Published since January 1, 1963

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

ISSN: 0019-042X

Editor-in-chief: Xuesong (Andy) Gao

Impact Factor: 0.970

About this journal

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) is devoted to problems of general and applied linguistics in their various forms. IRAL's long-term interest lies in areas of research which concern first- and second-language acquisition (including sign language and gestural systems). Contributions are welcome on naturalistic and instructed language learning, language loss, bilingualism, language contact, pidgins and creoles, language for specific purposes, language technology, mother-tongue education, terminology and translation. The journal also features occasional thematic issues.

Back Issues

Details on availability and prices of recent back volumes and issues will be provided on request from customerservice@degruyter.com. All volumes of the majority of our journals* with the noted exception of the current volume are being offered by

Schmidt Periodicals GmbH, Bad Feilnbach
Tel.: (+49) 80 64 – 221
Fax: (+49) 80 64 – 557
Email: schmidt@periodicals.com
http://www.periodicals.com

(* For periodicals not included in this agreement, please refer to the distribution address provided by the link "Back Issues" on the homepage of the periodical.)

Abstracting and Indexing

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
BLL Bibliographie Linguistischer Literatur
Cabells Journalytics
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
Educational Research Abstracts Online
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
J-Gate
Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Linguistic Bibliography
Linguistics Abstracts Online
Microsoft Academic
MLA International Bibliography
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
OLC Linguistik
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Topics

External Links

Volume 59 Issue 4

November 2021

Accessible November 3, 2021

Frontmatter

Page range: i-iii

Download PDF

Research Articles

March 29, 2019

“How Dare You Have Another Relationship!”: An analysis of cross-cultural and interlanguage corrections

Ming-Fang Lin, Miao-Hsia Chang, Yu-Fang Wang

Page range: 449-489

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the speech act of correction produced by Chinese, Americans, and Chinese EFL learners. A total of 120 participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire with two major parts: a Scaled Response Questionnaire (SRQ) and a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). Elicited data were analyzed in terms of three perspectives: perception of face-threat, overall correction strategy use, and the use of external modifications. The results showed some similarities and differences between Chinese and Americans’ corrections. As for the EFL learners, they exhibited their interlanguage development in the perception and overall strategy use. In addition, instances of L1 pragmatic transfer were found in the learners’ use of some individual strategies and external modifications. Learners’ interlanguage development and L1 socio-cultural transfer demonstrated the multi-competence of the learners. The present study suggests that further instruction should be implemented to enrich L2 learners’ pragmatic repertoire for successful ELF communication.

April 10, 2019

Noticing without negotiation?: What L2 Spanish learners report hearing in peer-produced language

Meghann M. Peace

Page range: 491-515

Abstract

Peer interaction and corrective feedback are beneficial in promoting second language development (e. g. Lyster et al. 2013; Philp et al. 2014; Sato 2017; Sato and Lyster 2012). A prerequisite of providing feedback is that learners first be able to notice elements of their peers’ language. This study seeks to analyze the latter, examining what L2 Spanish learners report hearing in peer-produced language. Data came from notes taken during the task and a subsequent stimulated recall. Content was reported more than form, the verb phrase was noticed more than any other linguistic feature, and a portion of the learners’ comments consisted of mostly-accurate unsolicited feedback. The results may have been constrained by task specifics, assumed relative proficiency, and classroom experience. The formal study of a third language may have facilitated the learners’ ability to notice, even in the absence of attention-directing strategies. These results correspond with previous work in feedback and negotiation, but separating learner perceptions from interaction permitted a closer look at the first step involved in peer communication.

March 20, 2019

A Vygotskian approach to mediating learner intercultural competence during study abroad

Matthew E. Poehner, Michelle L. Pasterick

Page range: 517-541

Abstract

This study examines learner interaction with mediating resources designed to promote their intercultural competence (Byram, 2009; Deardorff, 2009) during study abroad that were made available to them through an online instructional space. In this way, the project offers a response to the challenges of students attempting to navigate a new cultural context without affordances characteristic of formal learning environments (i. e. an instructor, assigned readings, organized discussions). Undergraduate learners from a U. S. university foreign language program were enrolled in an online course organized according to principles of Vygotskian theory (2012), specifically the importance of abstract concepts and models for mediating thinking. Selected readings introduced learners to an intercultural communicative framework and discussions guided learners to reflect upon and interpret their experiences in light of ideas presented in the readings. Analysis of participant reflections and discussions reveal participant intercultural competence and ways in which it was mediated through the online course.

April 16, 2019

Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity

Gavin Bui

Page range: 543-567

Abstract

Although differentiating between fluency, accuracy and complexity, while assessing L2 task performance, is becoming a standard practice, lexical complexity as a distinctive area has received less attention in the task-based language teaching (TBLT) literature. This study re-examines previous frameworks of lexical complexity and investigates three lexical dimensions, lexical diversity, lexical sophistication and lexical density , using a structured 2 × 2 × 2 split-plot experimental design. The participants were divided into a non-planning group and a planning group and each group was further dichotomised into two proficiency levels. Each participant was assigned one familiar and one unfamiliar oral narrative task. The results show that one’s prior knowledge about a subject is associated with higher lexical diversity and sophistication, while pre-task planning promotes lexical density. The effects of proficiency seem to be largely overridden by the effects of prior knowledge and pre-task planning and show little impact on overall lexical performance. Interestingly, lexical diversity and lexical sophistication are independent of each other, and lexical density is moderately correlated with both lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. The results are discussed with reference to the Levelt model of speech production with some pedagogical implications on content-based language instruction. The exploration of the relationships between the lexical measures reveals a need for deeper and subtler characterisation of L2 lexical complexity.

