POLITICALART: NO CONCLUSION
This leads to the question of the political potential of art. To my mind, this is a key
question in the intersections of the humanities and the social sciences: how do we situ-
ate the political of art elsewhere than in the thematic domain, which is so dangerously
close to propaganda? In more subtle and effective politicalart, a compelling narrative
unfolds, but not as a series of events told ›in the third person‹. Rather, the narrative is
performative, as the work stages an encounter between the work and the viewer. In
J.: Liberated Cinema: The Yugoslav Experience, Bloom-
ington: Indiana University Press 2002.
Harrison, Charles/Wood, Paul (eds.): Kunsttheorie im 20.Jahrhundert [2
volumes], Hamburg: Hatje Cantz 2003.
Horton, Andrew: “The Rise and Fall of the Partisan Film: Cinematic Per-
ceptions of a National Identity”, in: Film Criticism 12.2 (1987): 18-27.
Jelinek, Alana: This is not art, London et al.: I B Tauris & Co Ltd 2013.
Klanten, R. et al.: Art & agenda: Politicalart and activism, Berlin: Gestal-
Levi, Pavle: Disintegration in frames: Aesthetics and
Forensic Anthropology, hg. v.
Dennis C. Dirkmaat, Malden, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 639-648.
Fortress Europe (2015), »Immigrants Dead at Frontiers of Europe«, http://fortresseurope.
Grant, Stefanie (2011): »Recording and Identifying European Frontier Deaths«. In: Euro-
pean Journal of Migration and Law 13: 2, 135-156.
Grzinic, Marina/Tatlic, Sefik (2014): Necropolitics, Racialization, and Global Capi-
talism. Historicization of Biopolitics and Forensics of Politics, Art, and Life, Lanham