Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Asian Journal of Law and Economics

The Official Publication of the Asian Law and Economics Association

Editor-in-Chief: Kim, Jeong-Yoo

Ed. by Khong, Dennis / Lee, Sang-Ho / Qiao, Yue / Liu, Zhiyong (John) / Kim, Duol / Choi, Albert / Chang, Yun-Chien

Online
ISSN
2154-4611
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Anti-Competitive Behaviour of State Monopolies from the Economics Approach with Reference to Vietnam’s State Monopolies

Tran Thang Long
  • Corresponding author
  • Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Vice Dean of Faculty of Legal Languages, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-11-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2018-0015

Abstract

This paper studies the theoretical underpinning of anti-competitive behaviour of state monopolies under different economics approaches and focuses particularly on the Structure–Conduct–Performance (SCP) paradigm. It argues that the market conduct of state monopolies is no different from that of other firms and market power serves as the motivation for anti-competitive behaviour of firms. The paper ends with a discussion about Vietnam’s state monopolies and how their anti-competitive behaviour is explained from the viewpoint of the economics approach.

Keywords: Anti-competitive behaviour; competition policy; state monopolies; Structure–Conduct–Performance; Vietnam

References

  • Black, John, Nigar Hashimzade, and Gareth Myles. 2009. A Dictionary of Economics (Online), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bös, Dieter . 1989. Public Enterprise Economics: Theory and Application, Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar

  • Cane, Peter, and Joanne Conaghan. 2008. The New Oxford Companion to Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Corones Stephen G. 2010. Competition Law in Australia. 5th ed. Pyrmont: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar

  • Cuong, Le Phu 2003. Monopoly Situation in Vietnam, https://www.jftc.go.jp/eacpf/05/APECTrainingProgram2003/LePCuong.pdf.

  • Dabbah, Maher M 2010. International and Comparative Competition Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Doern, G. Bruce, and Stephen Wilks. 2001. Comparative Competition Policy: National Institutions in A Global Market. Oxford University Press, reprinted.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, Seanicaa, Albert J. Allen, and Saleem Shaik. 2006. Market Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypothesis Revisited using Stochastic Frontier Efficiency Analysis. 1–2. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10381823/Market-Structure-Conduct-Performance-(SCP)-Hypothesis-Revisited-using-Stochastic-Frontier-Efficiency-Analysis.

  • Ferguson, Paul R., and Glenys J. Ferguson. 1998. Industrial Economics: Issues and Perspectives. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fox, Eleanor M. 2001–2002. “US and European Merger Policy – Fault Lines and Bridges: Mergers That Create Incentives for Exclusionary Practices.” George Mason Law Review 10: 471, 474.Google Scholar

  • Geddes, Richard R. 2004. “Case Studies of Anti-competitive SOE Behaviour.” In Competing with the Government: Anti-competitive Behaviour and Public Enterprises, edited by Richard R. Geddes, 28. Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Graham, Edward M., and J. David Richardson, eds. 1997. Global Competition Policy. Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

  • Hovenkamp, Herbert J. 1985. “Antitrust Policy after Chicago.” Michigan Law Review 84 (2): 226–229.Google Scholar

  • International Competition Network (ICN). Report on the Objectives of Unilateral Conduct Laws, Assessment of Dominance/Substantial Market Power and State-created Monopolies, 65–66. DOI: .http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc353.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, Alison, and Brenda Sufrin. 2008. EC Competition Law: Text, Cases and Materials. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Loc, Truong Dong. 2006. “Equitisation and Stock-Market Development: The Case of Vietnam.” PhD in Economics Thesis. University of Groningen.Google Scholar

  • Long, Tran Thang, and Gordon Walker. 2012. “Abuse of Market Dominance by State Monopolies in Vietnam.” Houston Journal of International Law 34(2): 188.Google Scholar

  • Mason, E. S. 1939. “Price and Production Policies of Large Scale Enterprises.” American Economic Review 29: 61.Google Scholar

  • Mason, E. S. 1949. “The Current State of the Monopoly Problem in the United States.” Harvard Law Review 62: 1265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGowan, Lee 2010. The Antitrust Revolution in Europe: Exploring the European Commission’s Cartel Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Moles, Peter, and Nicholas Terry. 1997. The Handbook of International Financial Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Monti, Gorgio 2007. EC Competition Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • OECD. 2009. “State-Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality.” Policy Roundtable, DAF/COMP(2009)37, 27. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/52/46734249.pdf.

  • Posner, Richard A. 2001. Antitrust Law. 2nd ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Rodger, Barry J., and Angus MacCulloch. 2009. Competition Law in the EC and UK. 4th ed. Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar

  • Sappington, David E. M., and Gregory J. Sidak. 2003a. “Competition Law for State-Owned Enteprises.” Antitrust Law Journal 71 (2).Google Scholar

  • Sappington, David E. M., and Gregory J. Sidak. 2003b. “Incentives for Anticompetitive Behavior by Public Enterprises.” Review of Industrial Organisation 22. http://www.springerlink.com/content/l510108833125137/fulltext.pdf.

  • Sappington, David E. M., and Gregory J. Sidak. 2004. “Anti-competitive Behavior by SOEs: Incentives and Capabilities,” in Competing with the Government: Anti-competitive Behaviour and Public Enterprises, edited by Richard R. Geddes. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

  • Scheffman, David T., and Richard S. Higgins. 2003. “20 Years of Raising Rivals’ Costs: History, Assessment and Future.” George Mason Law Review 12 (2): 371. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265407138_Twenty_years_of_raising_rivals%27_costs_History_assessment_and_future.

  • Scherer, Frederic M. 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

  • Shleifer, Andrei. 1998. “State Versus Private Ownership.” Economic Perspective 12 (4): 130–150.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Rhonda L. n.d. Competition Law and Policy – Theoretical Underpinnings. http://www.regulationbodyofknowledge.org/documents/011.pdf.

  • Stewart, John F., Robert S. Harris, and Willard T. Carleton. 1984. “The Role of Market Structure in Merger Behaviour,” Journal of Industrial Economics 32 (3): 296–297.Google Scholar

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., et al. 1989. The Economic Role of the State.Google Scholar

  • Swedish Competition Authority. 2009. The Pros and Cons of Competition in/by the Public Sector. 46. http://www.konkurrensverket.se/globalassets/forskning/lankar-forslag-pa-uppsatsamne/the-pros-and-cons-of-competition-in-by-the-public-sector.pdf.

  • Taylor, Martyn. 2006. International Competition Law: A New Dimension for the WTO. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Toninelli, Pierangelo 2000. “The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprises, the Framework.” In The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprises in Western World, edited by Pierangelo Toninelli, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Trebilcock, Michael, and Edward Iacobucci. 2003. “Privatization and Accountability.” Harvard Law Review 116 (5): 1424.Google Scholar

  • van den Bergh, Roger, and Peter D. Camesasca. 2001. European Competition Law and Economics: A Comparative Perspective, 67–68. Intersentia.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, Leonard W. 1979. “The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127 (4): 1104–1140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winston, Clifford. 2006. Government Failure versus Market Failure – Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance. http://reg-markets.org/admin/authorpdfs/redirect-safely.php?fname=../pdffiles/php3v.pdf.

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-22


Citation Information: Asian Journal of Law and Economics, Volume 10, Issue 1, 20180015, ISSN (Online) 2154-4611, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2018-0015.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in