Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

American, British and Canadian Studies Journal

The Journal of Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1841-964X
See all formats and pricing




“That Show You Like Might Be Coming Back in Style”: How Twin Peaks Changed the Face of Contemporary Television

Raluca Moldovan
  • Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca
Published Online: 2015-08-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsj-2015-0003

Abstract

The present study revisits one of American television’s most famous and influential shows, Twin Peaks, which ran on ABC between 1990 and 1991. Its unique visual style, its haunting music, the idiosyncratic characters and the mix of mythical and supernatural elements made it the most talked-about TV series of the 1990s and generated numerous parodies and imitations. Twin Peaks was the brainchild of America’s probably least mainstream director, David Lynch, and Mark Frost, who was known to television audiences as one of the scriptwriters of the highly popular detective series Hill Street Blues. When Twin Peaks ended in 1991, the show’s severely diminished audience were left with one of most puzzling cliffhangers ever seen on television, but the announcement made by Lynch and Frost in October 2014, that the show would return with nine fresh episodes premiering on Showtime in 2016, quickly went viral and revived interest in Twin Peaks’ distinctive world. In what follows, I intend to discuss the reasons why Twin Peaks was considered a highly original work, well ahead of its time, and how much the show was indebted to the legacy of classic American film noir; finally, I advance a few speculations about the possible plotlines the series might explore upon its return to the small screen.

Keywords: Twin Peaks; television series; film noir; David Lynch

Works Cited

  • Arp, Robert; Patricia Brace. “’The Owls Are Not What They Seem’: The Logic of Lynch’s World.” The Philosophy of David Lynch. Ed. by William J. Devlin, Shai Biderman. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2011. 7-24. Print.

  • Blake, Meredith. “Q&A: ‘Twin Peaks’ Co-Creator Mark Frost on Showtime Reboot, Cliffhangers.” Los Angeles Times, October 6, 2014. Web.

  • Brown, Royal S. Overtones and Undertones: Reading Film Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994. Print.

  • Burns, Andy. Wrapped in Plastic: Twin Peaks. Toronto: ECW Press, 2015. Print.

  • Chion, Michel. David Lynch. 2nd ed. London: British Film Institute, 2008. Print.

  • Crouch, Ian. “Some Thoughts on the Planned Return of ‘Twin Peaks’.” The New Yorker, October 7, 2014. Web.

  • Devlin, William J. and Shai Biderman. “Introduction.” The Philosophy of David Lynch. Ed. by William J. Devlin, Shai Biderman. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2011. 1-6. Print.

  • Dolan, Mark. “The Peaks and Valleys of Serial Creativity: What Happened to/on Twin Peaks.” Full of Secrets. Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. by David Lavery. Detroit: Wayne U.P., 1995. 30-50. Print.

  • Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Nature.” Ralph Waldo Emerson: Essays & Lectures. Ed. by Joel Porte. New York: Literary Classics of the United States, 1983. 48-50. Print.

  • Gherasim, Gabriel C. “După chipul si asemănarea Americii: lumea jazz-ului în tezele lui Ken Burns.” Interferențe Euro-Atlantice. 20 de ani de studii europene la Universitatea Babes-Bolyai. Ed. by Liviu C. Tîrău, Stefan Melancu. Cluj-Napoca: EFES, 2013. 457-467. Print.

  • Holt, Jason. “Twin Peaks, Noir, and Open Interpretation.” The Philosophy of TV Noir. Ed. by Steven M. Sanders, Aeon J. Skoble. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2008. 247-260. Print.

  • Howe, Andrew. “The Owls Are Not What They Seem. Cultural Artifacts of Twin Peaks.” Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks. Ed. by Marisa C. Hayes, Franck Boulegue. Chicago: Intellect Books, 2013. 109-137. Print.

  • Hughes, David. The Complete Lynch. London: Ebury Publishing, 2001. Print.

  • Kalinak, Kathryn. “’Disturbing the Guests with This Racket’: Music and Twin Peaks.” Full of Secrets. Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. by David Lavery. Detroit: Wayne U.P., 1995. 82-92. Print.

