Akiyoshi, A. 2010. Questioning the rationale for native speakers only in hiring practice: From parents’ perspective. Polyglossia 19. 13–25.
Allen, D. 2016. Japanese cram schools and entrance exam washback. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1). 54–67.
Amano, I. & G. Poole. 2005. The Japanese university in crisis. Higher Education 50. 685–711.
Au, K. & K. Blake. 2003. Cultural identity and learning to teach in a diverse community findings from a collective case study. Journal of Teacher Education 54(3). 192–205.
Benson, P. 2012. Learning to teach across borders: Mainland Chinese student English teachers in Hong Kong schools. Language Teaching Research 16(4). 483–499.
Brutt-Griffler, J. & K. K. Samimy. 2002) Transcending the nativeness paradigm. World Englishes 20 (1). 99–106.
Borg, M. 2004. Key concepts in ELT: The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal 58(3). 274–276.
Butler, Y. 2007. Factors associated with the notion that native speakers are ideal language teachers: An examination of elementary school teachers in Japan. JALT Journal 29(1). 7–40.
Cheng, S. F. 2011. A historical analysis of the Chinese and English tests of the joint college entrance examinations in Taiwan from 1954 to 2008. Indiana & Pennsylvania: Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Choi, I. 2008. The impact of EFL testing in EFL education in Korea. Language Testing 25(1). 39–62.
Chomsky, N. 1965. The aspects of theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foster, E. 1973. “Exam Hell” in Japan. Change 5(6). 16–19.
Galloway, N. 2009. A critical analysis of the JET Programme. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies 21. 169–207.6
Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & A. L. Strauss 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
Heyl, B. S. 2001. Ethnographic interviewing. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont & J. Lofland (eds.), Handbook of ethnography, 370–383. London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Hino, N. 1988. Nationalism and English as an international language: The history of English textbooks in Japan. World Englishes 7(3). 309–314. doi: [Crossref]
Kachru, B. 2005. Asian Englishes beyond the canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kitao, K. & S. Tanaka. 2009. Characteristics of Japanese junior high school English textbooks: From the viewpoint of vocabulary and readability. Journal of Culture and Information Science 4(1). 1–10.
Kubota, R. 2011. Learning a foreign language as leisure and consumption: Enjoyment, desire, and the business of Eikaiwa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14(4). 473–488.
Mahboob, A. 2010. The NNEST lens: Nonnative English speakers in TESOL. Newcastle: Hodder Arnold.
Matsuda, A. 2002. Representation of users and uses of English in beginning Japanese EFL textbooks. JALT Journal 24(2). 182–199.
Merriam, S. 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. & A. Huberman. 2013. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 3rd edn. London: Sage.
Mischler, E. 1986. Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Nishino, T. & M. Watanabe. 2008. Communication-oriented policies versus classroom realities in Japan. TESOL Quarterly 42(1). 133–138.
Phillipson, R. 1996. ELT: The native speaker’s burden. In T. Hedge & N. Whitney (eds.), Power, pedagogy & practice, 23–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tajima, M. 2011. Ideological messages embedded in an EFL textbook. In A. Stewart (ed.), JALT2010 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Yamanaka, N. 2006. An evaluation of English textbooks in japan from the viewpoint of nations in the inner, outer, and expanding circles. JALT Journal 28(1). 57–76.
About the article
Charles Allen Brown
Charles Allen Brown works as an associate professor in the Research Faculty of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies at Hokkaido University, Japan. In his research, he draws upon critical pedagogy and ethnographic methods to understand the social consequences – especially those involving relations of power – associated with the institution of English education in East Asia.
Published Online: 2017-01-06