Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.286

See all formats and pricing
More options …

The social life of methods: Introducing the special issue

Gabriele Kasper
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, 1890 East West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Steven J. Ross
  • School of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, 3215 Jimenez Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0018


  • Antaki, Charles. 2011. Six kinds of applied conversation analysis. In Charles Antaki (ed.), Applied conversation analysis, 1–14. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Carolyn D. 1997. Membership categorization and interview accounts. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 162–176. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Briggs, Charles. L. 1986. Learning how to ask. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brown, James Dean. 2014. Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Button, Graham (ed.). 1991. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Choi, Seongsook & Keith Richards. 2016. Introduction to the Special Issue: Innovation in research methods in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 37(1). 1–6.Google Scholar

  • Cicourel, Aaron V. 1964. Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Drew, Paul, Geoffrey Raymond & Darin Weinberg (eds.). 2006. Talk and interaction in social research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Fitzgerald, Richard & William Housley (eds.). 2015. Advances in membership categorization analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Furukawa, T. 2010. Intertextuality, mediation, and members’ categories in focus groups on humor. Pragmatics and Society 1. 257–283.Google Scholar

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, G. Nigel & Michael Mulcay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s box. A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Greiffenhagen, Christian, Michael Mair & Wes Sharrock. 2011. From methodology to methodography: A study of qualitative and quantitative reasoning in practice. Methodological Innovations Online 6(3). 93–107.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2011. Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hester, Stephen & David Francis. 2007. Orders of ordinary action: Respecifying social knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Housley, William. 2003. Interaction in multidisciplinary teams. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Hulstijn, Jan, Richard F. Young & Lourdes Ortega. 2014. Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Editor’s introduction & Editor’s closing thoughts Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36. 361–421.Google Scholar

  • Huth, Torsten. 2010. Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second-language interaction. The Modern Language Journal 94. 537–553.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriele & Matthew T. Prior. 2015a. Analyzing story telling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly 49. 226–255.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriele & Matthew T. Prior. 2015b. “You said that?”: Other-initiations of repair addressed to represented talk. Text & Talk 35. 815–844.Google Scholar

  • Kiely, Richard & Pauline Rea-Dickins. 2005. Program evaluation in language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scientific practice and ordinary actions: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mackey, Alison & Emma Marsden (eds.). 2016. Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mair, Michael, Christian Greiffenhagen & Wes Sharrock. 2013. Social studies of social science: A working bibliography. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper 08/13.Google Scholar

  • Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora C. Schaeffer & Johannes van der Zouwen (eds.). 2002. Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, David L. 2012. Focus groups and social interaction. In Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti & Karyn D. McKinney (eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research, 2nd edn., 161–176. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Phakiti, A. & Carsten Roever. 2016. Quantitative methods for second language research: A problem-solving approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Plonsky, Luke (ed.). 2016. Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2012. Eight challenges for interview researchers. In Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti & Karyn D. McKinney (eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research, 2nd edn., 555–570. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Derek Edwards. 2012. Conversation analysis and psychology. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 701–725. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2011. Self-presentation in L2 interview talk: Narrative versions, accountability, and emotionality. Applied Linguistics 32. 60–76.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2014. Re-examining alignment in a ‘failed’ L2 autobiographic research interview. Qualitative Inquiry 20. 495–508.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2016a. Emotion and discourse in narrative research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2016b. Formulating and scaling emotionality in L2 qualitative research interviews. In Matthew T. Prior & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction, 203–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Puchta, Claudia & Jonathan Potter. 2004. Focus group practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Rapley, Timothy John. 2001. The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research 1. 303–323.Google Scholar

  • Richards, Keith. 2011. Using micro-analysis in interviewer training: ‘Continuers’ and interviewer positioning. Applied Linguistics 32. 95–112.Google Scholar

  • Richards, Keith, Steven J. Ross & Paul Seedhouse. 2012. Research methods for applied language studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Roulston, Kathryn. 2011. Interview ‘problems’ as topics for analysis. Applied Linguistics 32. 77–94.Google Scholar

  • Schütz, Alfred. 1954. Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. The Journal of Philosophy 51(9). 257–273.Google Scholar

  • Seale, Clive. 1988. Qualitative interviewing. In Clive Seale (ed.), Researching society and culture, 202–216. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Silverman, David (ed.). 2016. Qualitative research, 4th edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Steven. 2010. Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30. 128–148.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Steven & Keith Richards (eds.). 2011. Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: Discursive perspectives. Special Issue, Applied Linguistics 32(1).Google Scholar

  • Wei, Li & Melissa G. Moyer (eds.). 2008. The Blackwell guide to research methods in bilingualism and multilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Zimmerman, Don H. & Melvin Pollner. 1971. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life, 80–103. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-05

Published in Print: 2018-10-25

Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 475–486, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0018.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in