Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Geologica Polonica

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.917
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.418

CiteScore 2016: 1.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.507
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.755

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-1887
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Taxonomy and taphonomy of Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) nautilids from Annopol, Poland

Marcin Machalski / Markus Wilmsen
  • Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Mineralogie und Geologie, Sektion Paläozoologie, Konigsbrücker Landstr. 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agp-2015-0021

Abstract

A nautilid faunule of seven specimens, comprising Eutrephoceras bouchardianum (d’Orbigny, 1840), Cymatoceras deslongchampsianum (d’Orbigny, 1840), and Cymatoceras tourtiae (Schlüter, 1876) is described from a condensed middle Cenomanian interval at Annopol, Poland. C. tourtiae is recorded for the first time in Poland. The studied material consists of reworked phosphatised internal moulds of phragmocones, which may be of early or middle Cenomanian age, given the stratigraphic range of the associated ammonites. The nautilid moulds vary in inferred mode of infilling, and in intensity of abrasion, bioerosion and mineralisation. The sediment entered the phragmocones in two ways: 1) through punctures in the shell, the result of bioerosion or mechanical damage; 2) through siphonal openings by intracameral currents. In contrast to the fossil moulds from the Albian phosphorites of Annopol, which originated via direct precipitation of apatite around and/or inside fossils, the present nautilid moulds seem to have originated through secondary phosphatisation of the initially calcareous moulds. Diversity of taphonomic signatures in nautilid material from the middle Cenomanian interval at Annopol is compatible with the complex, multievent depositional scenario proposed for this level.

Keywords: Nautilids; Condensed deposits; Taphonomy; Cenomanian; Cretaceous; Annopol; Poland

References

  • Agassiz, L. 1847. An introduction to the study of natural history, in a series of lectures delivered in the hall of the College of Physicians and Surgeons. 58 pp., Greeley & Mc- Grath, New York.Google Scholar

  • Blainville, H.M.D. de 1825-27. Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie. 664pp. Paris and Strasbourg (Levrault).Google Scholar

  • Bardet, N., Fischer, V. and Machalski, M. 2015. Large predatory marine reptiles from the Albian-Cenomanian of Annopol, Poland. Geological Magazine, http://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756815000254 [in press] CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cichowolski, M. 2003. The nautiloid genus Cymatoceras from the Cretaceous of the Neuquén and Austral basins, Argentina. Cretaceous Research, 24, 375-390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cieśliński, S. 1959. The Albian and Cenomanian in the northern periphery of the Święty Krzyż Mountains. Prace Instytutu Geologicznego, 28, 1-95. [In Polish, with English summary] Google Scholar

  • Dzik, J. 1984. Phylogeny of the Nautiloidea. Palaeontologia Polonica, 45, 1-220.Google Scholar

  • Ernst, G., Schmid, F. and Seibertz, E. 1983. Event-Stratigraphie im Cenoman und Turon von NW-Deutschland. Zitteliana , 10, 531-554.Google Scholar

  • Foord, A.H. 1891. Catalogue of the fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History). Part 2. Containing the remainder of the suborder Nautiloidea, consisting of the families Lituitidae, Trochoceratidae, and Nautilidae, with a supplement. Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 407 pp.Google Scholar

  • Forbes, E. 1845. Report on the fossil Invertebrata from Southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London, Series 2, 7, 97-174.Google Scholar

  • Fraaije, R.H.B., Van Bakel, B., Jagt, J.W.M. and Machalski, M. 2015. A new hermit crab from the upper Albian (Cretaceous) of Annopol. Zootaxa, 3955 (4), 588-594.Google Scholar

  • Frank, J. 2010. Taxonomy and palaeoecology of Cretaceous nautilids Angulithes galea (Fritsch in Fritsch and Schlönbach, 1872) and Angulithes westphalicus (Schlüter, 1872). Bulletin of Geosciences, 85, 487-496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frank, J., Wilmsen, M. and Košťák, M. 2013. The endemic and morphologically remarkable nautilid genus Deltocymatoceras Kummel, 1956 from the Late Cretaceous of central Europe. Bulletin of Geosciences, 88, 793-812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fricot, C. 2010. Le nautile Cymatoceras pseudoelegans (d’Orbigny, 1840) dans l’Albien stratotypique. In: Colleté, C. (coord.), Stratotype Albien. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, Biotope, Meze, 197-199; BRGM (Orléans).Google Scholar

  • Hancock, J.M. 1990. Sea-level-changes in the British region during the Late Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 100 (for 1989), 565-594.Google Scholar

  • Hancock, J. 2004. The mid-Cenomanian eustatic low. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54, 611-627.Google Scholar

  • Henderson, R.A. and McNamara, K.J. 1985. Taphonomy and ichnology of cephalopod shells in a Maastrichtian chalk from Western Australia. Lethaia, 18, 305-322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyatt, A. 1894. Phylogeny of an acquired characteristic. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 32 (for 1893), 349-647.Google Scholar

