Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.286

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Pinpointing the role of the native language in L2 learning: Acquisition of spatial prepositions in English by Russian and Turkish native speakers

Elena Antonova Unlu
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1009

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the role of L1 in the acquisition of L2 by comparing the acquisition of the three spatial prepositions (in, on, at) in English by native speakers of Russian and Turkish. The study, adopting a comparative approach suggested by Jarvis (2000, Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning 50. 245–309), compared interlanguages of L2 learners with Russian and Turkish L1 backgrounds, and examined the interlanguages of the L2 learners in relation to their native languages. The data for the analysis were collected via utilizing two diagnostic tests and analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The findings demonstrated that that the acquisition of the prepositions differed not only quantitatively but also qualitatively between the groups. The study adds to the comparative research examining the role of L1s in the acquisition of L2 and the effect of cross-linguistic influence taking place from background languages.

Keywords: comparative research; cross-linguistic influence; spatial prepositions; English; Russian and Turkish L1 backgrounds

References

  • Abdulkarim, Humam. 2008. The communicative approach to teaching English prepositions to Arab students. Syria: Aleppo University PhD Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Açak, E. 2001. Acquisition of prepositions in English by Turkish learners. Erzurum Atatürk University MA Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Blom, Liane. 2006. Swedish problems with English prepositions. http://www.essays.se/essay/e6d93dbb55/ (accessed 22 July 2009).

  • Çabuk, Sakine. 2009. The use of prepositions in second language acquisition process. Middle East Technical University MA Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Rod. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Evin, F. Ş. 1993. An analysis of the avoidance behavior of freshman students of the university of Gaziantep in using local prepositions. University of Gaziantep MA Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Göksel, Asli & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Helms-Park, Rena. 2001. Evidence of lexical transfer in learner syntax. The acquisition of English causatives by speakers of Hindi-Urdu and Vietnamese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(1). 71–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jansson, H. 2006. Native Swedish speaker’s problems with English prepositions. Linguistics, C-level Essay. University of Örebro: Department of Humanities. http://oru.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:137490 (accessed 12 June 2009).

  • Jarvis, Scott. 2000. Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning 50. 245–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, Scott & Terence Odlin. 2000. Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22. 535–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Javis, Scott. 1998. Conceptual transfer in the interlanguage lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

  • Kamynina, Alexandra. 1999. Sovremennyi Russkij jazyk. Morfologija. [Modern Russian language. Morphology]. Moscow: Moskovskij Universitet.Google Scholar

  • Kellerman, Eric. 1983. Now you see it, now you don’t. In Susan Gass & Larry Selinker (eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

  • Kellerman, Eric & M. Sharwood. 1986. Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

  • Master, Peter Antony. 1987. A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system, University of California Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Odlin, Terence. 2000. Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning, 7th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Odlin, Terence. 2008. Cross-linguistic influence. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 436–487. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Reynolds, S. B. 2005. Preposition errors in the English of first generation Finnish Americans. Fixed patters of random mistakes. University of Oulu MA Thesis.Google Scholar

  • Selinker, Larry. 1969. Language transfer. General Linguistics 9. 67–92.Google Scholar

  • Susan, Gas & Larry Selinker. 2008. Second language acquisition: An introductory course, 3rd edn. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wade, Terence. 2010. A comprehensive Russian grammar, vol. 8. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-28


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1009.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in