Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)

The Journal of National Agricultural and Food Centre

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.360

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Response Of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Crop And Broad-Leaved Weeds To Different Water Requirements And Weed Management In Sandy Soils

Ibrahim M. El-Metwally / Ramadan. E. Abdelraouf / Mohamed A. Ahmed / Oussama Mounzer / Juan José Alarcón / Magdi T. Abdelhamid
Published Online: 2015-04-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agri-2015-0007


Water scarcity is a major cause of crops yield reduction in many parts of the world. So, a more rational use of irrigation water should be adapted and deficit irrigation principles should be accepted with a certain level of reduction in yield level. To study the efficiency of four water requirements (100% whole season, 75% whole season, 50% whole season and 100% whole season while 50% at grain-filling stage) and five weed-control treatments (three postemergence herbicides i.e., metosulam, tribenuron-methyl, and bromoxynil), hand weeding and unweeded check, and their interactive effects, two field experiments on wheat crop were conducted in two successive seasons at the agricultural experimental station of the National Research Centre, Nubaria, Egypt. Bromoxynil, tribenuron-methyl came in the first order for controlling total broad-leaved weeds. Application of 100% water requirement recorded the highest values compared to all other irrigation water treatments in term of flag-leaf area, chlorophyll content, plant height, number of spike/m2, spike weight, grains number/spike, weight of 1,000 grains, yield and yield attributes of wheat. Metosulam followed by bromoxynil, tribenuron-methyl and hand-weeding treatments gave higher values of grain yield/ha. The highest grain yield, protein and carbohydrates percentages of wheat grains were obtained from addition of 100% water requirement with metosulam treatment was used followed by 75% of water requirement combined with metosulam treatment without significant difference among these treatments.

Key words: Bromoxynil; deficit irrigation; herbicides metosulam; tribenuron-methyl; Triticum aestivum L.; weed control


  • ACEVEDO, E. – SILVA, P. – SILVA, H. 2002. Wheat growth and physiology. In CURTIS, B.C. (Ed.) Bread Wheat: Improvement and Production, FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No. 30. Rome, Italy, 2002. p. 567. Available from: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y4011e/y4011e06.htm> (last access 19.03.2015).

  • ALLEN, R.G. – PEREIRA, L.S. – RAES, D. – SMITH, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements – FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar

  • BHAT, M.A. – MAHAL, S.S. – HUSSAIN, A. – MUSHKI, G.M. 2006. Effect of nitrogen levels, irrigation regimes and weed management in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). In Indian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 184–188.Google Scholar

  • CHAPMAN, H.D. – PRATT, R.F. 1978. Methods analysis for soil, plant and water. University of California Div. Agric. Sci. pp. 16–38.Google Scholar

  • EL-METWALLY, I.M. 2002. Performance wheat cultivars and associated weeds to some weed control treatments. In Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 29, pp. 1907–1927.Google Scholar

  • EL-METWALLY, I.M. – EL-ROKIEK, K.G. 2007. Response of wheat plants and accompanied weeds to some new herbicides alone or combined in sequence. In Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 513–525.Google Scholar

  • EL-METWALLY, I.M. – SAUDY, H.S. 2009. Herbicides tank- mixtures efficiency on weeds and wheat productivity. In Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, vol. 47, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar

  • EL-METWALLY, I.M. – ABD EL-SALAM, M.S. – TAGOUR, R.M.H. 2010. Nitrogen fertilizer levels and some weed control treatments effects on barley and associated weeds. In Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, vol. 1, pp. 992–1000.Google Scholar

  • EL-BAWAB, A.M.O. – KHOLOUSY, A.O. 2003. Effect of seeding rate and method of weed control on the productivity of Giza 2000, a promising barley line, under new lands condition. In Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 81, pp. 1085–1098.Google Scholar

  • EL-SHEREF, E.M. – OMAR, A.M. – EL-HAG, A.A. – SHAHEN, A.M. 2007. Effect of some agricultural treatments on barley yield and some technological characters. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 32, pp. 1671–1690.Google Scholar

  • FAGERIA, N.K. – BALIGAR, V.C. – JONES, C.A. 2010. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops. Third Edition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 586 pp. ISBN 9781439816950.Google Scholar

  • GOMEZ, K.A. – GOMEZ, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. A Wiley – Inter Science Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA. 680 pp.Google Scholar

  • HEFNAWY, F.A. – WAHBA, M.F. 2003. Effect of water stress in late growth stages of some wheat cultivars. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 28, pp. 729–745.Google Scholar

