The International Journal of Biostatistics

Published by De Gruyter

Volume 15 Issue 1 -

May 2019

Issue of The International Journal of Biostatistics

Submit manuscript

Contents
Journal Overview

April 16, 2019

Estimating the Population Average Treatment Effect in Observational Studies with Choice-Based Sampling

Zhiwei Zhang, Zonghui Hu, Chunling Liu

Article number: 20180093

Abstract

We consider causal inference in observational studies with choice-based sampling, in which subject enrollment is stratified on treatment choice. Choice-based sampling has been considered mainly in the econometrics literature, but it can be useful for biomedical studies as well, especially when one of the treatments being compared is uncommon. We propose new methods for estimating the population average treatment effect under choice-based sampling, including doubly robust methods motivated by semiparametric theory. A doubly robust, locally efficient estimator may be obtained by replacing nuisance functions in the efficient influence function with estimates based on parametric models. The use of machine learning methods to estimate nuisance functions leads to estimators that are consistent and asymptotically efficient under broader conditions. The methods are compared in simulation experiments and illustrated in the context of a large observational study in obstetrics. We also make suggestions on how to choose the target proportion of treated subjects and the sample size in designing a choice-based observational study.

Publicly Available April 16, 2019

Significance Tests for Boosted Location and Scale Models with Linear Base-Learners

Tobias Hepp, Matthias Schmid, Andreas Mayr

Article number: 20180110

More Download PDF

Abstract

Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) offer very flexible solutions to a wide range of statistical analysis problems, but can be challenging in terms of proper model specification. This complex task can be simplified using regularization techniques such as gradient boosting algorithms, but the estimates derived from such models are shrunken towards zero and it is consequently not straightforward to calculate proper confidence intervals or test statistics. In this article, we propose two strategies to obtain p -values for linear effect estimates for Gaussian location and scale models based on permutation tests and a parametric bootstrap approach. These procedures can provide a solution for one of the remaining problems in the application of gradient boosting algorithms for distributional regression in biostatistical data analyses. Results from extensive simulations indicate that in low-dimensional data both suggested approaches are able to hold the type-I error threshold and provide reasonable test power comparable to the Wald-type test for maximum likelihood inference. In high-dimensional data, when gradient boosting is the only feasible inference for this model class, the power decreases but the type-I error is still under control. In addition, we demonstrate the application of both tests in an epidemiological study to analyse the impact of physical exercise on both average and the stability of the lung function of elderly people in Germany.

January 15, 2019

Hazard Ratio Estimators after Terminating Observation within Matched Pairs in Sibling and Propensity Score Matched Designs

Tomohiro Shinozaki, Mohammad Ali Mansournia

Article number: 20170103

Abstract

Similar to unmatched cohort studies, matched cohort studies may suffer from the censoring of events prior to the end of follow-up. Moreover, in some matched-pair cohort studies, observation time is prematurely terminated immediately after the follow-up of his/her matched member is completed by an event or censoring. Although the follow-up termination within matched pairs may or may not change the hazard ratio estimators, when and how the change occurs has not been clarified. We study the change in the estimates of the hazard ratio conditional on matched pairs and/or covariates by considering two types of matched-pair designs in cohort studies—sibling pair matching and propensity score matching—in which termination can be naturally considered. If all possible confounders are shared within the matched pairs, after termination, a wide range of hazard ratio estimators coincides with that obtained from a stratified Cox model. If unshared confounders should be adjusted for in the analysis, however, such coincidence is not observed. Simulation studies on sibling designs with unshared confounders suggested that the pair-stratified covariate-adjusted Cox model for the hazard ratio conditional on matched pairs and covariates is generally preferred, for which termination does not deteriorate the estimation. Conversely, the comparison between stratifying or not stratifying on pair is a more subtle issue in propensity score matching which targets a marginal or covariate-conditional hazard ratio. Based on simulation studies considering Cox models after matching based on estimated propensity scores, we discourage pair-stratified analysis and termination, particularly after data collection.

