Open Access Published by De Gruyter

Volume 22 Issue 1

Issue of Nietzsche-Studien

Submit manuscript

Contents
Journal Overview

May 25, 2010

NIETZSCHES DITHYRAMBUS „ZWISCHEN RAUBVÖGELN”

RICHARD SCHOTTKY

Page range: 1-27

May 25, 2010

HISTORIE ALS „VERSUCH DAS HERAKLITISCHE WERDEN [...] IN ZEICHEN ABZUKÜRZEN“

MARTIN STINGELIN

Page range: 28-41

May 25, 2010

BEHOLD NIETZSCHE

MICHAEL PLATT

Page range: 42-79

May 25, 2010

THE INFLUENCE OF MONTAIGNE ON NIETZSCHE: A RAISON D’ETRE IN THE SUN

DAVID MOLNER

Page range: 80-93

May 25, 2010

NIETZSCHES WAHRHEITSBEGRIFF IN SEINER SELBSTWIDERSPRÜCHLICHEN PROBLEMATIK

FLORIAN ROTH

Page range: 94-114

May 25, 2010

KANT, NIETZSCHE AND THE THING IN ITSELF

STEPHEN HOULGATE

Page range: 115-157

May 25, 2010

THE HERMENEUTICS OF IDEALISM: NIETZSCHE VERSUS THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

ADRIAN DEL CARO

Page range: 158-164

May 25, 2010

ZUR GENEALOGIE EINER „SCIENCE POSITIVE DE LA MORALE EN ALLEMAGNE“

HUBERT TREIBER

Page range: 165-221

May 25, 2010

OPFER UND MACHT ZU NIETZSCHES LEKTÜRE VON JACOB WACKERNAGELS „ÜBER DEN URSPRUNG DES BRAHMANISMUS“

MARCO BRUSOTTI

Page range: 222-242

May 25, 2010

DIE GESCHICHTLICHE ENTWICKLUNG DES FARBENSINNS UND DIE „LINGUISTISCHE ARCHÄOLOGIE” VON L. GEIGER UND H. MAGNUS: EIN KOMMENTAR ZUM APHORISMUS 426 VON MORGENRÖTHE

ANDREA ORSUCCI

Page range: 243-256

May 25, 2010

LA SUPERSTITION DES PHILOSOPHES CRITIQUES. Nietzsche et Afrikan Spir

PAOLO D'IORIO

Page range: 257-294

May 25, 2010

AUF DEN SPUREN DES LESERS FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE

HANS ERICH LAMPL

Page range: 295-303

May 25, 2010

NIETZSCHE IN ITALIEN

DOMENICO M. FAZIO

Page range: 304-319

May 25, 2010

EINE HISTORISCHE PERIPETIE VON NIETZSCHES DENKEN: LENIN ALS NIETZSCHE-LESER?

ALDO VENTURELLI

Page range: 320-330

May 25, 2010

WILLE ALS REIZ

HENRY KERGER

Page range: 331-354

May 25, 2010

NIETZSCHE AND POSTFEMINISM

DIANA BEHLER

Page range: 355-370

May 25, 2010

About this journal

Open Access

Starting 2022, Nietzsche-Studien will be transferred to Diamond Open Access on a year-by-year basis. All articles will thus appear without delay under the Creative Commons license CC-BY. There will be no publication costs for the authors. The Open Access transformation is based on Subscribe-to-Open.

The prerequisite for successful transformation is that subscriptions are continued to the same extent as before. The editors of Nietzsche-Studien and the publisher De Gruyter would therefore like to thank all subscribers for their support, which has made the transformation to Open Access possible.

You can find more information about the model here.

About the Yearbook

Friedrich Nietzsche has emerged as one of the most important and influential modern philosophers. Nietzsche-Studien is the premier publication shaping the field of Nietzsche studies. Interdisciplinary in orientation, and with a global reach, Nietzsche-Studien reflects the entire spectrum of research on Nietzsche, from philosophy to literary studies and political theory. By combining philosophical argument with historical context and textual precision, Nietzsche-Studien continues to set the agenda in the rapidly growing and changing field of Nietzsche scholarship.

An international team of editors whose work reflects the full range of current Nietzsche scholarship builds on the existing legacy of Nietzsche-Studien and expands the global reach of the journal. The chief editors of Nietzsche-Studien are supported by an advisory board of internationally renowned scholars from eleven countries, making Nietzsche-Studien unique in its global reach.　

Please follow the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript via ScholarOne: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nietzsche

For all queries, please contact us at Nietzsche-Studien@DeGruyter.com.

Corresponding book series "Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung": http://www.degruyter.com/view/serial/16098

Peer Review Policy

Nietzsche-Studien follows a double-blind peer review process:

Articles are submitted either by potential contributors directly or at the invitation of the journal editors. With the exception of commissioned book reviews and miscellaneous items that are directly reviewed by the editors, all research articles undergo a double-blind peer-review process.

If the editors agree that a submitted research article potentially merits publication, the article enters the peer-review process.

Research articles undergo a double-blind peer review, i.e., neither author(s) nor reviewers are aware of each other’s identities.

Research articles are usually reviewed by two referees. A third referee may be included if the reports submitted by the first two referees do not allow for a decision about the publication of a research article.

The peer review normally takes approximately four to six weeks, but in special circumstances, and depending on the volume of submissions, the allocated time can be extended.

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editors decide and communicate to the author(s) whether, and on which grounds, the submitted article is "accepted," requires "minor" or "major revisions," or has to be "rejected." In case revisions are necessary, all the referees’ suggestions and queries must be taken into consideration and authors must document their responses and changes.

The editors make a final decision about the publication of every research article once all revisions have been made. The editors reserve the right to initiate an additional peer-review process if they deem necessary.

Volume 22 Issue 1

Issue of Nietzsche-Studien

Titelei

NIETZSCHES DITHYRAMBUS „ZWISCHEN RAUBVÖGELN”

HISTORIE ALS „VERSUCH DAS HERAKLITISCHE WERDEN [...] IN ZEICHEN ABZUKÜRZEN“

BEHOLD NIETZSCHE

THE INFLUENCE OF MONTAIGNE ON NIETZSCHE: A RAISON D’ETRE IN THE SUN

NIETZSCHES WAHRHEITSBEGRIFF IN SEINER SELBSTWIDERSPRÜCHLICHEN PROBLEMATIK

KANT, NIETZSCHE AND THE THING IN ITSELF

THE HERMENEUTICS OF IDEALISM: NIETZSCHE VERSUS THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

ZUR GENEALOGIE EINER „SCIENCE POSITIVE DE LA MORALE EN ALLEMAGNE“

OPFER UND MACHT ZU NIETZSCHES LEKTÜRE VON JACOB WACKERNAGELS „ÜBER DEN URSPRUNG DES BRAHMANISMUS“

DIE GESCHICHTLICHE ENTWICKLUNG DES FARBENSINNS UND DIE „LINGUISTISCHE ARCHÄOLOGIE” VON L. GEIGER UND H. MAGNUS: EIN KOMMENTAR ZUM APHORISMUS 426 VON MORGENRÖTHE

LA SUPERSTITION DES PHILOSOPHES CRITIQUES. Nietzsche et Afrikan Spir

AUF DEN SPUREN DES LESERS FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE

NIETZSCHE IN ITALIEN

EINE HISTORISCHE PERIPETIE VON NIETZSCHES DENKEN: LENIN ALS NIETZSCHE-LESER?

WILLE ALS REIZ

NIETZSCHE AND POSTFEMINISM

BEITRÄGE ZUR QUELLENFORSCHUNG

SIGLEN

REGISTER

Sonstiges