Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)

The Journal of National Agricultural and Food Centre

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.360

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1338-4376
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Effectiveness Of Soil Conservation To Erosion Control On Several Land Use Types

Halus Satriawan / Erwin Masrul Harahap / Rahmawaty / Abubakar Karim
Published Online: 2015-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agri-2015-0011

Abstract

The erosion plot method for direct evaluation in agriculture became necessary to (1) quantify soil erosion on cocoa, areca and oil palm, (2) determine the most effective soil conservation, and (3) calculate nutrient content in sediment. The experiment was treated with three conservation practices and the conventional treatment as control in a completely randomised block design. The results showed for the areca land use, that soil conservation with ridges + maize produced the lowest erosion (1.68 t/ha). For cocoa land use, the ridges + groundnut treatment produced the lowest erosion (8.2 t/ha). For oil palm land use, the cover crop of Mucuna bracteata had lowest erosion yield (12.2 t/ha). Soil conservation techniques significantly affected the levels of organic C and available P under the cocoa land use, where ridges + maize have the lowest content of organic C and available P in soil sediment (1.03% and 0.69 ppm). Soil conservation at areca land use also has a significant effect on the levels of organic C and available N, but it did not affect significantly the levels of available P and exchangeable K sediments, where ridges + groundnut have lowest organic C and available N in sediment (1.4% and 0.18%). Furthermore, soil conservation on the land use of oil palm showed a significant effect on the levels of available P, but did not significantly affect the levels of organic C, available N and exchangeable K sediments. Soil conservation with cover crops Mucuna bracteata showed the lowest available P in sediments (0.86 ppm).

Keywords: land use; nutrient; sediment; soil erosion; soil conservation

REFERENCES

  • BERTOL, I.B. – MELLO, E.L. – GUADAGNIN, J.C. – ZAPAROLLI, A.L.V. – CARRAFA, M.R. 2003. Nutrient losses by water erosion. In Scientia Agricola, vol. 60, p. 581–586.Google Scholar

  • INDONESIA INVESTMENT COORDINATING BOARD. 2013. Komoditas Unggulan Daerah. Retrieved December 15 from PubMed database on the world wide web: http://regionalinvestment.bkpm.go.id/newsipid/id/commodityarea.php?ia=11&ic=2580

  • FENTON, T.E. – KAZEMI, M. – LAUTERBACH-BARRETT, M.A. 2005. Erosional impact on organic matter content and productivity of selected Iowa soils. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 81, pp. 163–171.Google Scholar

  • FITRI, R. 2010. Planning of farming system based on Areca catechu L for sustainable agricultural development in South Peusangan District of Aceh Province. In Proceedings of the National Seminar and Annual Meeting of the Dean of Agricultural Sciences BKS – PTN West Regional 2010. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bengkulu. ISBN 979-602-96609-8-2. p 548.Google Scholar

  • FUADY, Z. – SATRIAWAN, H. 2011. Application of the mound to against the surface flow rate and erosion. In Proceedings of the National Seminar in Precision Farming. Post Graduate Forum, North Sumatera Utara University, Medan. Indonesia. ISBN 979-458-591-2. pp 489–495.Google Scholar

  • GOMEZ, J.A. – SOBRINO, T.A. – GIRALDEZ, J.V. – FERERES, E. 2009. Soil management effects on runoff, erosion and soil properties in a olive grove of Southern Spain. In Soil & Tillage Research, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar

  • HIDAYAT, Y.– MURTILAKSONO, K. – SINUKABAN, N. 2012. Characterization of surface runoff, soil erosion and nutrient loss on forest-agriculture landscape. In Journal of Tropical Soils, vol.17, no. 3, pp. 259–266.DOI: 10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.259.Google Scholar

  • HUDSON, N.W. 1993. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. FAO soil bulletin 68. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation, Rome. pp. 139.Google Scholar

  • JAE-YOUNG CHO – KWANG-WAN HAN, 2002. Nutrient losses from a paddy field plot in Central Corea. In Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol.134, pp. 215–228.Google Scholar

  • JOKELA, W. – CASLER, M.D. 2011. Transport of phosphorus and nitrogen in surface runoff in a corn silage system: Paired watershed methodology and calibration period results. In Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 91, pp. 479–491. DOI:10.4141/CJSS09095.Google Scholar

  • NOER, H. 2011. Optimizing utilization of water resources through improved planting pattern and repair cultivation techniques in farming systems. In Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 2, no. 2, p.169–182.Google Scholar

  • NOERALAM, A.S. – ARSYAD, S.– ISWANDI, A. 2003. Control Techniques of Surface Flow on sloping dry land farming. In Jurnal Tanah dan Lingkungan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–16.Google Scholar

  • PIMENTEL, D. 2006. Soil erosion: A food and environmental threat. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 8, pp. 119–137. DOI 10.1007/s10668-1262-8.Google Scholar

  • PRATAP NARAIN – SINGH, R.K. – SINDHWAL, N.S. – JOSHIE, P. 1998. Agroforestry for soil and water conservation in the western Himalayan Valley region of India. In Agroforesty System, vol. 39, pp. 175–189.Google Scholar

  • SANCHEZ, M.M. – SORIANO, M. – DELGADO, G. – DELGADO, R. 2002. Soil quality in mediterranian mountain environments: Effects of land use change. In Soil Science Society of American Journal, vol. 66, pp. 948–958.Google Scholar

  • SATRIAWAN, H. – FUADY, Z. 2012. Referral Land Use For Agricultural Development in Peusangan Selatan Sub-district. In Proceedings of the National Seminar and Annual Meeting of the Dean of Agricultural Sciences BKS – PTN West Regional 2012. Faculty of Agriculture University of Sumatera Utara. ISBN 979-458-597-1. pp 497.Google Scholar

  • SATRIAWAN, H. – E.M. HARAHAP. 2013. Study of soil erosion in KruengSieumpo Watershed Aceh. In Proceedings of the National Seminar on Community-Based Watershed Management Towards Sustainable Aceh Forest, Banda Aceh. ISBN 978-979-8278-89-1. p. 171–180Google Scholar

  • SATRIAWAN, H. – HARAHAP, E.M. – RAHMAWATY, – KARIM, A. 2014. Land capability evaluation for agriculture in Krueng Sieumpo watershed, Aceh. In Academic Research International, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55–63.Google Scholar

  • SHARPLEY, A.N. – SMITH, J. 1990. Soil erosion on agricultural land. In BOARDMAN, I.D. – FOSTER, L. – DEARING, J.A. (Eds.) Phosphorus Transport in Agricultural Runoff : The Role of Soil Erosion. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 351–366.Google Scholar

  • THOMAS, A.D. – WALSH, R.P.D. – SHAKESBY, R.A. 1999. Nutrient losses in eroded sediment after fire in eucalyptus and pine forests in the wet Mediterranean environment of northern Portugal. In Catena, vol. 36, pp. 283–302.Google Scholar

  • WOLF, B. – SNYDER, G.H. Sustainable Soils. The Place of Organic Matter in Sustainability Soils and Their Productivity. New York : Food Product Press. 2003.pp. 352.Google Scholar

  • ZUAZO, D.V.H. – MARTÍNEZ, A.R. – RUIZ, J.A. 2004. Nutrient losses by runoff and sediment from thetaluses of orchard terraces. In Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 153, no. 1–4, pp. 355–373. DOI:10.1023/B:WATE.0000019956.17314.88.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-03-02

Published Online: 2015-09-01

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo), ISSN (Online) 1338-4376, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agri-2015-0011.

Export Citation

© Halus Satriawan et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in