Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Ed. by Horn, Christoph / Serck-Hanssen, Camilla
Together with Carriero, John / Meyer, Susan Sauvé
Editorial Board: Adamson, Peter / Allen, James V. / Bartuschat, Wolfgang / Curley, Edwin M / Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar / Floyd, Juliet / Förster, Eckart / Frede, Dorothea / Friedman, Michael / Garrett, Don / Grasshoff, Gerd / Guyer, Paul / Irwin, Terence / Kahn, Charles H. / Knuuttila, Simo / Koistinen, Olli / Kraut, Richard / Longuenesse, Béatrice / McCabe, Mary / Pasnau, Robert / Perler, Dominik / Reginster, Bernard / Simmons, Alison / Timmermann, Jens / Trifogli, Cecilia / Weidemann, Hermann / Zöller, Günter
4 Issues per year
CiteScore 2016: 0.26
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.270
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.111
Abstract: It is widely believed that Hugo Grotius played a central role in shaping a selfconsciously “modern” form of ethical philosophy in the seventeenth century. There is disagreement, however, about what is distinctively new or “modern” in Grotius’s thought. Moreover, Terence Irwin has argued recently that Grotius’s ideas marked no significant departure from an earlier “Aristotelian naturalist” orthodoxy. This essay argues that there is indeed something importantly new in Grotius: a theory of perfect rights as legitimate demands, which Grotius places at the heart of a complementary conception of morality. Morality, as Grotius conceives it, consists of “obligations” whose binding force cannot be reduced to reasons that recommend or “counsel” conduct, however strongly. Thus arose the modern problem: how to account for morality’s distinctive normative force or “authority”.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.