Published by De Gruyter

Volume 26 Issue 1

Issue of Human Affairs

Contents
Journal Overview

Editorial

Open Access February 3, 2016

Moral theory and natural, or social, disasters

Vasil Gluchman

Page range: 3-7

Download PDF

Article

Publicly Available February 3, 2016

Ideal and nonideal moral theory for disaster bioethics

Dónal O’Mathúna

Page range: 8-17

More Download PDF

Abstract

Moral theory has generally focused on resolving ethical dilemmas by identifying ethically sound options. Whether the focus is on consequences, duties, principles or virtues, ethical cases are often approached in ways that assume morally sound solutions can be found and followed. Such ‘ideal morality’ assumes that moral goodness is always possible, leaving people confident they have done the right thing. Such an approach becomes inadequate in disaster settings where any good solution is often difficult to see. This paper examines recent work on nonideal moral theory as a useful model for disaster bioethics. This approach views moral dilemmas as situations where no choice is ideal and every option involves some element of unavoidable wrongdoing. Rather than straining for ideal answers, this approach acknowledges that sometimes the lesser of two evils is the best that can be done. Such situations inevitably lead to feelings of regret or guilt, commonly encountered in discussions of disaster bioethics. This paper explores the practical implications of nonideal approaches for disaster responders working in tragic situations.

Article

Open Access February 3, 2016

Ethical decision making during disasters¹

Ján Kalajtzidis

Page range: 18-25

More Download PDF

Abstract

Neither in theory nor in practice does there exist a single model of decision making. It is very difficult to identify a model, or models, which would be most useful during and after a disaster. Within the disaster timeframe (a difficult and complex situation), specific moral dilemmas arise. All the decision making theories tend to be associated with different assumptions about human nature, the quality of the decisions made and the manner in which they are made. Different assumptions may result in different tools being used and subsequently different consequences. The paper will provide a general introduction to the ethical decision making model, and will suggest two ways in which decisions in ethics might be made. The paper will try to deepen the discussion, and suggest answers to questions such as which type of ethical decision making is better in a specific situation such as a disaster? Is there any need to use a different decision making model (from an ethical point of view) in a disaster than in another event? Nonetheless, the article does not provide explicit solutions to these questions, since providing them would require further investigation than is the aim of this paper.

Article

Publicly Available February 3, 2016

Why helping the victims of disasters makes me a better person: Towards an anthropological theory of humanitarian action

Eleni M Kalokairinou

Page range: 26-33

More Download PDF

Abstract

In this paper I examine which is the most appropriate moral theory for dealing with disaster bioethics contexts. It is pointed out that, contrary to what is usually believed, moral theories of right action cannot actually guide us in such difficult situations. Instead, it is claimed that a virtue ethics theory of an Aristotelian version, which gives emphasis not only on the virtuous person but also on the relevant developmental process of becoming virtuous, can provide us with the right theoretical framework for coping with the problems which the victims of such disastrous situations face.

Article

Open Access February 3, 2016

Ethics and disasters in the work of Albert Schweitzer

Katarína Komenská

Page range: 34-42

More Download PDF

Abstract

Traditional ethical frameworks are challenged in disaster settings as they are often too rigorous to be applied to such situations. Nonetheless, the role of moral theories in discussions on disasters should not be dismissed. Indeed, some of the ideas and concepts in traditional ethical frameworks and moral theories may be a source of inspiration in such debates. Therefore, the present paper presents the two main concepts in Albert Schweitzer’s philosophical thinking: the concept of cultural crisis and his understanding of ethics. These concepts form the basis of Schweitzer’s formulation of an ethics of the reverence for life as an answer to the cultural crisis and the need for a new ethics for a modern, humane civilisation. His thinking is reflected through the scope of disaster ethics and its potential to enrich discussions on disaster ethics is critically analysed.

Article

Open Access February 3, 2016

Moral theory and disaster

Viera Bilasová, Alexandra Smatanová

Page range: 43-51

More Download PDF

Abstract

Renewing the deontology tradition of moral obligation requires, especially in relation to catastrophe and disaster, a broader methodological perspective which would enable deontology to transcend its own limits. The demand for pluralistic research approaches brings with challenging requirements that have to be considered when shaping a hybrid moral theory that incorporates a proactive approach. The personalist approach to the individual, based on the principles of integrity, responsibility and solidarity and seeking the wellbeing of a person, may prove inspirational in shaping such a proactive approach.