February 27, 2019

A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity

Elissa Allaw

Page range: 569-604

Abstract

Learner corpora provide researchers with a rich pool of resources that can complement experimental studies. The purpose of the present paper is to provide task complexity researchers, for the first time, with further insight regarding interactive effects of task complexity, task type, task modality, and L1 background on linguistic and propositional complexity. Analyzing 720 intermediate-level (B1) written texts that were extracted from open access online language learning platform, the EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT) revealed that there was a significant interaction effect among task design features (task complexity, task type, and L1 background) that influenced linguistic and propositional complexity of written texts. This suggests that task complexity does not function in isolation of other task design features such as task type and L1 background.

April 15, 2021

Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives?

Anas Awwad, Rashed Alhamad

Page range: 605-627

Abstract

This study attempts to widen our understanding of how manipulating pressured online task planning affects L2 oral fluency. The principal aim of this study is to investigate the effect of reducing time pressure on L2 learners’ oral speech production while performing video-based narrative tasks in terms of fluency. The study adopted a video-based narrative task to elicit spoken data from forty secondary school students. Online planning was operationalised through slowing down the video clip in the + online planning condition. Measures of breakdown and repair fluency were adopted to capture learners’ oral fluency. The findings revealed that online planning had a positive effect on L2 oral fluency regarding the number of filled pauses. Whereas it had a negative impact on fluency regarding mean length of silent pauses. No effect was found regarding number of silent pauses and disfluencies. The results will be discussed and pedagogic implications will be proposed.

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Volume 59 (2021)

Volume 58 (2020)

Volume 57 (2019)

Volume 56 (2018)

Volume 55 (2017)

Volume 54 (2016)

Volume 53 (2015)

Volume 52 (2014)

Volume 51 (2013)

Volume 50 (2012)

Volume 49 (2011)

Volume 48 (2010)

Volume 47 (2009)

Volume 46 (2008)

Volume 45 (2007)

Volume 44 (2006)

Volume 43 (2005)

Volume 42 (2004)

Volume 41 (2003)

Volume 40 (2002)

Volume 39 (2001)

Volume 38 (2000)

Volume 37 (1999)

Volume 36 (1998)

Volume 35 (1997)

Volume 34 (1996)

Volume 33 (1995)

Volume 32 (1994)

Volume 31 (1993)

Volume 30 (1992)

Volume 29 (1991)

Volume 28 (1990)

Volume 27 (1989)

Volume 26 (1988)

Volume 22 (1984)

Volume 21 (1983)

Volume 20 (1982)

Issue 1-4

Volume 19 (1981)

Issue 1-4

Volume 18 (1980)

Issue 1-4

Volume 17 (1979)

Issue 1-4

Volume 16 (1978)

Issue 1-4

Volume 15 (1977)

Issue 1-4

Volume 14 (1976)

Volume 13 (1975)

Issue 1-4

Volume 12 (1974)

Issue 1-4

Volume 11 (1973)

Issue 1-4

Volume 10 (1972)

Issue 1-4

Volume 9 (1971)

Volume 8 (1970)

Volume 7 (1969)

Volume 6 (1968)

Issue 1-4

Volume 5 (1967)

Issue 1-4

Volume 4 (1966)

Issue 1-4

Volume 3 (1965)

Volume 2 (1964)

Issue Jahresband

Volume 1 (1963)

Issue Jahresband

5-year Impact Factor	1.631
Cite Score	1.0
European Reference Index for the Humanities
Impact Factor	0.970
Journal Citation Indicator	0.55
SCImago Journal Rank	0.318
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.552

Submit

1. Submitting an article for publication
Please submit your manuscript online to: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/iral.

Articles should aim to be about 8,000 words. Authors whose native language is not English are asked to have their article carefully checked by a native speaker.

2. Peer review
The journal operates a double-blind peer review that usually takes four months. Submissions are sent to 2 or 3 reviewers.

3. Formatting and style
Once accepted for publication, the author(s) will be required to submit the final version conforming to journal style. Please see the De Gruyter Mouton journal style sheet for details regarding journal style. Any special characters used should be labeled and clearly identified at their first occurrence. The Editor reserves the right to reject any articles that do not conform to the requirements.

4. Permissions
Copies of any letters granting permission to reproduce illustrations or tables from other sources, or lengthy quoted passages, must be supplied with the manuscript.

5. Proofs
Authors are asked to check their manuscripts very carefully before submitting them in order to prevent delays and extra costs at proofing. Authors will receive PDF proofs for correction which must be returned by dates given in the publication schedule.

6. Offprints
Upon publication, authors will receive electronic offprints (in PDF format) of their contribution. Guest editors of special issues will receive complimentary print copies of the issue.

Please note

Before submitting your article please have a look at our Publication Ethics Statement and our copyright agreement
Once your article is accepted you have the option to publish it open access.
Our repository policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for journal authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Hybrid Open Access

Authors have the option to publish their article under an open access license. The standard article processing charge for a hybrid open access article is 2,000 Euro (plus VAT if applicable). Please note that corresponding authors from institutions with which we have a transformative agreement, can publish open access without paying the fee. More information on the eligible institutions and articles can be found here.

Editorial

Editor

Xuesong (Andy) Gao
University of New South Wales
Sydney
Australia
e-mail: iral@degruyter.com

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 0019-042X
Print ISSN: 0019-042X
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
First published: January 1, 1963
Publication Frequency: 4 Issues per Year