Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 241 items :

  • Lucius Burckhardt x
  • Architecture x
Clear All
Politics, Landscape & Design

7 Jesko Fezer · Martin Schmitz The Work of Lucius Burckhardt Lucius Burckhardt was bold for he claimed that design is invisible. He was exasperating for he asked why landscape is beautiful. He was persistent for he doggedly asked who actually plans the plan- ning. He was egalitarian for he addressed issues such as “livability” and everyday life. He was provocative. He declared the night and dirt to be a focus of his research. He was realistic insofar as he es- tablished that to build or to design is a process. He was rebellious for he made a science out of

Geleitwort zur deutschen Ausgabe Von Lucius Burckhardt Obwohl sich die beiden "Werke nicht aufeinander beziehen, bedeuten für uns die Levittowner von Herbert Gans eine Antwort auf Jane Jacobs »Tod und Leben großer amerikanischer Städte«. Dabei haben wir die Unterschiede in der Methode nicht übersehen: während Jane Jacobs ihre Hypothesen argumentierend verteidigt und vorantreibt, schreibt Herbert Gans ein empirisch-soziologisches Buch. Aber beide Schriften haben das Lokalkolorit dessen, der in der von ihm beschriebenen Umgebung auch gelebt hat. Levittown

Lucius Burckhardt und Marcel Herbst Wachstum, Dichte und Flexibilität Ein Arbeitsbericht zu Planungen von Frank Gloor, Rolf Gutmann, Felix Schwarz, mit Lucius Burckhardt Die Planung wachsender Versorgungskerne Das Wachstum der Städte einerseits, andererseits der Wil le der stadtnahen Bevölkerung, an der städtischen Entwicklung teilzuhaben, führen heute zu einer beschleunigten Entwicklung an den Stadträndern. Zwei Pla- nungsaufträge haben die Architekten Schwarz & Gutmann und ihre Mit- arbeiter zu diesen Problemen geführt. Der vorliegende Vortrag greift

Architecture, Politics, and Mankind
Planning, Education, and Society
FREE ACCESS

Who Plans the Planning? Birkhäuser Basel Lucius Burckhardt Who Plans the Planning? Architecture, Politics, and Mankind edited by Jesko Fezer and Martin Schmitz Editors Martin Schmitz D-Berlin martin-schmitz.de lucius-burckhardt.org Jesko Fezer D-Berlin/Hamburg design.hfbk-hamburg.de Acquisitions Editor: David Marold, Birkhäuser Verlag, A-Vienna Content and Production Editor: Angelika Gaal, Birkhäuser Verlag, A-Vienna Translation from German into English: Jill Denton, D-Berlin Copyediting: Andreas Müller, D-Berlin Layout and typography: Ekke Wolf, A

325 Bibliography POLITICS Urban Planning and Democracy. (Stadtplanung und Demokratie) – In: Bauwelt 48/37, 1957. – In: Wer plant die Planung? Architektur, Politik und Mensch, Eds. Jesko Fezer/Martin Schmitz, Berlin 2004, pp. 19–25. – In: Lucius Burckhardt Writings. Re- thinking Man-made Environments. Politics, Landscape & Design, Jesko Fezer/Martin Schmitz (Eds.), Vienna/New York 2012, pp. 27–34. – In: Lucius Burckhardt: Il falso è l ’autentico. Politica, città, paesaggio, design, pedagogia. A cura di Gaetano Licata/Martin Schmitz, Macerata 2019, pp. 21

331 Biography Lucius Burckhardt (* Davos, 1925) gained a PhD in Basel then became a research assistant at the Social Research Center at Münster University in 1955. A guest lec- tureship at Ulm University of Applied Arts in 1959 was followed from 1961 to 1973 by several teaching assignments, including a guest lectureship in sociology at the Architecture Faculty of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich). He worked simultaneously as editor-in-chief of the journal Werk from 1962 to 1973, was First President of the German Werkbund from 1976 to

of the students’ canteen, if ever it is built, be used in-between times to prepare meals also for the neighborhood’s elderly and infirm, so obviating the need for them to 1 Lucius Burckhardt and Walter M. Förderer, Bauen – ein Prozeß [Construction—A Process], Verlag Arthur Niggli, Teufen 1968 46 demand a canteen of their own. But try pushing through a proposal of that sort! Not only is the single-purpose construction project a foregone conclusion, it also complies, politically, with modernism’s aesthetic dogma. A modern building is always a—no, in fact