Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analysis and Geometry in Metric Spaces

Ed. by Ritoré, Manuel

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.110
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.026

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2016: 0.78


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2299-3274
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Combinatorial Modulus on Boundary of Right-Angled Hyperbolic Buildings

Antoine Clais
Published Online: 2016-02-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agms-2016-0001

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the quasiconformal structure of boundaries of right-angled hyperbolic buildings using combinatorial tools. In particular, we exhibit some examples of buildings of dimension 3 and 4 whose boundaries satisfy the combinatorial Loewner property. This property is a weak version of the Loewner property. This is motivated by the fact that the quasiconformal structure of the boundary led to many results of rigidity in hyperbolic spaces since G.D.Mostow. In the case of buildings of dimension 2, many work have been done by M. Bourdon and H. Pajot. In particular, the Loewner property on the boundary permitted them to prove the quasi-isometry rigidity of right-angled Fuchsian buildings.

Keywords: Boundary of hyperbolic space; building; combinatorial modulus; combinatorial Loewner property; quasi-conformal analysis

References

  • [1] Peter Abramenko and Kenneth S. Brown. Buildings, volume 248 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2008. Theory and applications. Google Scholar

  • [2] Mario Bonk and Bruce Kleiner. Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensional metric spheres. Invent. Math., 150(1):127–183, 2002. Google Scholar

  • [3] Mario Bonk and Bruce Kleiner. Conformal dimension and Gromov hyperbolic groups with 2-sphere boundary. Geom. Topol., 9:219–246, 2005. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Marc Bourdon and Bruce Kleiner. Combinatorial modulus, the combinatorial Loewner property, and Coxeter groups. Groups Geom. Dyn., 7(1):39–107, 2013. Google Scholar

  • [5] M. Bourdon. Immeubles hyperboliques, dimension conforme et rigidité de Mostow. Geom. Funct. Anal., 7(2):245–268, 1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Brian H. Bowditch. Cut points and canonical splittings of hyperbolic groups. Acta Math., 180(2):145–186, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [7] Marc Bourdon and Hervé Pajot. Poincaré inequalities and quasiconformal structure on the boundary of some hyperbolic buildings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 127(8):2315–2324, 1999. Google Scholar

  • [8] Marc Bourdon and Hervé Pajot. Rigidity of quasi-isometries for some hyperbolic buildings. Comment. Math. Helv., 75(4):701–736, 2000. Google Scholar

  • [9] James W. Cannon. The combinatorial Riemann mapping theorem. Acta Math., 173(2):155–234, 1994. Google Scholar

  • [10] Pierre-Emmanuel Caprace. Automorphism groups of right-angled buildings: simplicity and local splittings. Fund. Math., 224(1):17–51, 2014. Google Scholar

  • [11] Matias Carrasco. Thése de doctorat : Jauge conforme des espaces métrique compacts. Université de Provence, 2011. Google Scholar

  • [12] M. Coornaert, T. Delzant, and A. Papadopoulos. Géométrie et théorie des groupes, volume 1441 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990. Les groupes hyperboliques de Gromov. [Gromov hyperbolic groups],With an English summary. Google Scholar

  • [13] Ruth Charney. An introduction to right-angled Artin groups. Geom. Dedicata, 125:141–158, 2007. Google Scholar

  • [14] A. Clais. Parallel residues in buildings admitting a group action. Pre-print arXiv:1312.5541, 2013. Google Scholar

  • [15] H. S. M. Coxeter. Regular polytopes. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, third edition, 1973. Google Scholar

  • [16] J. W. Cannon and E. L. Swenson. Recognizing constant curvature discrete groups in dimension 3. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 350(2):809–849, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [17] Michael W. Davis. A hyperbolic 4-manifold. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 93(2):325–328, 1985. Google Scholar

  • [18] MichaelW. Davis. Buildings are CAT(0). In Geometry and cohomology in group theory (Durham, 1994), volume252 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 108–123. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [19] Michael W. Davis. The geometry and topology of Coxeter groups, volume 32 of London Mathematical Society Monographs Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008. Google Scholar

