Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium

Ed. by Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. / Biondi, Yuri / Sunder, Shyam

See all formats and pricing
More options …

New Thinking on "Shareholder Primacy"

Lynn A. Stout
Published Online: 2012-06-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/2152-2820.1037

By the beginning of the twenty-first century, many observers had come to believe that U.S. corporate law should, and does, embrace a “shareholder primacy” rule that requires corporate directors to maximize shareholder wealth as measured by share price. This Essay argues that such a view is mistaken.As a positive matter, U.S. corporate law and practice does not require directors to maximize “shareholder value” but instead grants them a wide range of discretion, constrained only at the margin by market forces, to sacrifice shareholder wealth in order to benefit other constituencies and the firm itself. Although recent “reforms” designed to promote greater shareholder power have begun to limit this discretion, U.S. corporate governance remains director-centric.As a normative matter, several lines of theory have emerged in modern corporate scholarship that independently explain why director governance of public firms is desirable from shareholders’ own perspective. These theories suggest that if we want to protect the interests of shareholders as a class over time—rather than the interest of a single shareholder in today’s stock price—conventional shareholder primacy thinking is counterproductive. The Essay reviews five of these lines of theory and explores why each gives us reason to believe that shareholder primacy rules in public companies in fact disadvantage shareholders. It concludes that shareholder primacy thinking in its conventional form is on the brink of intellectual collapse, and will be replaced by more sophisticated and nuanced theories of corporate structure and purpose.

Keywords: corporate governance; shareholder value; agency theory; entity theory; financialisation; corporate law and economics; theory of the firm

About the article

Published Online: 2012-06-08

Citation Information: Accounting, Economics, and Law, Volume 2, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 2152-2820, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/2152-2820.1037.

Export Citation

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Yuri Biondi and Imke Graeff
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2016
Huasheng Gao, Kai Li, and Yujing Ma
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2016
Bala N. Balasubramanian and R. V. Anand
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
Yuri Biondi and Imke Graeff
Accounting Forum, 2017, Volume 41, Number 4, Page 318
Thomas Clarke
Society and Business Review, 2015, Volume 10, Number 3, Page 306

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in