  • KASSAB, O.M. – EL-ZEINY, H. 2005. Effect of water stress and paclobutrazol application on growth and yield of wheat plants. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 30, pp. 1881–1888.Google Scholar

  • KRAMER, P.J. – BOYER, J.S.1995. Water relationship of plants and soils. Academic Press, San Diego. 495 p.Google Scholar

  • MAHGOUB, A.A.S. 2001. Quantitative determination of the gene action of stripe, stem and leaf rust resistance in A 6-parent daiallel cross of wheat. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 26, pp. 147–155.Google Scholar

  • MAHGOUB, H.S. – SAYED, M.A. 2001. Response of two wheat cultivars to irrigation amount and nitrogen level in sandy soils. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 26, pp. 1863–1873.Google Scholar

  • MOSAAD, M.G. – ORTIZ-FERRARA, G. – MAHALAKSHMI, V. 1995. Tiller development and contribution to yield under different moister regimes in two Triticum species. In Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 174, pp. 173–180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1995.tb01100.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MINOLTA CAMERA CO. 1989. Manual for chlorophyll meter SPAD-502. Minolta Camera Co., Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar

  • NASSAR, A.N.M. 2008. Response of two barley varieties to mineral and biological nitrogenous fertilizer and weed control treatments. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 33, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

  • NISHA, C. – HARPAL, S. – TRIPATHI, H.P. – CHOPRA, N. – SINGH, H. 1999. Critical period of weed crop competition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). In Indian Journal of Weed Science, vol. 31, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar

  • OWEIS, T. – HACHUM, A.Y. 2003. Improving water productivity in the dry areas of west Asia and north Africa. In KIJNE, J.W. – BARKER, R. – MOLDEN, D. (Eds.) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CAB International. pp. 179–198.Google Scholar

  • OUDA, S.A. 2006. Predicting the effect of water and salinity stresses on wheat yield and water needs. In Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 2, pp. 750–756. http://www.aensiweb.com/old/jasr/jasr_october_2006.html.

  • PASSIOURA, J.B. – ANGUS, J.F. 2010. Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments. In Advances in Agronomy, vol. 106, pp. 37–75.Google Scholar

  • RAMADAN, A.R. – AWAAD, S.S. 2008. Response of yield and yield attributes of some bread wheat varieties to irrigation levels and seeding rate under old land conditions. In Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University, vol. 33, pp. 4717–4737.Google Scholar

  • RASHID, A. – KHAN, R.U. 2008. Comparative effect of varieties and fertilizer levels on barley (Hordeum vulgare). In International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 124–126. http://www.fspublishers.org/published_papers/20955_..pdf.

  • RUEDA-AYALA, V.P. – RASMUSEM, J. – GERHARDS, R. – FOURNAISE, N.E. 2011. The influence of post emergence weed harrowing on selectivity, crop recovery and crop yield in different crop stages of winter wheat. In Weed Research, vol. 51, 478–788. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00873.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SAINI, H.S. – SEDGLEY, M. – SPINALL, D.A. 1984. Development anatomy in wheat of male sterility by induced by heat stress. Water deficit or abscisic acid. In Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 11, pp. 243–254. DOI:10.1071/PP9840243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SHABAN, S.A. – SOLIMAN, S. – YEHIA, Z.R. – EL ATTAR, M.H. 2009. Weed competition effects on some Triticum aestivum quality and quantity components. In Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 31, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar

  • SHEHAZD, M.A. – NADEEM, M.A. – IQBAL, M. 2012. Weed control and yield attributes against postemergence herbicides application in wheat crop, Punjab, Pakistan. In Global Advanced research Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 1, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar

  • SLAFER, G.A. – SATORRE, E.H. 1999. Wheat: Ecology and physiology of yield determination. Haworth Press Technology and Industrial, pp. 322–323. ISBN 1-56022-874-1.Google Scholar

  • SMITH, F. – GILLES, M.A. – HAMILTON, J.K. – GODEES, P.A. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugar related substances. In Analytical Chemistry, vol. 28, pp. 350–356.Google Scholar

  • TAWFIK, M.M. – EL-KRAMANY, M.F. – BAHR, A.A. 2005. A comparative study on the effect of water stress at different reproductive stages of growth of four wheat cultivar. In Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 2, pp. 243–255.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-02-02

Published Online: 2015-04-27

Published in Print: 2015-03-01

Citation Information: Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo), Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 22–32, ISSN (Online) 1338-4376, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agri-2015-0007.

Export Citation

© Ibrahim M. El-Metwally et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in