Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)

The Journal of National Agricultural and Food Centre

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.360

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1338-4376
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Heterosis and heterobeltiosis of yield associated traits in rapeseed cultivars under limited nitrogen application

Valiollah Rameeh
Published Online: 2012-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10207-012-0009-4

Half F2 diallel crosses of six spring cultivars of rapeseed (Brassicanapus L.) were used to estimate heterosis effects of yield components, seed yield, oil percentage, and oil yield under limited nitrogen condition. Significant mean squares of general and specific combining abilities (GCA and SCA) were detected for pods per main axis, pods per plant, length of pod, seeds per pods, 1000-seed weight, seed yield, and oil content and oil yield indicated respectively the importance of additive and non-additive genetic effects for these traits. High narrowsense heritability estimates for 1000-seed weight, oil percentage, and oil yield indicating the prime importance of additive genetic effects for these traits. Most of the cross combinations with significant positive heterobeltiosis for seed yield had also significant heterobeltiosis effects for pods per plant and pods on main axis; therefore these traits can be used as indirect selection criteria for improving seed yield. Significant positive correlation of mean performances with heterosis and heterobeltiosis effects for most of the traits except 1000-seed weight indicated that selection of the superior crosses based on heterosis and heterobeltiosis effects will be effective for their mean performances improving these traits except 1000- seed weight. Significant positive correlation was determined between pods per plant and seed yield, indicating that this trait can be used as good selection criterion for seed yield improvement. The crosses including RAS-3/99 × RW-008911 and RAS- 3/99 × RGS-003 with high significant positive heterobeltiosis effects of seed yield were superior combinations for seed yield increasing.

Keywords: correlation; combinations; diallel crosses; narrow-sense heritability

  • ALI, N. - JAVIDFAR, F. - ELMIRA, J.Y. - MIRZA, M.Y. 2003. Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). In Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 35, 2003, no. 2, pp. 167-174.Google Scholar

  • AMIRI-OGHANA, H. - FOTOKIANB, M.H. - JAVIDFAR, F. - ALIZADEH, B. 2009. Genetic analysis of grain yield, days to flowering and maturity in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) using diallel crosses. In International Journal of Plant Production, vol. 3, 2009, no. 2, pp. 19-26.Google Scholar

  • BRANDLE, J.E. - McVETTY, P.B.E. 1990. Geographical diversity parental selection and heterosis in oilseed rape. In Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 70, 1990, no. 4, pp. 935-940. DOI: 10.4141/cjps90-115CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DOWNEY, R.K. - RIMER S.R. 1993. Agronomic improvement in oilseed brassicas. In Advances in Agronomy, vol. 50, 1993, pp. 1-66.Google Scholar

  • GRIFFING, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel systems. In Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, 1956, no. 4, pp. 463-493.Google Scholar

  • HASHEMI AMENEH, S. - NEMATZADEH, G. A. - BABAEIAN JELODAR, N. - GHASEMI CHAPI, O. 2010. Genetic evaluation of yield and yield components at advanced generations in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). In African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 5, 2010, no. 15, pp. 1958-1964.Google Scholar

  • HOLMES, M.R.J. 1980. Nutrition of the Oilseed Rape Crop. London : Applied Science Publishers LTD, 1980, p. 158.Google Scholar

  • HUANG, Z. - LAOSUWAN, P. - MACHIKOWA, T. - CHEN, Z. 2010. Combining ability for seed yield and other characters in rapeseed. In Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 17, 2010, pp. 39-47.Google Scholar

  • KATIYAR, R.K. - CHAMOLA, R. - CHOPRA, V.L. 2000. Heterosis and combining ability in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). In Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, vol. 60, 2000, no. 4, pp. 557-559.Google Scholar

  • KHAN, S. - FARHATULLAH, I. - KHALLIL, H. 2008. Phenotypic correlation analysis of elite F3 : 4 Brassica populations for quantitative and qualitative traits. In ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, vol. 3, 2008, pp. 38-42.Google Scholar

  • MADSEN, E. 1976. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry as a quick method of determination of oil content in rapeseed. In Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, vol. 53, 1976, no. 7, pp. 467-469.Google Scholar