Publicly Available December 15, 2018

Parametric Regression Analysis with Covariate Misclassification in Main Study/Validation Study Designs

Grace Y. Yi, Ying Yan, Xiaomei Liao, Donna Spiegelman

Article number: 20170002

More Download PDF

Abstract

Measurement error and misclassification have long been a concern in many fields, including medicine, administrative health care data, epidemiology, and survey sampling. It is known that measurement error and misclassification may seriously degrade the quality of estimation and inference, and should be avoided whenever possible. However, in practice, it is inevitable that measurements contain error for a variety of reasons. It is thus necessary to develop statistical strategies to cope with this issue. Although many inference methods have been proposed in the literature to address mis-measurement effects, some important issues remain unexplored. Typically, it is generally unclear how the available methods may perform relative to each other. In this paper, capitalizing on the unique feature of discrete variables, we consider settings with misclassified binary covariates and investigate issues concerning covariate misclassification; our development parallels available strategies for handling measurement error in continuous covariates. Under a unified framework, we examine a number of valid inferential procedures for practical settings where a validation study, either internal or external, is available besides a main study. Furthermore, we compare the relative performance of these methods and make practical recommendations.

February 6, 2019

The Performance of Fixed-Horizon, Look-Ahead Procedures Compared to Backward Induction in Bayesian Adaptive-Randomization Decision-Theoretic Clinical Trial Design

Ari M. Lipsky, Roger J. Lewis

Article number: 20180014

Abstract

Designing optimal, Bayesian decision-theoretic trials has traditionally required the use of computationally-intensive backward induction. While methods for addressing this barrier have been put forward, few are both computationally tractable and non-myopic, with applications of the Gittins index being one notable example. Here we explore the look-ahead approach with adaptive-randomization, with designs ranging from the fully myopic to the fully informed. We compare the operating characteristics of the look-ahead designed trials, in which decision rules are based on a fixed number of future blocks, with those of trials designed using traditional backward induction. The less-myopic designs performed well. As the designs become more myopic or the trials longer, there were disparities in regions of the decision space that are transition zones between continuation and stopping decisions. The more myopic trials generally suffered from early stopping as compared to the less myopic and backward induction trials. Myopic trials with adaptive randomization also saw as many as 28 % of their continuation decisions change to a different randomization ratio as compared to the backward induction designs. Finally, early stages of myopic-designed trials may have disproportionate effect on trial characteristics.

February 19, 2019

Variational Inference for Coupled Hidden Markov Models Applied to the Joint Detection of Copy Number Variations

Xiaoqiang Wang, Emilie Lebarbier, Julie Aubert, Stéphane Robin

Article number: 20180023

Abstract

Hidden Markov models provide a natural statistical framework for the detection of the copy number variations (CNV) in genomics. In this context, we define a hidden Markov process that underlies all individuals jointly in order to detect and to classify genomics regions in different states (typically, deletion, normal or amplification). Structural variations from different individuals may be dependent. It is the case in agronomy where varietal selection program exists and species share a common phylogenetic past. We propose to take into account these dependencies inthe HMM model. When dealing with a large number of series, maximum likelihood inference (performed classically using the EM algorithm) becomes intractable. We thus propose an approximate inference algorithm based on a variational approach (VEM), implemented in the CHMM R package. A simulation study is performed to assess the performance of the proposed method and an application to the detection of structural variations in plant genomes is presented.

March 21, 2019

A Joint Poisson State-Space Modelling Approach to Analysis of Binomial Series with Random Cluster Sizes

Guohua Yan, Renjun Ma, M. Tariqul Hasan

Article number: 20180090

Abstract

Serially correlation binomial data with random cluster sizes occur frequently in environmental and health studies. Such data series have traditionally been analyzed using binomial state-space or hidden Markov models without appropriately accounting for the randomness in the cluster sizes. To characterize correlation and extra-variation arising from the random cluster sizes properly, we introduce a joint Poisson state-space modelling approach to analysis of binomial series with random cluster sizes. This approach enables us to model the marginal counts and binomial proportions simultaneously. An optimal estimation of our model has been developed using the orthodox best linear unbiased predictors. This estimation method is computationally efficient and robust since it depends only on the first- and second- moment assumptions of unobserved random effects. Our proposed approach is illustrated with analysis of birth delivery data.