  • [20] MichaelW. Davis and John Meier. The topology at infinity of Coxeter groups and buildings. Comment.Math. Helv., 77(4):746– 766, 2002. Google Scholar

  • [21] Jan Dymara and Damian Osajda. Boundaries of right-angled hyperbolic buildings. Fund. Math., 197:123–165, 2007. Google Scholar

  • [22] Étienne Ghys and Pierre de la Harpe. Espaces métriques hyperboliques. In Sur les groupes hyperboliques d’après Mikhael Gromov (Bern, 1988), volume 83 of Progr. Math., pages 27–45. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990. Google Scholar

  • [23] Damien Gaboriau and Frédéric Paulin. Sur les immeubles hyperboliques. Geom. Dedicata, 88(1-3):153–197, 2001. Google Scholar

  • [24] Peter Haïssinsky. Empilements de cercles et modules combinatoires. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 59(6):2175–2222, 2009. Google Scholar

  • [25] Peter Haïssinsky. Géométrie quasiconforme, analyse au bord des espaces métriques hyperboliques et rigidités [d’après Mostow, Pansu, Bourdon, Pajot, Bonk, Kleiner. . .]. Astérisque, (326):Exp. No. 993, ix, 321–362 (2010), 2009. Séminaire Bourbaki. Vol. 2007/2008. Google Scholar

  • [26] Juha Heinonen. Lectures on analysis on metric spaces. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. Google Scholar

  • [27] Juha Heinonen and Pekka Koskela. Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry. Acta Math., 181(1):1– 61, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [28] Frédéric Haglund and Frédéric Paulin. Constructions arborescentes d’immeubles. Math. Ann., 325(1):137–164, 2003. Google Scholar

  • [29] Ilya Kapovich and Nadia Benakli. Boundaries of hyperbolic groups. In Combinatorial and geometric group theory (New York, 2000/Hoboken, NJ, 2001), volume 296 of Contemp. Math., pages 39–93. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002. Google Scholar

  • [30] Stephen Keith and Bruce Kleiner. In preparation. Google Scholar

  • [31] S. Keith and T. Laakso. Conformal Assouad dimension and modulus. Geom. Funct. Anal., 14(6):1278–1321, 2004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Bruce Kleiner. The asymptotic geometry of negatively curved spaces: uniformization, geometrization and rigidity. In International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. II, pages 743–768. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [33] Charles Loewner. On the conformal capacity in space. J. Math. Mech., 8:411–414, 1959. Google Scholar

  • [34] John Meier. When is the graph product of hyperbolic groups hyperbolic? Geom. Dedicata, 61(1):29–41, 1996. Google Scholar

  • [35] John M.Mackay and Jeremy T. Tyson. Conformal dimension, volume 54 of University Lecture Series. AmericanMathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. Theory and application. Google Scholar

  • [36] James R. Munkres. Topology: a first course. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1975. Google Scholar

  • [37] Pierre Pansu. Dimension conforme et sphère à l’infini des variétés à courbure négative. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A IMath., 14(2):177–212, 1989. Google Scholar

  • [38] Mark Ronan. Lectures on buildings, volume 7 of Perspectives in Mathematics. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1989. Google Scholar

  • [39] Dennis Sullivan. Discrete conformal groups and measurable dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 6(1):57–73, 1982. Google Scholar

  • [40] Jacques Tits. Buildings of spherical type and finite BN-pairs. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 386. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1974. Google Scholar

  • [41] Jeremy Tyson. Quasiconformality and quasisymmetry in metricmeasure spaces. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn.Math., 23(2):525–548, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [42] Jussi Väisälä. Lectures on n-dimensional quasiconformal mappings. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 229. Springer- Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971. Google Scholar

  • [43] Jussi Väisälä. Quasi-Möbius maps. J. Analyse Math., 44:218–234, 1984/85. Google Scholar

  • [44] Matti Vuorinen. Conformal geometry and quasiregular mappings, volume 1319 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1988. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-03-31

Accepted: 2016-01-16

Published Online: 2016-02-11


Citation Information: Analysis and Geometry in Metric Spaces, Volume 4, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2299-3274, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agms-2016-0001.

Export Citation

© 2016 Antoine Clais. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in