  • MARJANOVIC-JEROMELA, A. - MARINKOVIC, R. - MIJIC, A. - JANKULOVSKA, M. - ZDUNIC, Z. 2007. Interrelationship between oil yield and other quantitative traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). In Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 8, 2007, no. 2, pp. 165-170.Google Scholar

  • MATHER, K. - JINKS J.L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. London : Chapman & Hall, 1982, pp. 255-287.Google Scholar

  • McVETTY, P.B.E. 1995. Review of performance and seed production of hybrid Brassicas. In Proceedings of 9th International Rapeseed Conference, July 4-7, Cambridge, 1995, pp. 98-103.Google Scholar

  • NASSIMI, A.W. - RAZIUDDIN SARDAR, A. - ALI, N. - ALI, S. - BAKHT, J. 2006b. Analysis of combining ability in Brassica napus L. lines for yield associated traits. In Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, 2006, no. 12, pp. 2333-2337. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.20CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NASSIMI, A.W. - RAZIUDDIN SARDAR, A. - NAUSHAD, A. 2006a. Study on heterosis in agronomic characters of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using diallel. In Journal of Agronomy, vol. 5, 2006, no. 3, pp. 505-508. DOI: 10.3923/ja.2006.505.508CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • QI, C.K. - GAO, G.J. - ZHANG, J.F. 2000. Analysis of heterosis among varieties or inbred lines in Brassica campestris. In Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, vol. 3, 2000, pp. 30-32.Google Scholar

  • QIAN, W. - SASS, O. - MENG, J. - LI, M. - FRAUEN, M. - JUNG, C. 2007. Heterotic patterns in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): I. Crosses between spring and Chinese semiwinter lines. In Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 115, 2007, no. 1, pp. 27-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-007-0537-xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • RAMEEH, V. - REZAI, A. - SAEIDI, G. 2004. Study of salinity tolerance in rapeseed. In Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 35, 2004, no. 19-20, pp. 2849-2866. DOI: 10.1081/CSS-200036472CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • RAMEEH, V. 2010. Combining ability and factor analysis in F2 diallel crosses of rapeseed varieties. In Plant Breeding and Seed Science, vol. 62, 2010, pp. 73-83. DOI:102478/ v10129-011-0006-1Google Scholar

  • REZAI, A.M. - SAEIDI, G. 2005. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in early growth stages of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes. In Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, vol. 65, 2005, no. 4, pp. 269-273.Google Scholar

  • RIAZ, A. - LI, G. - QURESH, Z. - SWATI, M.S. - QUIROS, C.F. 2001. Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus inbred lines based on sequence related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance. In Plant Breeding, vol. 120, 2001, no. 5, pp. 411-415. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00636.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SABAGHNIA, N. - DEHGHANI, H. - ALIZADEH, B. - MOHGHADDAM, M. 2010. Diallel analysis of oil content and some agronomic traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) based on the additive-dominance genetic model. In Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 4, 2010, no. 8, pp. 609-616.Google Scholar

  • SHEN, J.X. - FU, T.D. - YANG, G.S. 2002. Heterosis of double low self-incompatibility in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). In Agricultural Sciences in China, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 732-737.Google Scholar

  • SINGH, M. - SINGH, L. - SRIVASTAVA, S.B.L. 2010. Combining ability analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss). In Journal of Oilseed Brassica, vol. 1, 2010, no. 1, pp. 23-27.Google Scholar

  • TEKLWOLD, A. - BECKER, H.C. 2005. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of Ethiopian mustard inbred lines. In Crop Science, vol. 45, 2005, no. 6, pp. 2629-2635. DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.0085CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ZHANG, G. - ZHU, W. 2006. Genetic analyses of agronomic and seed quality traits of synthetic oilseed Brassica napus produced from interspecific hybridization of B. campetris and B. oleracesea. In Journal of Genetics, vol. 85, 2006, pp. 45-51.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-11-08


Citation Information: Agriculture, Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 77–84, ISSN (Online) 1338-4376, ISSN (Print) 0551-3677, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10207-012-0009-4.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in