Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis

The Scientific Journal for Economics and Management

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2336-4297
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Role of Process Owners in Czech Organizations

Martin Hrabal
  • Corresponding author
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Department of Industrial Engineering and Information Systems, 737 920 416, Czechia,
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Lukáš Trčka
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Department of Enterprise Economics, 774 803 904, Czechia,
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ David Tuček
  • Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Department of Industrial Engineering and Information Systems, 733 690 583, Czechia,
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acta-2016-0004

Abstract

Business Process Management is a widely discussed topic both in business practice and academic environment. The research especially focuses on the technical and methodology issues of process management. This paper deals with the process ownership pillar of Business Process Management as a part of wider research topic focused on the role of human factor in the field. Process owners are traditionally assigned to manage and improve business processes. This paper therefore analyses the survey conducted in Czech organizations, both firms and non-profit organizations, using software applications supporting process management with stress put on process owners and their competencies. The goal is to find out the scope of process owners´ competencies and to test whether the association between process ownership pillar and the level of Business Process Management maturity of an organization exists. Fisher exact test was used to calculate possible association. Results do not indicate such clear association based on the research sample.

Keywords: business process management; process owner; competency management; business process management maturity

References

  • Accenture - BPM Governance in Practice. (2013). Retrieved November 12, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259755325_Research_Study_-_BPM_Governance_in_PracticeGoogle Scholar

  • Drucker, P., & Maciariello, J. (2008). Management (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Collins.Google Scholar

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll) (3rd ed.). Los Angeles [i.e. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

  • Franz, P., & Kirchmer, M. (2012). Value-driven: Business process management: The value-switch for lasting competitive advantage. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

  • Hammer, M. (2003). The agenda: What every business must do to dominate the decade. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2003). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperBusiness Essentials.Google Scholar

  • Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (1995). The reengineering revolution: A handbook. New York, N.Y.: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar

  • Harmon, P. (2014). Business process change: A business process management guide for managers and process professionals (Third ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

  • Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (n.d.). Business process management: Practical guidelines to successful implementations (Third ed.). New York: Routledge Google Scholar

  • Kohlbacher, M., & Gruenwald, S. (2011). Process ownership, process performance measurement and firm performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(7), 709-720.Google Scholar

  • Lehmann, C. (2012). Strategy and business process management: Techniques for improving execution, adaptability, and consistency. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

  • Lehrer, T., Edl, M. and Rosi, B. (2013). Energy efficiency model for the mini-load automated storage and retrieval systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70: 97-115, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5253-x.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lehrer, T., Sraml, M., Potrc, I. and Tollazzi, J. (2010). Travel time models for double-deep automated storage and retrieval systems. International Journal of Production Research, 48(11), 3151-3172. DOI: 10.1080/00207540902796008.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nesheim, T. (2011). Balancing process ownership and line management in a matrix-like organization. Knowledge and process management: the journal of corporate transformation, 18(2), 109-119. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.377CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Panagacos, T. (2012). The Ultimate guide to business process management. USA: [Place of publication not identified]. Popesko, B. (2010) Activity-based costing application methodology for manufacturing industries. E+M: Ekonomie a management. 13(1), 103-114.Google Scholar

  • Power, B. (2011). "Where have all the process owners gone", HBR Blog Network, No. January 7. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from https://hbr.org/2011/01/where-have-all-the-process-own.Google Scholar

  • Rajnoha, R., and Chromjaková, F. (2009) Activity based costing and efficiency of its application in the wooden houses production. In: DREWNO-WOOD. Poznaň: Instytut Technologii Drewna, Poland, 52, (181),105 - 127.Google Scholar

  • Robson, M., & Ullah, P. (1996). A practical guide to business process re-engineering. Aldershot, England: Gower.Google Scholar

  • Segatto, M., de Pádua, S. I. D., & Martinelli, D. P. (2013). Business process management: a systemic approach? Business Process Management Journal, 19(4), 698-714. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-Jun-2012-0064.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siemieniuch, C. E. & Sinclair, M. A. (2002). On complexity, process ownership and organisational learning in manufacturing organisations, from an ergonomics perspective. Applied Ergonomics, 33(5), 449-462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2007). Business process management: The third wave (4th Anniversary ed). Tampa, Fla.: Meghan-Kiffer Press.Google Scholar

  • Trebuňa, P., Fiľo, M., and Pekarčíková, M. (2013). Supply and distribution logistics 1.ed., Ostrava: Amos.Google Scholar

  • Tuček, D., Hájková, M. & Tučková, Z. (2013). Utilization Level of Business Process Management in Czech Enterprises - Objectives and Factors. E + M Economics a Management. 2013. 16(2), 81-98.Google Scholar

  • Tuckova, Z. (2012) Importance of Knowledge Services in the Czech Republic and Germany: A Case Study In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Knowledge Management. Spain: 1202-1210.Google Scholar

  • Tuckova, Z, Fialova, S., and Strouhal, J. (2012) Health Care Systems: Comparative Analysis from Czech Perspective, International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 6(2), 297-304.Google Scholar

  • Zamecnik, R. (2014). The measurement of employee motivation by using multi-factor statistical analysis In: 2nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management (BEM). Antalya: SciencePark Res, Org & Counseling Ltd; Acad World Educ & Res Ctr; Hacettepe University, Turkey, Vol. 109, 851-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-11-23

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, ISSN (Online) 2336-4297, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acta-2016-0004.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in