Akai, N., Nishimura Y., Sakata M., Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Growth and Economic Volatility - Theory and Evidence from State-level Cross-section Data for the United States, DiscussionPaper Series No. 03-F-2, The Center for International Trade Studies, Faculty of Economics, Yokohama National University, 2004Google Scholar
 Bahl, Roy W., Linn, J.F.,, Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries, New York, 1992Google Scholar
 Barro, R., Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Political Economy 98, 108-125, 1990Google Scholar
 Davoodi, Hamid, Heng-fu Zou, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth:A Cross-Country Study, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, p.p. 244-257, 1998Google Scholar
 Eurostat. Statistics Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu, accessed on March 22, 2012Google Scholar
 Malik Shahnawaz, Hassan Mahmood-ul, Hussain Shahzad, Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in Pakistan, The Pakistan Development Review 45: 4 Part II (Winter 2006), pp. 845-854, 2006Google Scholar
 Oates, Wallace E., Fiscal Federalism. New York, 1972Google Scholar
 Oates, Wallace E., On the Theory and Practice of Fiscal Decentralization. CREI Working Paper No. 1/2007, 2007Google Scholar
 Prud’homme, R., On the Dangers of Decentralization, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1252, Washington, D.C., 1994Google Scholar
 Samimi, A., Lar, S., Haddad, G., Alizadeh, M., Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Iran, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(11): 5490-5495, 2010Google Scholar
 Tiebout, C.M., A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. In Journal of Political Economy No. 64, p.p 416-424, 1956Google Scholar
 Thiessen, U., Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes. Working paper No 1/January 2001Google Scholar
 Wingender, Ph., Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Case Study for Canada, Masters research report, Université de Montréal, Tuesday, July 12th 2005, WINP28028006, 2005Google Scholar
 Xie, Danyang, Heng-fu Zou, Hamid Davoodi, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States, in Journal of Urban Economics, 45, p.p. 228-239, 1999Google Scholar
 Zhang, Tao, Heng-fu Zou, Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China, in Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 67, p.p. 221-240, 1998Google Scholar
 Britannica World Data, Profile, Malta. 2008. Available at: <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/360532/Malta> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 CDSP, Elections in the EU of 27. Malta, 2010. Available at: <http://cdsp.sciencespo. fr/fichiers_elections25_ANG/MALTA_ANG.pdf> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 CLGF (Commonwealth Local Government Forum). Country Profiles. The local government system in Cyprus. Available at: <http://www.clgf.org.uk/userfiles/1/files/Cyprus%20local%20government%20profile%202011-12.pdf> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development, 2009. History and Progress of Territorial Reform in Latvia. Available at: <http://www.raplm.gov.lv/uploads/filedir/History%20and%20progress%20of%20territorial%20 reform%20in%20Latvia_web.pdf> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 Wikipedia. Available at: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Estonia> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 Wikipedia. Available at: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Lithuania> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
 Wikipedia. Available at: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Slovenia> [accessed on March 27, 2012]Google Scholar
Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University - Economics
The Journal of "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University from Iasi
3 Issues per year
Fiscal Decentralization: Is It a Good Choice for the Small New Member States of the EU?
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth in six small new member state of the European Union, namely Cyprus, Malta, Slovenia, and the Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania for the period 2000-2010. The empirical analysis is based on the multiple regression method.
The conclusion is that fiscal decentralization is a reliable instrument for an increase in budget performance efficiency in the small new member states of the EU. There is a positive relationship between the subnational share of total government expenditure and revenue (used as measures of fiscal decentralization) and economy growth. At the same time during the analyzed period the subnational revenue and expenditure presented as ratios to GDP have negatively affected economy growth in the analyzed countries. The relationship is not linear and the effects of changes in the ratios are not proportional. Because of that the policies promoting decentralization must be built on the base of precise analysis.
However, the empirical analysis of fiscal decentralization is still at an early stage and it is premature to draw definitive conclusions from these preliminary results.