Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Veterinaria

The Journal of University of Belgrade

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.388
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.605

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Relationships among pre-slaughter stress, rigor mortis, blood lactate, and meat and carcass quality in pigs

Marija Dokmanović / Milan Baltić Ž. / Radmila Marković / Marija Bošković / Jasna Lončina / Nataša Glamočlija / Mirjana Đorđević
Published Online: 2014-03-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2014-0013


The aim of this study was to examine the relationships among pre-slaughter stress, rigor mortis, blood lactate, and meat and carcass quality in 100 pigs (cross between Naima sows and hybrids P-76 PenArLan boars). Before slaughter lairage time, handling and pig behavior were assessed for each animal. At exsanguination blood concentrations of lactate and cortisol were determined, while post-mortem were assessed: initial and ultimate pH value, temperature, drip, sensory and instrumental colour and marbling. On the carcasses the degree of rigor mortis and skin damage score were estimated, as well as carcass quality parameters. More developed (p<0.01) rigor mortis was observed after long lairage compared to short lairage. Higher intensity of rigor was found in pigs with higher blood lactate level (p<0.05) and with a greater thickness of subcutaneous fat tissue (p<0.05) and lower lean meat content (p<0.01). Higher blood lactate level was observed after long lairage compared to short (p<0.05) and after rough handling compared to gentle handling (p<0.01). In the group with blood lactate from 10 to 15 mmol/l meat temperature and skin blemishes score increased, while in the group with the highest blood lactate concentration (>15 mmol/l) initial pH decreased and L* value increased. These results suggest that in groups with higher blood lactate concentrations meat quality deteriorates.

Keywords: pigs; pre-slaughter stress; rigor mortis; blood lactate; carcass and meat quality


  • 1. Lawrie RA, Ledward DA: Lawrie’s Meat Science, Seventh Edition, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge, England; 2006.Google Scholar

  • 2. Aberle ED, Forrest JC, Gerrard DE, Mille EW, Hedrick HB, Judge MD, Merkel RA: Principles of meat science. Dubuque, IA, USA: Kendall/Hunt Co; 2001.Google Scholar

  • 3. Gregory NG: Physiology of stress, distress, stunning and slaughter. In: Animal welfare and meat quality. Willingford, UK, CAB International; 1998, 64-92.Google Scholar

  • 4. Warriss PD, Brown SN, Knowles TG: Measurements of the degree of development of rigor mortis as an indicator of stress in slaughtered pigs. Vet Rec 2003, 153: 739-742.Google Scholar

  • 5. Knowles T, Warriss PD: Stress physiology during transport. In: Livestock Handling and Transport. Grandin T, CAB International, Wallingford, UK; 2007, 312-328.Google Scholar

  • 6. Warriss PD, Brown SN, Adams SJM, Corlett IK: Relationships between subjective and objective assessments of stress at slaughter and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci 1994, 38: 329-340.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Hambrecht E, Eissen J, Nooijen IJ, Ducro BJ, Smits CHM, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MW: Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plant. J Anim Sci 2004, 82: 1401-1409.Google Scholar

  • 8. Hambrecht EJ, Eissen J, Newman DJ, Smits CHM, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MWA: Negative effects of stress immediately before slaughter on pork quality are aggravated by suboptimal transport and lairage conditions. J Anim Sci 2005, 83: 440-448.Google Scholar

  • 9. Davis CE, Townsend WE, McCampbell HC: Early rigor detection in pork carcasses by foreleg position. J Anim Sci 1978, 46: 376-383.Google Scholar

  • 10. Honikel KO: Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 1998, 49: 447-457.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11. CIE, 1976, International Commission on Illumination, Colorimetry: Offi cial Recommendation of the International Commission on IlluminationPublication CIE No. (E-1.31), Paris, France: Bureau Central de la CIE.Google Scholar

  • 12. NPPC (National Pork Producers Council): Pork composition and quality assessment procedures. E. Berg (Ed.), National Pork Producers Council, Des Monica, Iowa, USA; 2000, 1-38.Google Scholar

  • 13. Kauffman RG, Cassens RG, Scherer A, Meeker DL: Variations in pork quality. National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA, 1992.Google Scholar

  • 14. Serbian regulation 1985. Pravilnik o kvalitetu zaklanih svinja i kategorizaciji svinjskog mesa [Rules on quality of slaughtered pigs and categorization of pig meat]. Službeni list SFRJ, broj 2 [Offi cial Gazette of the SFRY, No 2].Google Scholar

  • 15. Savell JW, Mueller SL, Baird BE: The chilling of carcasses. Meat Sci 2005, 70: 449-459.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Taylor AA, Dant SJ: Infl uence of carcass cooling rate on drip loss in pigment. J Food Technol 1971, 6: 131-139.Google Scholar

  • 17. Swatland HJ: Development of rigor mortis in intact sides of pork measured with a portable rigorometer. J Anim Sci 1985, 614: 882-826.Google Scholar

  • 18. Dransfi eld E, Lockyer DK: Cold shortening toughness in excised pork. Meat Sci 1985, 5: 13-19.Google Scholar

  • 19. Bruijnzeel AW, Stam R, Compaan JC, Wiegant VM: Stress-induced sensitization of CRH-ir but not P-CREB-ir responsivity in the rat central nerous system. Brain Res 2001, 908: 187-196.Google Scholar

