Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archives of Civil Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.251
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.521

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1230-2945
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 58, Issue 2

Numerical Implementation of Meshless Methods for Beam Problems

V. E. Rosca
  • Corresponding author
  • Lecturer, ”Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University from Iasi, Faculty Of Civil Engineering and
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ V. M. A. Leitāo
Published Online: 2012-07-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v.10169-012-0010-3

Abstract

For solving a partial different equation by a numerical method, a possible alternative may be either to use a mesh method or a meshless method. A flexible computational procedure for solving 1D linear elastic beam problems is presented that currently uses two forms of approximation function (moving least squares and kernel approximation functions) and two types of formulations, namely the weak form and collocation technique, respectively, to reproduce Element Free Galerkin (EFG) and Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) meshless methods. The numerical implementation for beam problems of these two formulations is discussed and numerical tests are presented to illustrate the difference between the formulations.

Extended abstract

For solving a partial different equation by a numerical method, a possible alternative may be either to use a mesh method or a meshless method. A flexible computational procedure for solving 1D linear elastic beam problems is presented that currently uses two forms of approximation function (moving least squares and kernel approximation functions) and two types of formulations, namely the weak form and collocation technique, respectively. The approximations functions constructed in continuous or in discrete way are used as approximations of the strong forms of partial differential equations (PDEs), and those serving as approximations of the weak forms of PDEs to set up a linear system of equations to reproduce Element Free Galerkin (EFG) and Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) meshless methods. To approximate the strong form of a PDE, the partial differential equation is usually discretized by specific collocation technique. The SPH is a representative method for the strong form collocation approach. To approximate the weak form of a PDE, Galerkin weak formulation is used.

Numerical applications for beam problems are obtained by implementing various quadrature techniques to perform the integrations of the system equations in EFG method or for discretize the continuous form of the displacement of the SPH. Numerical comparison between these two formulations performed in the aim to illustrate the difference between the formulations.

Keywords: numerical methods; meshless formulation; EFG; SPH; beam discretisation

References

  • 1. L.B. Lucy, A numerical approach to the testing of the fission thesis. The Astronomical Journal, 82, 12, 1013-1024, 1977.Google Scholar

  • 2. W.K. Liu, S. Jun, Y.F. Zhang, Reproducing Kernel Particle Methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 20, 1081-1106, 1995.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 3. S. Li, W.K. Liu, Meshfree and particle methods and their applications. Applied Mechanics Review, 55, 1, 1-34, 2002.Google Scholar

  • 4. T. Belytschko, Y. Krongauz, D. Organ, M. Fleming, P. Krysl, Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 139, 3-47, 1996.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5. P.W. Randles, L.D. Libersky, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 139, 375-408, 1996.Google Scholar

  • 6. P. Lancaster, K. Salkauskas, Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods, Mathematics of Computation, 37, 141-158, 1981.Google Scholar

  • 7. T. Belytschko, Y.Y. Lu, L. Gu, Element-Free Galerkin Methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 37, 229-256, 1994.Google Scholar

  • 8. J. Dolbow, T. Belytschko, An Introduction to Programming the Meshless Element Free Galerkin Method, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 5, 3, 207-241, 1998.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. I.M. Sobol, The Monte Carlo Method, University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar

  • 10. J.J. Monaghan, An introduction to SPH. Computer Physics Communications, 48, 89-96, 1988.Google Scholar

  • 11. V.E. Rosca, V.M.A. Leitāo, Quasi-Monte Carlo mesh-free integration for meshless weak formulations. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 32, 6, 471-479, 2008. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2012-03-21

Revised: 2012-06-15

Published Online: 2012-07-19

Published in Print: 2012-06-01


Citation Information: Archives of Civil Engineering, Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 175–184, ISSN (Online) 1230-2945, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v.10169-012-0010-3.

Export Citation

© Polish Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in