacy. Moreover, the divergence of revenue and expenditure decentralization has significantly decreased the provincial spending multiplier, while its effect on the aggregate spending multiplier is insignificant. The provincial results are robust to the inclusion of off-budgetary expenditure and revenue, using different estimates of multipliers and different measures of fiscal decentralization, considering from a long-run perspective, and addressing the endogeneity issue.

November 25, 2021

Effect of Feed-In Tariff with Deregulation on Directed Technical Change in the Energy Sector

Minoru Nakada

Page range: 765-785

Abstract

In this study, we examine how a feed-in tariff (FIT) accompanied with deregulation in the energy sector affects the direction of technical change along the balanced growth path. A final good is composed of resource-saving (such as renewable) energy and traditional resource-intensive energy. The government introduces a FIT scheme for promoting resource-saving energy, while it deregulates the traditional energy sector for efficiency improvement. The implementation of the scheme positively affects directed technical change toward the resource-saving energy technology and economic growth. Meanwhile, the biased technical change leads to an upsurge in the surcharge. Associated deregulation not only accelerates the biased technical change but also drives the surge in the surcharge rate, unless the initial market structure of the traditional energy sector is highly concentrated.

December 3, 2021

Pay-as-You-Go Social Security and Educational Subsidy in an Overlapping Generations Model with Endogenous Fertility and Endogenous Retirement

Hung-Ju Chen, Koichi Miyazaki

Page range: 787-820

Abstract

This study analytically investigates the effects of pay-as-you-go social security and educational subsidies on the fertility rate, retirement age, and GDP per capita growth rate in an overlapping generations model, where parents invest resources toward their children’s human capital. We find that an old agent retires fully when his or her labor productivity is low and retires later when the labor productivity is high. Under the unique balanced-growth-path (BGP) equilibrium, when an old agent is still engaged in work, tax rates are neutral to the fertility rate, higher tax rates encourage him or her to retire earlier, a higher social security tax rate depresses the GDP per capita growth rate, and a higher tax rate for educational subsidies can accelerate growth. However, when an old agent fully retires, higher tax rates increase the fertility rate, a higher social security tax rate lowers the GDP per capita growth rate, and a higher tax rate for educational subsidies boosts growth. Additionally, if an old agent’s labor productivity increases, the fertility rate also increases. We also conduct numerical simulations and analyze how an old agent’s labor productivity affects the retirement age, fertility rate, and GDP per capita growth rate under the BGP equilibrium.

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Volume 22 (2022)

Volume 21 (2021)

Volume 20 (2020)

Volume 19 (2019)

Volume 18 (2018)

Volume 17 (2017)

Volume 16 (2016)

Volume 15 (2015)

Volume 14 (2014)

Issue 1

Volume 13 (2013)

Issue 1

Volume 12 (2012)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 2 (2006)

Issue 1

Volume 5 (2005)

Issue 1

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 1 (2004)

Volume 3 (2003)

Issue 1

5-year Impact Factor	0.565
Cite Score	0.7
Impact Factor	0.233
Journal Citation Indicator	0.14
SCImago Journal Rank	0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.369

Submit

Submission
You can easily submit your manuscript online. Simply go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dgbejm and you will be guided through the whole peer reviewing and submission process.

Your benefits of publishing with us

Easy-to-use online submission, peer review, and publication system
Quality rating: Authors no longer need to trade off submitting to a more prestigious journal at the cost of an increased chance of rejection. We simultaneously consider each article for four different tiers distinguished by breadth of appeal and overall quality
Authors & Reviewers’ Bank: Scholars enter a social contract to review other papers in a timely manner so their own papers are reviewed rapidly. Strong incentives for timely, quality reviews solve the free-rider problem
Top-caliber reviews: Reviewers who write especially insightful reviews will be invited by editors to publish them as comments. Reviewers can send questions to authors by anonymous email, so reviewers are less likely to misunderstand authors, and authors are more likely to avoid confused writing
Widely disseminated: Readers worldwide have access to your paper at their desktops. More than 77,000 scholars receive email notification of new articles in BEJM, and over 350 institutions subscribe, including all of the top 20
Widely indexed: (among others) in EconLit, JEL, IBSS, RePEc, and Scopus. The full text is crawled and indexed by search engines like Google
Every article easily discoverable because of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing activities

Submission process

Submission of your paper via our submission management tool (you will be guided through every step of the submission process). Please, go to Online Submission of Manuscripts

Please note

Before submitting your article please have a look at Ethical Guidelines and our Copyright Transfer Agreement
Once your article is accepted you have the option to publish it open access
Our Repository Policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Editorial

Editors-in-Chief
Arpad Abraham, University of Bristol, UK
Tiago Cavalcanti, University of Cambridge, UK

Associate Editors
Eva Carceles-Poveda, Stony Brook University, USA
Juan Carlos Hatchondo, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Evi Pappa, University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain
Felipe Schwartzman, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, USA
Peng-Fei Wang, Peking University HSBC Business School, China

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 1935-1690
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter
First published: November 1, 2001
Publication Frequency: 2 Issues per Year
Audience: Researchers and practitioners interested in the topic of BEJM