  • Keily-Pheasant, Fran. “Strange Spaces. Cult Topographies in Twin Peaks.” Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks. Ed. by Marisa C. Hayes, Franck Boulegue. Chicago: Intellect Books, 2013. 254-289. Print.

  • Lynch, David. Catching the Big Fish: Meditation, Consciousness, and Creativity. New York: Penguin, 2007. Print.

  • Mactaggart, Allister. The Film Paintings of David Lynch. Challenging Film Theory. Bristol: Intellect Books, 2010. Print.

  • Manning, Russell. “The Thing about David Lynch: Enjoying the Lynchian World.” The Philosophy of David Lynch. Ed. by William J. Devlin, Shai Biderman. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2011. 61-76. Print.

  • Martin, Richard. The Architecture of David Lynch. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. Print.

  • McGowan, Todd. The Impossible David Lynch. New York: Columbia U.P., 2007. Print.

  • Mejia, Paula. “Like His Films, David Lynch’s The Big Dream Is Enigmatic and Opaque” (Review). Time Magazine, July 19, 2013. Web.

  • Murray, Chris. “Gothic Daemon BOB.” Fan Phenomena: Twin Peaks. Ed. by Marisa C. Hayes, Franck Boulegue. Chicago: Intellect Books, 2013. 290-316. Print.

  • Newman, Kim. “David Lynch.” International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. Directors. 4th ed. Ed. by Tom Pendergast, Sara Pendergast. New York: St. James Press, 2000. Print.

  • Nieland, Justus. David Lynch. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2012. Print.

  • Nochimson, Martha P. David Lynch’s Passion: Wild at Heart in Hollywood. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997. Print.

  • Odell, Colin and Michelle LeBlanc. David Lynch. Harpenden: Oldcastle Books, 2007. Print.

  • Olson, Greg. David Lynch: Beautiful Dark. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, 2008. Print.

  • Poniewozik, James. “Go Ahead, Get Excited for the New Twin Peaks. Even If It Turns Out Awful.” Time Magazine, October 6, 2014. Web.

  • Richardson, John. “Laura and Twin Peaks: Postmodern Parody and the Musical Reconstruction of the Absent Femme Fatale.” The Cinema of David Lynch: American Dreams, Nightmare Visions. Ed. by Erica Sheen, Annette Davison. London: Wallflower Press, 2004. 77-92. Print.

  • Riches, Simon. “Intuition and Investigation into Another Place: The Epistemological Role of Dreaming in Twin Peaks and Beyond.” The Philosophy of David Lynch. Ed. by William J. Devlin, Shai Biderman. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2011. 25-44. Print.

  • Rosenbaum, Jonathan. “Bad Ideas: The Art and Politics of Twin Peaks.” Full of Secrets. Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. by David Lavery. Detroit: Wayne U.P., 1995. 22-29. Print.

  • Rothman, Lily. “There’s One Big Difference between the Original Twin Peaks and the Reboot.” Time Magazine, October 6, 2014. Web.

  • Sanders, Steven M. “An Introduction to the Philosophy of TV Noir.” The Philosophy of TV Noir. Ed. by Steven M. Sanders, Aeon J. Skoble. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2008. 1-32. Print.

  • Sheen, Erica; Annette Davidson. “Introduction: American Dreams, Nightmare Visions.” The Cinema of David Lynch. American Dreams, Nightmare Visions. Ed. by Erica Sheen, Annette Davison. London: Wallflower Press, 2004. 1-4. Print.

  • Suter, Scott Hamilton. “‘There’s a Sort of Evil Out There’: Emersonian Transcendentalism in Twin Peaks.” The Philosophy of David Lynch. Ed. by William J. Devlin, Shai Biderman. Lexington: The U.P. of Kentucky, 2011. 175-188. Print.

  • Todd, Antony. Authorship and the Films of David Lynch: Aesthetic Receptions in Contemporary Hollywood. London: I.B. Tauris, 2012. Print.

  • Zoglin, Richard. “Like Nothing on Earth.” Time Magazine, April 9, 1990. Web.


Published Online: 2015-08-21

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: American, British and Canadian Studies Journal. Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 44–68, ISSN (Online) 1841-964X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsj-2015-0003, August 2015

© ABC Studies, Journal of the Academic Anglophone Society of Romania. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.