Article

Publicly Available February 3, 2016

Disaster issues in non-utilitarian consequentialism (ethics of social consequences)¹

Vasil Gluchman

Page range: 52-62

More Download PDF

Abstract

The ethics of social consequences is a means of satisficing non-utilitarian consequentialism that can be used to approach disaster issues. The primary values in the ethics of social consequences are humanity, human dignity and moral rights, and these are developed and realized to achieve positive social consequences. The secondary values found in the ethics of social consequences include justice, responsibility, moral duty and tolerance. Their role and purpose is given by their ability to help achieve and realize moral good. Fair treatment within moral issues stems from applying primary as well as secondary values. The nature of these values cannot be determined exclusively in ordinary circumstances. However, in extraordinary circumstances (disasters), not all the requirements relating to the value structure of the ethics of social consequences need be considered in its entirety. In extraordinary circumstances, values are prioritised and realized. Primary values are realized prior to secondary ones. When prioritizing primary values, the realization of positive social consequences, or at least minimizing the negative social consequences, takes priority over other primary values. In disaster bioethics especially, it is often necessary to find a way to minimize the negative social consequences; thus, actions where positive social consequences are prevalent are preferred.

Article

Publicly Available February 3, 2016

Charlie Hebdo attacks in the light of Aquinas’ Doctrine of double effect and ignatieff’s lesser evil theory

Lukáš Švaňa

Page range: 63-72

More Download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study and analyse the Charlie Hebdo attacks from a methodological and an ethical perspective, concentrating generally, though in some cases indirectly, on the consequences of our actions and the motives behind them. The analysis examines the issues of liberties, freedoms and responsibilities in general and further applies these values to the phenomenon of terrorism in contemporary society. The primary goal of this study is to use the Thomas Aquinas doctrine of double effect and Michael Ignatieff’s lesser evil theory to appraise specific acts of terrorism. The article suggests that certain freedoms should be limited in democratic societies and thus ensure safety.

Article

Publicly Available February 3, 2016

Moral responsibility for natural disasters

Vilius Dranseika

Page range: 73-79

More Download PDF

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to explore the idea of human moral responsibility for (the outcomes) of natural disasters. First, I discuss the claim that there is often a human causal contribution to negative outcomes of even such paradigmatic natural disasters as earthquakes, typhoons, and volcano eruptions. Second, I attempt to move away from discussions attributing human causal responsibility to discussions attributing human moral responsibility for such outcomes (and to the obstacles to such attributions). I suggest that in most (perhaps even all) cases of moral responsibility for the outcomes of natural disasters moral responsibility is grounded in culpable negligence, including culpable failure to prevent the side-effects of our actions or omissions.

Article

Open Access February 3, 2016

Challenge of time as a moral imperative

Wendy Drozenová

Page range: 80-89

More Download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to consider how the dominant moral theories can be applied to the discourse of disaster situations. In specific times, specific values take priority. Therefore, this article will consider how moral theory deals with time. Kant’s moral philosophy has influenced ethics enormously, but rejects the idea of a temporal dimension in ethics; consequently, modern ethics has not devoted sufficient attention to the temporal dimension. Nonetheless, Kantian ethics established the basic principles of respect for human beings as ends in themselves, and for autonomy of rational beings; thus it cannot be ignored. In political decision-making, simply having good intentions does not suffice; they must be accompanied by responsibility. Both the ethics of consequentialism and virtue ethics (the virtue of wisdom) deal with responsibility for the future. Hans Jonas developed a concept of responsibility concerned particularly with the risks associated with new technologies and the ethical requirement to avoid disasters. “Uncertainty may be our permanent fate - which has moral consequences” (Jonas). Public policy should be precautionary. The ethics of disaster preparation planning is distinct from the ethics of disaster response planning.

About this journal

Postdisciplinary international journal for humanities and social sciences published in English by the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia. The underlying editorial strategy is to advance human self-understanding and communication via publishing innovative theoretical, interpretative, critical and historical contributions transcending traditional disciplinary and cultural frontiers.

Journal Homepage
www.humanaffairs.sk

Why subscribe and read

Brings together contributions from all traditional and non-traditional fields of humanities and social sciences which relate to crucial contemporary human affairs.

Why submit

Fast, fair, and constructive peer review and editing Language-correction services for authors.

Submit Article

Rejection Rate

30%

Human Affairs is committed to maximize free access to scientific knowledge. Therefore we enable free access to one Editors’ Choice paper in each issue, provide free access to the full content of the journal after 24 months from publishing and offer authors an option to publish their articles in an Open Access format (upon payment of an Article Publishing Charge). More information can be found under https://www.degruyter.com/cms/pages/oa-articles?lang=en.

Volume 26 Issue 1

Issue of Human Affairs

Moral theory and natural, or social, disasters

Ideal and nonideal moral theory for disaster bioethics

Abstract

Ethical decision making during disasters1

Abstract

Why helping the victims of disasters makes me a better person: Towards an anthropological theory of humanitarian action

Abstract

Ethics and disasters in the work of Albert Schweitzer

Abstract

Moral theory and disaster

Abstract

Disaster issues in non-utilitarian consequentialism (ethics of social consequences)1

Abstract

Charlie Hebdo attacks in the light of Aquinas’ Doctrine of double effect and ignatieff’s lesser evil theory

Abstract

Moral responsibility for natural disasters

Abstract

Challenge of time as a moral imperative

Abstract

Ethical decision making during disasters¹

Disaster issues in non-utilitarian consequentialism (ethics of social consequences)¹