  • Juignet, P. and Kennedy, W.J. 1976. Faunes d’ammonites et biostratigraphie comparée du Cénomanien du nord-ouest de la France (Normandie) et du sud de l’Angleterre. Bulletin trimestriel de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 63, 1-193.Google Scholar

  • Kapuścińska, A. and Machalski, M. 2015. Upper Albian chelonioid turtles from Poland. Geobios, 48, 385-395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kennedy, W.J. 2002. Nautiloids. In: A.B. Smith and D.J. Batten (Eds), Fossils of the Chalk. Palaeontological Association Field Guide to Fossils, 2 (2nd ed.), 219-231.Google Scholar

  • Kennedy, W.J. and Garrison, R.E. 1975. Morphology and genesis of nodular phosphates in the Cenomanian Glauconitic Marl of south-east England. Lethaia, 8, 339-360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kennedy, W.J. and Machalski, M. 2015. A late Albian ammonite assemblage from the mid-Cretaceous succession at Annopol, Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 65, 461-469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kummel, B. 1956. Post-Triassic Nautiloid genera. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College in Cambridge, 114, 319-494.Google Scholar

  • Kummel, B. 1964. Nautiloidea-Nautilida. In: Moore, R.C. (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 3. K383-K457. Geological Society of America, Boulder and University of Kansas Press; Lawrence.Google Scholar

  • Machalski, M. and Kennedy, W.J. 2013. Oyster-bioimmured ammonites from the Upper Albian of Annopol, Poland: stratigraphic and palaeobiogeographic implications. Acta Geologica Polonica, 63, 545-554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Machalski, M. and Martill, D.M. 2013. First pterosaur remains from the Cretaceous of Poland. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 83, 99-104.Google Scholar

  • Machalski, M. and Olszewska-Nejbert, D. 2015. A new mode of ammonite preservation - implications for dating of condensed phosphorite deposits. Lethaia, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/let.12132 [in press] CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mapes, R.H., Landman, N.H., Cochran, K., Goiran, C., de Forges, B.R. and Renfro, A. 2010. Early taphonomy and significance of naturally submerged Nautilus shells from the New Caledonia region. Palaios, 25, 597-610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marcinowski, R. 1970. The Cretaceous transgressive deposits east of Częstochowa (Polish Jura Chain). Acta Geologica Polonica, 20, 413-449.Google Scholar

  • Marcinowski, R. 1980. Cenomanian ammonites from German Democratic Republic, Poland, and the Soviet Union. Acta Geologica Polonica, 30, 215-325.Google Scholar

  • Marcinowski, R. and Radwański, A. 1983. The mid-Cretaceous transgression onto the Central Polish Uplands (marginal part of the Central European Basin). Zitteliana, 10, 65-96.Google Scholar

  • Marcinowski, R. and Radwański, A. 1989. A biostratigraphic approach to the mid-Cretaceous transgressive sequence of the central Polish Uplands. Cretaceous Research, 10, 153-172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marcinowski, R. and Walaszczyk, I. 1985. Middle Cretaceous deposits and biostratigraphy of the Annopol section, Central Polish Uplands. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaft, Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Komissionen, 7, 27-41.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, T. 1983. Cretaceous nautiloids from Hokkaido - I. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 129, 9-25.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, T. and Muramoto, K. 1983. Cretaceous nautiloids from Hokkaido - II, Part 2. Three nautiloid species from the Santonian and Campanian of Hokkaido. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 130, 85-95.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, T. and Miyauchi, T. 1983. Cretaceous nautiloids from Hokkaido - III, Part 3. Some nautiloids from the Campanian of Soya, northern Hokkaido. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 132, 220-229.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, T., Takahashi, T., Obata, I. and Futakami, M. 1984a. Cretaceous nautiloids from Hokkaido - IV, Part 4. An interesting nautiloid species from the Cenomanian of Hokkaido. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 133, 288-299.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, T., Miyauchi, T., Kanie, Y., Miyata, Y and Ueda, Y. 1984b. Cretaceous nautiloids from Hokkaido - V, Part 5-7. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 134, 335-346.Google Scholar

  • Morton, S.G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. 88 pp., pls 1-19. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

  • Orbigny, A. d’ 1840-1842. Paléontologie Française. Terrains crétacés I, Céphalopodes. Masson, Paris, 662 pp. (1-120: 1840; 121-430: 1841; 431-662: 1842).Google Scholar

  • Orbigny, A. d’1850. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés faisant suite au cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de Géologie stratigraphiques. Masson, Paris, tome 2, 1-427.Google Scholar