  • 20. Stam R, Bruijnzeel AW, Wiegant V: Long-lasting stress sensitisation. Eur J Pharmacol 2000, 405: 217-224.Google Scholar

  • 21. Stam R, van Laar TJ, Akkermans LM, Wiegant VM: Variability factors in the expression of stress-induced behavioural sensitisation. Behav Brain Res 2002, 132: 69-76.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 22. Huff Lonergan E, Zhang W, Lonergan SM: Biochemistry of post-mortem muscle - Lessons on mechanisms of meat tenderization. Meat Sci 2010, 86: 184-195.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 23. Warriss PD: Meat Science: An Introductory Text, 2nd edition, Cabi Publishing, Cambridge; 2010.Google Scholar

  • 24. Shiang Liang C, Kang Chih C, Kou Joong L: The relationships between different degrees of rigor state carcasses and four meat quality and their stability during storage time. Taiwan J Agric Food Chem 2009, 47: 64-70.Google Scholar

  • 25. Tornberg E: Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness. Meat Sci 1996, 43: 175-191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26. Edwards LN, Grandin T, Engle TE, Ritter MJ, Sosnicki AA, Carlson BA, Anderson DB: The effects of pre-slaughter pig management from the farm to the processing plant on pork quality, Meat Sci 2010, 86: 938-944.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 27. Edwards LM, Engle TE Correa JA, Paradis MA, Grandin T, Anderson DB: The relationship between exsanguination blood lactate concentration and carcass quality in slaughter. Meat Sci 2010, 85: 435-440.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 28. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Hofmeyr C, Coleman GJ, Dowling S, Boyce J: The effects of fear of humans and preslaughter handling on the meat quality of pigs. Aust J Agric Res 2002, 53: 493-501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29. Kraft W: Behavior of various plasma enzymes and electrolytes as well as of glucose, nonesterifi ed fatty acids and lactate in pigs during the stabling following transport to the abattoir. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1973, 20: 357-369.Google Scholar

  • 30. Salajpal K, Dikic M, Karolyi D, Sinjeri Z, Liker B, Kostelic A, Juric I: Blood serum metabolites and meat quality in crossbred pigs experiencing different lairage time. Ital J Anim Sci 2005, 4: 119-121.Google Scholar

  • 31. Dalla Costa OA, Ludke JV, Coldebella A, Kich JD, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Faucitano L, Peloso JV, Dalla Roza D: Effect of pre-slaughter management on physiological parameters of heavy-weight female pigs. Ciênc Rural 2009, 39: 852-858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32. Edwards LN, Grandin T, Engle TE Porter SP, Ritter MJ, Sosnicki AA, Anderson DB: Use of exsanguination blood lactate to assess the quality of pre-slaughter pig handling. Meat Sci 2010, 86: 384-390.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 33. Perez MP, Palacio J, Santolaria MP, Del Aceña MC, Chacón G, Verde MT, Calvo JH, Zaragoza MP, Gascón M, García-Belenguer S: Infl uence of lairage time on some welfare and meat quality parameters in pigs. Vet Res 2002, 33: 239-250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34. Benjamin ME, Gonyou HW, Ivers DJ, Richcardson LF, Jones DJ, Wagner JR, Seneriz R, Anderson DB: Effects of animal handling method on the incidence of stress responses in market swine in a model system [abstract]. J Anim Sci 2001, 79: 1.Google Scholar

  • 35. Ivers DJ, Richardson LF, Jones DJ, Watkins LE, Miller KD, Wagner JR, Seneriz R, Zimmermann AG, Bowers KA, Anderson DB: Physiological comparison of downer and nondowner pigs following transportation and unloading at a packing plant [abstract]. J Anim Sci 2002, 80: 10.Google Scholar

  • 36. Fernandez X, Meunier-Salaün MC, Ecolan P, Morméde P: Interactive effect of food deprivation and agonistic behavior on blood parameters and muscle glycogen in pigs. Physiol Behav 1994, 58: 337-345.Google Scholar

  • 37. Stoier S, Aaslyng MD, Olsen EV, Henckel P: The effect of stress during lairage and stunning on muscle metabolism and drip loss in Danish pork. Meat Sci 2001, 59: 127-131.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 38. Rabaste C, Faucitano L, Saucier L, Mormède P, Correa JA, Giguère A, Bergeron R: The effects of handling and group size on welfare of pigs in lairage and their infl uence on stomach weight, carcass microbial contamination and meat quality. Can J Anim Sci 2007, 87: 3-12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 39. Lambooij E: Transport Of Pigs. In: Livestock Handling and Transport. Grandin T, CABI Publishing, New York, NY; 2000, 275-296.Google Scholar

  • 40. Swatland HJ: Progress in understanding the paleness of meat with a low pH. S Afr J Anim Sci 2004, 34: 1-7.Google Scholar

  • 41. Adzitey F, Nurul H: Pale Soft Exudative (PSE) and Dark Firm Dry (DFD) Meats: Causes and measures to reduce these incidences. Int Food Res J 2011, 18: 11-20. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-03-25

Published in Print: 2014-03-01

Citation Information: Acta Veterinaria, Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 124–137, ISSN (Online) 1820-7448, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2014-0013.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Markus Böl, Kay Leichsenring, Michael Ernst, and Alexander E. Ehret
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2016, Volume 63, Page 115

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in