Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archives of Civil Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.251
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.521

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1230-2945
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Investigating the Effect of the Number of End-Panel Studs on the Seismic Properties of Cold-Formed Light-Steel Shear-Panel Braces

Mohammad Reza Javaheri Tafti / Farhad Behnamfar
Published Online: 2013-07-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2013-0010

Abstract

Detailed investigation of the effect of the number of end-panel studs on the seismic properties of light-steel shear-panel braces in cold-formed steel frames and in particular the associated response modification coefficients (R) factor, are presented in this paper. A total of 6 full-scale 1200×2400 mm specimens are considered, and the responses investigated under a standard cyclic loading regime. Of particular interest are the specimens’ maximum lateral load capacity and deformation behavior as well as a rational estimation of the seismic response modification factor. The study also looks at the failure modes of the system and investigates the main factors contributing to the ductile response of the tested shear-panel braces in order to suggest improvements so that braces respond plastically with a significant drift and without any risk of brittle failure, such as connection failure or stud buckling.

Keywords: Cold-Formed Steel; Light Steel Frames; Shear-panel bracing; Lateral Performance; Response Modification Factor

References

  • 1. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - prescriptive method for one and two family dwellings 2001, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 2. AISI, North American specification for the sesign of cold-formed steel structural members. 2001, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 3. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - General provisions. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 4. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Header design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 5. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Lateral design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 6. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Wall stud design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 7. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Truss design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 8. AISI, Design of cold-formed steel shear walls. 1998, Steel Framing Alliance.Google Scholar

  • 9. AISI, Performance of cold-formed steel-framed shear walls: Alternative configurations Research report RP 02-7. 2002, REVISION 2006, Steel Framing Alliance: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 10. AISI, Code of standard practice for cold-formed steel structural framing, Practice guide CF06-1. 2006, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 11. ASCE7-05, ASCE 7-05 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. 2005, ASCE: USA.Google Scholar

  • 12. FEMA-450, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures - Part1 Provisions. 2003, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA.Google Scholar

  • 13. FEMA-P750, NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. 2009, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 14. TI809-07, Design of cold-formed loadbearing steel systems and masonry veneer / steel stud walls. 1998, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering and Construction Division: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

  • 15. FEMA-302, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, in FEMA 302. 1998, Building Seismic Safety Council.Google Scholar

  • 16. UBC, Uniform building code. 1997, International Conference of Building Officials: California, USA.Google Scholar

  • 17. IBC, International building code. 2006, International Code Council.Google Scholar

  • 18. AS1170.4, Structural design actions, Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. 2007, Standards Australia.Google Scholar

  • 19. AS/NZS4600, Cold-formed steel structures, AS/NZS 4600. 2005, Australian Building Codes Board.Google Scholar

  • 20. Serrette, R.L. (1997), “Additional Shear Wall Values for Light Weight Steel Framing.” Report No. LGSRG-1-97, Santa Clara University. Santa Clara, CA.Google Scholar

  • 21. Kawai Y, Kanno R, Hanya K. (1997), “Cyclic Shear Resistance of Light-Gauge Steel Framed Walls”, Portland, OR, USA: ASCE, p. 433-7.Google Scholar

  • 22. Berman J.W., Celik O.C., Bruneau M., (2005), “Comparing Hysteretic Behavior of Light-Gauge Steel Plate Shear Walls and Braced Frames”, Engineering Structures, 27:475-85.Google Scholar

  • 23. ATC-24. (1992), “Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures”, USA: Applied Technology Council, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.Google Scholar

  • 24. Schafer B.W., and Hiriyur B. (2002), “Analysis of Sheathed Cold-Formed Steel Wall Studs”, Orlando, FL, United states: University of Missouri-Rolla, p. 501-13.Google Scholar

  • 25. Fulop L.A. and Dubina D. (2004), “Performance of Wall-Stud Cold-Formed Shear Panels under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading - Part I: Experimental Research”, Thin-Walled Structures, 42:321-38.Google Scholar

  • 26. FEMA-450, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures - Part 2 commentary. 2003, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA.Google Scholar

  • 27. Uang, C.-M., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991. 117(1): p. 19-28.Google Scholar

  • 28. FEMA-356, Pre standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 2000, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: USA, Virginia.Google Scholar

  • 29. Uang, C.-M., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991. 117(1): p. 19-28.Google Scholar

  • 30. Park, R., Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1989. 22(3): p. 155-166.Google Scholar

  • 31. Gad, E.F., et al., Earthquake ductility and overstrength in residential structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 1999. 8(4): p. 361-382.Google Scholar

  • 32. Maheri, M.R. and R. Akbari, Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 2003. 25(12): p. 1505-1513.Google Scholar

  • 33. Kim, J. and H. Choi, Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames. Engineering Structures, 2005. 27(2): p. 285-300.Google Scholar

  • 34. Newmark, N. and W. Hall, Earthquake spectra and design. 1982: Earthquake Engineering Research Inst. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

  • 35. Serrette, R. and K. Ogunfunmi, Shear resistance of gypsum-sheathed light-gauge steel stud walls. Journal of structural engineering New York, N.Y., 1996. 122(4): p. 383-389.Google Scholar

  • 36. US Army Corps of Engineers, TI 809-07, Technical Instructions, Design of Cold-Formed Loadbearing Steel Systems and Masonry Veneer / Steel Stud Walls. 1998: Washington, DC 20314-1000.Google Scholar

  • 37. LabVIEW, LabVIEW SignalExpress. 2007, National Instruments Corporation: Austin, Texas. Google Scholar

  • 38. E2126-07, A.-. Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of walls for buildings. 2007: USA. p. 13.Google Scholar

  • 39. Gad, E.F., et al., Lateral performance of cold-formed steel-framed domestic structures. Engineering Structures, 1999. 21(1): p. 83-95.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-03-02

Revised: 2013-06-10

Published Online: 2013-07-06

Published in Print: 2013-06-01


Citation Information: Archives of Civil Engineering, ISSN (Online) 1230-2945, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2013-0010.

Export Citation

© Polish Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in