Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie

Ed. by de Boer, Karin / Carriero, John / Horn, Christoph / Meyer, Susan Sauvé / Serck-Hanssen, Camilla

Editorial Board: Adamson, Peter / Allen, James V. / Bartuschat, Wolfgang / Curley, Edwin M / Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar / Floyd, Juliet / Förster, Eckart / Frede, Dorothea / Friedman, Michael / Garrett, Don / Grasshoff, Gerd / Guyer, Paul / Irwin, Terence / Kahn, Charles H. / Knuuttila, Simo / Koistinen, Olli / Kosch, Michelle / Kraut, Richard / Longuenesse, Béatrice / McCabe, Mary / Pasnau, Robert / Perler, Dominik / Radcliffe, Elizabeth S. / Reginster, Bernard / Simmons, Alison / Timmermann, Jens / Trifogli, Cecilia / Weidemann, Hermann / Zöller, Günter

CiteScore 2018: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.195

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 101, Issue 1


Measuring Humans against Gods: on the Digression of Plato’s Theaetetus

Jens Kristian Larsen
Published Online: 2019-03-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-1001


The digression of Plato’s Theaetetus (172c2–177c2) is as celebrated as it is controversial. A particularly knotty question has been what status we should ascribe to the ideal of philosophy it presents, an ideal centered on the conception that true virtue consists in assimilating oneself as much as possible to god. For the ideal may seem difficult to reconcile with a Socratic conception of philosophy, and several scholars have accordingly suggested that it should be read as ironic and directed only at the dramatic character Theodorus. When interpreted with due attention to its dramatic context, however, the digression reveals that the ideal of godlikeness, while being directed at Theodorus, is essentially Socratic. The function of the passage is to introduce a contemplative aspect of the life of philosophy into the dialogue that contrasts radically with the political-practical orientation characteristic of Protagoras, an aspect Socrates is able to isolate as such precisely because he is conversing with the mathematician Theodorus.

  • Åkesson, E. 1933. Episoden i Theaitetos. Göteborg.Google Scholar

  • Annas, J. 1999. Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

  • Armstrong, J. M. 2004. “After the Ascent: Plato on Becoming Like God.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26, 171–183.Google Scholar

  • Ausland, H. W. 2006. “Socrates’ Definitional Inquiries and the History of Philosophy.” In A Companion to Socrates. Eds. S. Ahbel-Rappe/R. Kamtekar. Oxford, 493–510.Google Scholar

  • Benardete, S. 1986. Plato’s Theaetetus – Part I of The Being of the Beautiful. Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Burger, R. 1999. The Phaedo: A Platonic Labyrinth. 2nd edition. South Bend, IN.Google Scholar

  • Burnet, J. (ed). 1924. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates, Crito. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Burnyeat, M. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Trans. M. J. Levett, rev. M. Burnyeat. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

  • –. 2012. “The Passion of Reason in Plato’s Phaedrus”. In his Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, vol. 2. Cambridge, 238–258.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, L. 1883. The Theaetetus of Plato: With a Revised Text and English Notes. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Chappell, T. 2004. Reading Plato’s Theaetetus. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, J. M. 1997. “Introduction”. In Plato – Complete Works, vii–xxvii. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

  • Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. London.Google Scholar

  • Dillon, J. 1993. Alcinous – The Handbook of Platonism. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Friedländer, P. 1960. Platon – Band III: Die Platonischen Schriften, zweite und dritte Periode. Zweite erweiterte und verbesserte Auflage. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Giannopoulou, Z. 2011. “Socrates and Godlikeness in Plato’s Theaetetus.” Journal of Philosophical Research 36, 135–148.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howland, J. 1998. The Paradox of Political Philosophy. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

  • Kahn, C. H. 1981. “Did Plato Write Socratic Dialogues?” Classical Quarterly 31, 305–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • –. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Klein, J. 1965. A Commentary on Plato’s Meno. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

  • Labriola, D. 2012. “Plato v. Status Quo: On the Motivation for Socrates’ Digression in the Theaetetus.” Apeiron 45, 91–108.Google Scholar

  • Lännström, A. 2011. “Socrates, the Philosopher in the Theaetetus Digression (172c–177c), and the Ideal of homoiôsis theôi”. Apeiron 44, 111–130.Google Scholar

  • Mahoney, T. 2004. “Is Assimilation to God in the Theaetetus Purely Otherworldly?” Ancient Philosophy 24, 321–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDowell, J. 1973. Plato: Theaetetus. Translation with Notes. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • McPherran, M. L. 2010. “Justice and Piety in the Digression of the Theaetetus.” Ancient Philosophy 30, 73–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, M. 2004. The Philosopher in Plato’s Statesman, with a New Preface, Together with “Dialectical Education and Unwritten Teachings in Plato’s Statesman.” Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar

  • Mintz, A. I. 2011. “Four Educators in Plato’s Theaetetus.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45, 657–673.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nightingale, A. W. 1992. “Plato’s Gorgias and Euripides’ Antiope: a Study in Generic Transformation.” Classical Antiquity 11, 121–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • –. 1995. Genres in Dialogue. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • –. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek PhilosophyTheoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Polansky, R. M. 1992. Philosophy and Knowledge: A Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus. Lewisburg.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Second edition. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Sedley, D. 1999. “The Ideal of Godlikeness”. In Plato 2 – Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Ed. G. Fine. Oxford, 309–328.Google Scholar

  • –. 2004. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • –. 2010. “Plato’s Theaetetus as an Ethical Dialogue.” In Ancient Models of Mind – Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Eds. A. Nightingale/D. Sedley. Cambridge, 64–74.Google Scholar

  • Snell, B. 1924. Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Stern, P. 2008. Knowledge and Politics in Plato’s Theaetetus. Cambridge.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rozema, D. 1998. “Plato’s Theaetetus: What to do with an Honours Student.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 32, 207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rue, R. 1993. “The Philosopher in Flight: The Digression in Plato’s Theaetetus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11, 71–100.Google Scholar

  • van Kooten, G. 2008. Paul’s Anthropology in Context. Tübingen.Google Scholar

  • Vlastos, G. 1983. “The Socratic Elenchus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 27–58.Google Scholar

  • Zuckert, C. H. 2009. Plato’s Philosophers. Chicago.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-03-06

Published in Print: 2019-03-01

Citation Information: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 1–29, ISSN (Online) 1613-0650, ISSN (Print) 0003-9101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-1001.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in