Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)

The Journal of National Agricultural and Food Centre

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.360

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1338-4376
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Integrated Land Evaluation for Sustainable Agricultural Production by Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

Amin Sharififar Msc. / Hadi Ghorbani PhD. / Haji Karimi PhD.
Published Online: 2013-10-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2013-0012

Abstract

This study discusses sustainable agricultural production by land evaluation based on a multiple criteria approach. The study was carried out in the Bastam region located at the north Shahrood township of Semnan Province in the northeast of Iran. Soil, landscape and climatic data were collected to assess the study area based on its capability for cultivation of apple, tomato, wheat and white potato. Making the final decision for growing the most appropriate crop was based upon three criteria: (1) the physical suitability of the study area for crop cultivation; (2) environmental consideration; (3) economic benefit accruing from the production of each crop. The results of the assessment of the above criteria were incorporated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. Ultimately, wheat was found to be the most suitable crop for cultivation considering all the criteria in the study area. This study, therefore, was a step taken towards promoting sustainable agriculture by trying to introduce as efficient an approach as possible in land use planning, and selecting the most sustainable ways to put the land to optimum use.

Keywords: land use planning; environmental assessment; economic evaluation; Analytical Hierarchy Process

  • BOIX, L.R. - ZINCK, J.A. 2008. Land-use planning in the Chaco Plain (Burruyacu, Argentina). Part 1: Evaluating land-use options to support cop diversification in an agricultural frontier area using physical land evaluation. In Environmental Management, vol. 42, no. no. 2, pp. 1043-1063. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9208-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CEBALLOS-SILVA, A. - LOPEZ-BLANCO, J. 2003. Delineation of suitable areas for crops using a Multi-Critera Evaluation approach and land use/ cover mapping: a case study in Central Mexico. In Agricultural Systems, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 117-136. DOI: 10.1016/s0308-521x(02)00103-8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De la ROSA, D. - ANAYA-ROMERO, M. - DIAZ-PEREIRA, E. - HEREDIA, N. - SHAHBAZI, F. 2009. Soil-specific agro-ecological strategies for sustainable land use-a case study by using MicroLEIS DSS in Sevilla Province (Spain). In Land Use Policy, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1055-1065. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De la ROSA, D. - MAYOL, F. - DIAZ-PEREIRA, E. - FERNANDEZ, M. - De la ROSA, Jr.D. 2004. A land evaluation decision support system (MicroLEIS DSS) for agricultural soil protection with special reference to the Mediterranean region. In EnvironmentalModelling & Software, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 929-942. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.10.006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De la ROSA, D. - MORENO, J.A. - GARCIA, L.V. - ALMORZA. J. 1992. MicroLEIS: A microcomputerbased Mediterranean land evaluation information system. In Soil Use and Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1992.tb00900.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeMIREL, T. - MUSDAL, H. - DeMIREL, N.C. - YUCENUR, G.N. 2009. Multi-criteria evaluation of land cover policies using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ANP: The case of Turkey. In Human and EcologicalRisk Assessment, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 746-764. DOI:10.1080/10807030903051168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DIAZ-BALTEIRO, L. - ROMERO, C. 2008. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment. In Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 255, no. 8-9, pp. 3222-3241. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2008.01.038.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ERDAL, G. - ESENGUN, K. - ERDAL, H. - GUNDUZ, O. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. In Energy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 35-41. DOI: 10.1016.j.energy.2006.01.007.Google Scholar

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 1974. Soil Map of the World, Revised 1988. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 1976. A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin 32, Rome. ISBN 92-5-1001 11-1.Google Scholar

  • GHODSIPOUR, S.H. 2012. Analytical hierarchy process. Iran, Tehran: Amir Kabir University of Technology Publications (In Persian). ISBN 978-964-463-056-9.Google Scholar

  • HUANG, I.B. - KEISLER, J. - LINKOV, I. 2011. Multicriteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. In Science of theTotal Environment, vol. 409, no. 19, pp. 3578-3594. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KALOGIROU, S. 2002. Expert systems and GIS: an application of land suitability evaluation. In Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 26, no. 2-3, pp. 89-112. DOI: 10.1016/s0198-9715(01)00031-x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MENDAS, A. - DELALI, A. 2012. Integration of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in GIS to develop land suitability for agriculture: Application to durum wheat cultivation in the region of Mleta in Algeria. In Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 83, pp. 117-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.02.003. Ministry of Agriculture. 2003. A study of comparativeadvantage in selected agricultural commodities. Tehran, Iran: Agricultural Planning and Economic Research Institute (APERI). 496 pp. ISBN 964-5549-16-7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MOHAMMADI, A. - TABATABAEEFAR, A. - SHAHIN, S. - RAFIEE, S. - KEYHANI, A. 2008. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. In Energy Conversionand Management, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3566-3570. DOI: 10.1016/j.econman.2008.07.003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • REZAEI-MOGHADAM, K. - KARAMI, E. 2008. A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. In Environment,Development and Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 407-426. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-006-9072-1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SAATY, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill International Book Company. 287 pp. ISBN 0-07-054371-2.Google Scholar

  • SAATY, T.L. 1994. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytical hierarchy process. In European Journal of Operational Research. vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 426-447. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SAATY, T.L. 2001. Decision making for leaders: Theanalytic hierarchy process for decision in a complexworld, vol. 2. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. 323 pp. ISBN 096203178x.Google Scholar

  • SAMRANPONG, C. - EKASINGH, B. - EKASINGH, M. 2009. Economic land evaluation for agricultural resource management. In Environmental Modellingand Software, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1381-1390. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SHAHBAZI, F. - JAFARZADEH, A.A. 2010. Integrated assessment of rural lands for sustainable development using MicroLEIS DSS in West Azerbaijan, Iran. In Geoderma, vol. 157, no. 3-4, pp. 175-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SUBRAMANIAN, N. - RAMANATHAN, R. 2012. A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. In International Journal ofProduction Economics, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 215-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SYS, C. - VAN RANST, E. - DEBAVEYE, J. 1993. Landevaluation. Part 3: Crop requirements. Brussels: Agricultural Publications 7,3. General Administration of Development Cooperation of Belgium. 199 p. Google Scholar

  • USDA 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 11th edition. Soil Survey Staff, United States Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, DC. 344 pp. ISBN: 016085427X.Google Scholar

  • WU, C. - BARNES, D. 2011. A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. In Journal ofPurchasing & Supply Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 256-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.201 1.09.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-10-20

Published in Print: 2013-09-01


Citation Information: Agriculture, Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 131–140, ISSN (Online) 1338-4376, ISSN (Print) 0551-3677, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2013-0012.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in