Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.351

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?

Amos Paran
Published Online: 2013-10-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014

Abstract

This paper examines the spread of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) through a number of lenses. It argues that the supporters and promoters of CLIL position it as a near-panacea and attribute to it a large number of benefits, not all of which are supported by research. Looking at the issues arising from recent attempts to define CLIL, the paper proposes a distinction between weak and strong CLIL. The paper points to the lacunae in the research into CLIL, and suggests that these gaps are the result of educational policies that privilege a second language over other curricular subjects. Looking at the contexts where CLIL seems to succeed, as well as places where such teaching has been acknowledged to fail, it emerges that success is often connected to a high level of student selection on a number of criteria, as well as a high level of investment in teachers and teaching, and that CLIL often privileges those students who are already high achievers both in language and content. The paper then looks at the way in which the spread of CLIL policies can be understood through theories of policy borrowing and educational transfer.

Keywords: CLIL; Bilingual Education; Policy Borrowing; Educational Transfer; Language Education

About the article

Amos Paran

Amos Paran is Senior Lecturer at the Institute of Education, University of London. He started his career as an EFL teacher in secondary schools in Israel and has since worked as a materials writer and teacher trainer in a variety of international contexts. His main research interests are reading in EFL and the use of literature in language teaching. He is editor of Literature in language learning and teaching (TESOL, 2006) and co-editor, with Lies Sercu, of Testing the untestable in language education (Multilingual Matters, 2010).


Published Online: 2013-10-12

Published in Print: 2013-10-25


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 317–342, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014.

Export Citation

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Josep Coral, Meritxell Urbiola, Eduard Sabaté, Josep Bofill, Teresa Lleixà, and Ruth Vilà Baños
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2017, Page 1
[2]
Erwin Maria Gierlinger
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2017, Volume 5, Number 2, Page 187
[3]
Javier Fernández Sanjurjo, José Miguel Arias Blanco, and Alberto Fernández-Costales
System, 2017
[4]
María Luisa Pérez Cañado and Nina Karen Lancaster
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2017, Volume 30, Number 3, Page 300
[5]
Javier Fernández-Sanjurjo, Alberto Fernández-Costales, and José Miguel Arias Blanco
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2017, Page 1
[6]
[8]
Jasone Cenoz and Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2015, Volume 28, Number 1, Page 1
[9]
Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe and Jasone Cenoz
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2015, Volume 28, Number 1, Page 90
[10]
Jasone Cenoz
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2015, Volume 28, Number 1, Page 8

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in