Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.286

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Accomplishing “rapport” in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction

Matthew T. Prior
Published Online: 2017-05-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0029

Abstract

This study seeks to bring a more interactionally grounded perspective to the concept of “rapport” and its relevance for qualitative interviewing practices. Building on work within conversation analysis (CA), it respecifies rapport as affiliation and, more specifically, empathy. Analysis centers on case study data from an interview with an asylum seeker from the Philippines. It examines how interviewer and interviewee move in and out of empathic moments across the interview sequences as they manage their affective stances related to the events the interviewee describes and, in turn, by managing their empathic alignments with each other. These empathic moments share a number of features: they primarily come after response delays and the interviewee’s response pursuits, they are part of assessment sequences built by lexical reformulation and repetition, they entail stance matching and upgrading mainly through the use of prosodic resources, and they involve the interviewee asserting his primary rights to characterize and assess his own experiences. The article concludes by recommending more attention to the affiliative and empathic dimensions of qualitative interviewing.

Keywords: interviews; conversation analysis; rapport; empathy; emotion

References

  • Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Antaki, Charles. 2008. Formulations in psychotherapy. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen & Ivan Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, 26–42. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Paul. 2014. For ethnography. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Paul & David Silverman. 1997. Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry 3(3). 304–325.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Carolyn D. 2003. Ethnomethodological analyses of interviews. In James A. Holstein & Jaber F. Gubrium (eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, 395–412. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Baker, Carolyn D. 2004. Membership categorization and interview accounts. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 2nd edn., 162–176. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Bartesaghi, Mariaelena & Sheryl Perlmutter Bowen. 2009. The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity. Discourse Studies 11(2). 223–243.Google Scholar

  • Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano & Maurizio Viaro. 2008. Clients’ responses to therapists’ re-interpretations. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen & Ivan Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, 43–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bilmes, Jack. 2011. Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies 34. 129–153.Google Scholar

  • Bolden, Galina B. 2006. Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication 56. 661–688.Google Scholar

  • Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brumfit, Christopher J. 1995. Teacher professionalism and research. In Guy Cook & Barbara Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Burch, Alfred R. & Gabriele Kasper. 2016. ‘Like Godzilla’: Enactments and formulations in telling a disaster story in Japanese. In Matthew T. Prior & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction, 57–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Button, Graham (ed.). 1991. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012a. On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. Text & Talk 32(4). 453–475.Google Scholar

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012b. Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In Anssi Peräkylä & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), Emotion in interaction, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • De Fina, Anna & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, Derek & Jonathan Potter. 2004. Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In Hedwig Te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 241–259. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, Nancy & Janet Strayer. 1990. Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. Language 54. 787–815.Google Scholar

  • Goudy, Willis J. & Harry R. Potter. 1975. Interview rapport: Demise of a concept. The Public Opinion Quarterly 3(4). 529–543.Google Scholar

  • Gubrium, Jaber F. & Holstein, James A. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Gubrium, Jaber F., James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti & Karyn D. McKinney (eds.). 2012. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Hepburn, Alexa. 2004. Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37, 251–290.Google Scholar

  • Hepburn, Alexa & Jonathan Potter. 2007. Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction 40(1). 89–116.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John. 2011. Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John & Donald R. Watson. 1977. Recent developments in the sociology of language in Britain. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 8. 2–6.Google Scholar

  • Heritage, John & Donald R. Watson. 1979. Formulations as conversational objects. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar

  • Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3). 219–245.Google Scholar

  • Houtkoop-Steemstra, Hanneke. 1997. Being friendly in survey interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 28. 591–623.Google Scholar

  • Hutchby, Ian & Robin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 1973. A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag- positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9. 47–96.Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 1988. On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35(4). 418–441.Google Scholar

  • Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriele. 2015. Conducting interviews. In James Dean Brown & Christine Doombe (eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning, 209–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriele & Matthew T. Prior. 2015. “You said that?”: Other-initiations of repair address to represented talk. Text & Talk 35(6). 815–844.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Gabriele & Johannes Wagner. 2014. Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34. 171–212.Google Scholar

  • Koole, Tom. 2003. Affiliation and detachment in interviewer answer receipts. In Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell & Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra (eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview, 178–199. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kvale, Steinar & Svend Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Lindström, Anne & Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Affiliation in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 250–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Markee, Numa. 2000. Conversation analysis. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Elizabeth R. 2014. The language of adult immigrants: Agency in the making. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, Wendy & Annie Irvine. 2008. I’m okay, you’re okay?: Reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7(4). 31–44.Google Scholar

  • Nagy Hesse-Biber, Sharlene. (ed.). 2013. Feminist research practice: A primer. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Patton, Michael Quinn. 2015. Qualitative researcher and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th edn. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Pavlenko, Aneta. 2007. Autobiographical narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 28(2). 163–188.Google Scholar

  • Peräkylä, Anssi & Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pillow, Wanda. 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 162. 175–196.Google Scholar

  • Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan. 2012. Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In Harris Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, 111–130. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Derek Edwards 2013. Conversation analysis and psychology. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 701–725. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2005. Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative research in psychology 2. 281–307.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2012. Eight challenges for interview researchers. In Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti & Karyn D. McKinney (eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2nd edn., 555–570. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Potter, Jonathan & Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew. 2016. Emotion and discourse in L2 narrative research. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. 2011. Self-presentation in L2 interview talk: Narrative versions, accountability, and emotionality. Applied Linguistics 32(1). 60–76.Google Scholar

  • Prior, Matthew T. & Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 2016. Emotion in multilingual interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Rae, J. 2008. Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, 62–79. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rapley, Timothy. 2016. Questions of context: Qualitative interviews as a source of knowledge. In Cristian Tileagă & Elizabeth Stokoe (eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary Issues, 70–84. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Reis, Harry T. & Susan Sprecher. 2009. Encyclopedia of human relationships. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Richards, Keith. 2009. Interviews. In Juanita Heigham & Robert A. Croker (eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics, 182–199. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Roulston, Kathryn. 2010. Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Rubin, H. R. & I. S. Rubin 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, 3rd edn. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation (Volume II, Edited by Gail Jefferson). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Seidman, Irving. 2013. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, 4th edn. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Selting, Margret. 2010. Affectivity in conversational storytelling. An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics 202. 229–277.Google Scholar

  • Sidnell, Jack. & Tanya Stivers (eds.). 2013. The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Speer, Susan A. 2005. Gender talk: Feminism, discourse, and conversation analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Spradley, James P. 1979. The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

  • Stiles, William. 2008. Foreword. Filling the gaps. In Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen & Ivan Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, 1–4. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2005. Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2). 131–158.Google Scholar

  • Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Steven. 2010. Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. ARAL 30. 128–148.Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Steven & Keith Richards (eds.). 2011. Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: Discursive perspectives [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics 32(1). 1–128.Google Scholar

  • Terasaki, Alene K. 2004[1976]. Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Tileagă, Cristian & Elizabeth Stokoe. 2016. Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • van den Berg, Harry, Margaret Wetherell & Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra (eds.). 2003. Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Weiss, Carl H. 1970. Interaction in the research interview: The effects of rapport on response. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Social Statistics, 1960, 17–20. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar

  • Wilce, James. 2003. Eloquence in trouble: The poetics and politics of complaint in rural Bangladesh. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wilkinson, Sue & Celia Kitzinger. 2006. Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychological Quarterly 692. 150–182.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-05


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0029.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in