April 3, 2019

The Youden Index in the Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Context

Pablo Martínez-Camblor, Juan Carlos Pardo-Fernández

Article number: 20180060

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and their associated summary indices, such as the Youden index, are statistical tools commonly used to analyze the discrimination ability of a (bio)marker to distinguish between two populations. This paper presents the concept of Youden index in the context of the generalized ROC (gROC) curve for non-monotone relationships. The interval estimation of the Youden index and the associated cutoff points in a parametric (binormal) and a non-parametric setting is considered. Monte Carlo simulations and a real-world application illustrate the proposed methodology.

April 18, 2019

Double Poisson-Tweedie Regression Models

Ricardo R. Petterle, Wagner H. Bonat, Célestin C. Kokonendji, Juliane C. Seganfredo, Atamai Moraes, Monica G. da Silva

Article number: 20180119

Abstract

In this paper, we further extend the recently proposed Poisson-Tweedie regression models to include a linear predictor for the dispersion as well as for the expectation of the count response variable. The family of the considered models is specified using only second-moments assumptions, where the variance of the count response has the form μ+ϕμp$\mu + \phi \mu^p$, where µ is the expectation, ϕ and p are the dispersion and power parameters, respectively. Parameter estimations are carried out using an estimating function approach obtained by combining the quasi-score and Pearson estimating functions. The performance of the fitting algorithm is investigated through simulation studies. The results showed that our estimating function approach provides consistent estimators for both mean and dispersion parameters. The class of models is motivated by a data set concerning CD4 counting in HIV-positive pregnant women assisted in a public hospital in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Specifically, we investigate the effects of a set of covariates in both expectation and dispersion structures. Our results showed that women living out of the capital Curitiba, with viral load equal or larger than 1000 copies and with previous diagnostic of HIV infection, present lower levels of CD4 cell count. Furthermore, we detected that the time to initiate the antiretroviral therapy decreases the data dispersion. The data set and R code are available as supplementary materials.

May 18, 2019

Semiparametric Inference for Proportional Mean Past Life Model

Z. Mansourvar, M. Asadi

Article number: 20180020

Abstract

The mean past lifetime provides the expected time elapsed since the failure of a subject given that he/she has failed before the time of observation. In this paper, we propose the proportional mean past lifetime model to study the association between the mean past lifetime function and potential regression covariates. In the presence of left censoring, martingale estimating equations are developed to estimate the model parameters, and the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators are studied. To assess the adequacy of the model, a goodness of fit test is also investigated. The proposed method is evaluated via simulation studies and further applied to a data set.

About this journal

Objective
The International Journal of Biostatistics (IJB) seeks to publish new biostatistical models and methods, new statistical theory, as well as original applications of statistical methods, for important practical problems arising from the biological, medical, public health, and agricultural sciences with an emphasis on semiparametric methods. Given many alternatives to publish exist within biostatistics, IJB offers a place to publish for research in biostatistics focusing on modern methods, often based on machine-learning and other data-adaptive methodologies, as well as providing a unique reading experience that compels the author to be explicit about the statistical inference problem addressed by the paper. IJB is intended that the journal cover the entire range of biostatistics, from theoretical advances to relevant and sensible translations of a practical problem into a statistical framework. Electronic publication also allows for data and software code to be appended, and opens the door for reproducible research allowing readers to easily replicate analyses described in a paper. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received, as will articles applying sound statistical methods to practical problems.

Topics

Biostatistical methods and models
Statistical theory
Biostatistics computing and applications of statistical methods for important practical problems in the biological, medical, public health, and agricultural sciences

Article formats
Research and survey articles

Information on submission process

Submit Article