  • Popov, E.V. and Machalski, M. 2014. Late Albian chimaeroid fishes (Holocephali, Chimaeroidei) from Annopol, Poland. Cretaceous Research, 47, 1-18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samsonowicz, J. 1925. Esquisse géologique des environs de Rachów sur la Vistule et les transgressions de l’Albien et du Cénomanien dans les sillon nord-européen. Sprawozdania Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 3, 45-118. [in Polish, French summary] Google Scholar

  • Samsonowicz, J. 1934. Explication de la feuille Opatów (zone 45, colonne 33). Service géologique de Pologne, Carte Géologique Générale de la Pologne au 100.000-e, 1-97. Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Schlüter, C.A. 1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. 2. Abtheilung, Lieferung 6-9. Palaeontographica, 24, i-x, 121-263.Google Scholar

  • Sharpe, D. 1853-1909. Description of the fossil remains of Mollusca found in the Chalk of England. Cephalopoda. Palaeontographical Society (London) Monograph, 68pp., 27 pls. (1853: p. 1-26, pls. 1-10; 1854: p. 27-36, pls. 11-16; 1855: p. 37-68, pls. 17-27; 1909: general title-page and index).Google Scholar

  • Shimansky, V.N. 1975. Cretaceous Nautiloids. Trudy Paleontologičeskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 150, 1-208. [In Russian] Google Scholar

  • Spath, L.F. 1927. Revision of the Jurassic cephalopod fauna of Kachh (Cutch). Memoir of the Geological Survey of India, New Series, 9, 1-84.Google Scholar

  • Teichert, K. 1964. Morphology of hard parts. In: Moore, R.C. (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 3. K13-K53. Geological Society and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar

  • Tintant, H. and Gauthier, H. 2006a. Eutrephoceras bouchardianum (d’Orbigny, 1840). In: Gauthier, H. (Ed.), Révision critique de la Paléontologie Française d’Alcide d’Orbigny. Volume IV, Céphalopodes Crétacés: p. 20. Backhys; Leiden.Google Scholar

  • Tintant, H. and Gauthier, H. 2006b. Pseudocenoceras? deslongchampsianum (d’Orbigny, 1840). In: Gauthier, H. (Ed.), Révision critique de la Paléontologie Française d’Alcide d’Orbigny. Volume IV, Céphalopodes Crétacés: p. 23. Backhys; Leiden.Google Scholar

  • Tintant, H. and Gauthier, H. 2006c. Pseudocenoceras? archiacianum (d’Orbigny, 1840). In: Gauthier, H. (Ed.), Révision critique de la Paléontologie Française d’Alcide d’Orbigny. Volume IV, Céphalopodes Crétacés: p. 23. Backhys; Leiden.Google Scholar

  • Voigt, E. 1968. Über Hiatus-Konkretionen (dargestellt an Beispielen aus dem Lias). Geologische Rundschau, 58, 281-296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walaszczyk, I. 1987. Mid-Cretaceous events at the marginal part of the Central European Basin (Annopol-on-Vistula section, Central Poland). Acta Geologica Polonica, 37, 61-74.Google Scholar

  • Wiedmann, J. 1960. Zur Stammesgeschichte jungmesozoischer Nautiliden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der iberischen Nautilinae d’Orb. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 115 (Liefg. 1-6), 144-206.Google Scholar

  • Wilmsen, M. 2000. Late Cretaceous nautilids from northern Cantabria, Spain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 50, 29-43.Google Scholar

  • Wilmsen, M. 2003. Sequence stratigraphy and palaeoceanography of the Cenomanian Stage in northern Germany. Cretaceous Research, 24, 525-568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilmsen, M. and Yazykova, E.A. 2003. Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 48, 481-490.Google Scholar

  • Wilmsen, M. and Esser, K. 2004. Latest Campanian to Early Maastrichtian (Cretaceous) nautiloids from the white chalk of Kronsmoor, northern Germany. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54, 489-498.Google Scholar

  • Wilmsen, M., Niebuhr, B. and Hiss, M. 2005. The Cenomanian of northern Germany: facies analysis of a transgressive biosedimentary system. Facies, 51, 242-263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wittler, F.A., Roth, R. and Legant, J. 1999. Die Nautiliden der oberen Kreide vom Süd- und Westrand des Münsterländer Beckens. Arbeitskreis Paläontologie Hannover, 27, 1-52.Google Scholar

  • Wright, C.W. and Wright, E.V. 1951. A survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Primarily a nomenclatorial revision of Daniel Sharpe’s „Description of the fossil remains of Mollusca found in the Chalk of England. Part I, Cephalopoda“ (1853-1857). The Palaeontographical Society (London) Monographs (for 1950), 41 pp.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-28

Accepted: 2015-10-30

Published Online: 2015-12-12

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Acta Geologica Polonica, ISSN (Online) 2300-1887, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agp-2015-0021.

Export Citation

© Acta Geologica Polonica. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in