Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

New Perspectives on Distributive Justice

Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus

Ed. by Knoll, Manuel / Snyder, Stephen / Şimsek, Nurdane

eBook (PDF)
Publication Date:
November 2018
Copyright year:
2019
ISBN
978-3-11-053736-9
See all formats and pricing

Responsibility and Justice: Beyond Moral Egalitarianism and Rational Consensus

Dimitrova, Maria

Abstract

John Rawls stakes the possibility of justice on the autonomy, tolerance and self-reflection of each participant in a deliberative process. The deliberation on the idea of justice behind the veil of ignorance implies a sense of indifference to the otherness of others and their life projects. However, objectivity of justice requires first and foremost a response to others’ needs, protection of others’ rights as well as engagement with them. The institutions are created and dedicated to this purpose instead of being committed to the fulfillment of the idea of justice as fairness. The very search for justice, without which justice is impossible, is inspired by responsibility. But responsibility and justice are unlikely to be a matter of rational consensus and moral egalitarianism.

Citation Information

Maria Dimitrova (2018). Responsibility and Justice: Beyond Moral Egalitarianism and Rational Consensus. In Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder, Nurdane Şimsek (Eds.), New Perspectives on Distributive Justice: Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus (pp. 441–448). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369-027

Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110537369

Online ISBN: 9783110537369

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/BostonGet Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in