Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communication and Media Ethics

Ed. by Lee Plaisance, Patrick

Series:Handbooks of Communication Science [HoCS] 26

eBook (PDF)
Publication Date:
September 2018
Copyright year:
See all formats and pricing

15. Harm in Public Relations

Fawkes, Johanna


This chapter summarises the main positions of public relations ethics, characterising the field as profoundly divided between the organisation-centred functionalist approach of the ‘Excellence’ project and the more societally-aware rhetorical/ critical schools of writing. The former delineates best practice but has been interpreted as descriptive rather than normative; as if best practice tells the whole story. Unlike Excellence, rhetorical schools embrace advocacy and accept persuasion. Growing numbers of critical and cultural scholars have changed the focus from organisation to society. These positions are explored, particularly regarding their ethical stances and attitudes to a central problem for public relations: the role of persuasion in practice. This is symptomatic of a deeper problem: conflicted loyalties to employer - who pays the wages or fees - and society - which bestows the title of profession only on those who can be seen to contribute beyond an employment contract. Exploration of these problems leads inexorably to contemplation of the potential for harm in the practice and theory of public relations.

Citation Information

Johanna Fawkes (2018). 15. Harm in Public Relations. In Patrick Lee Plaisance (Editor), Communication and Media Ethics (pp. 273–294). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110466034-015

Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110466034

Online ISBN: 9783110466034

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/BostonGet Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in