Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.286

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Metalinguistic discourse on multilingual urban and youth speech styles and multilingual awareness and linguistic practices – Guest editors Dorleijn & Nortier

Margreet Dorleijn / Jacomine Nortier
Published Online: 2017-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0048

References

  • Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, John K. 1995. Sociolinguistic theory. Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gal, Susan & Judith Irvine. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Google Scholar

  • Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Zellig. 1991. A theory of language and information: A mathematical approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Irvine, Judith. 2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

  • Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland & Dariuzs Galasinski (eds.). 2004. Metalanguage: Social and historical perspectives. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Johnstone, Barbara. 2011. Language and place. In Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kristiansen, Tore. 2004. Social meaning and norm-ideals for speech in a Danish community. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariuzs Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and historical perspectives, 167–192. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Lemon, Alaina Maria. 2002. “Form” and “function” in Soviet Stage Romani: Modeling metapragmatics through performance institutions. Language in Society 31. 29–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, Jian. 2011. Deviant writing and youth identity: Representation of dialects with Chinese characters on the internet. Chinese Language & Discourse 2(1). 58–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nortier, Jacomine & Margreet Dorleijn. 2008. A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2). 125–142.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preston, Dennis. 2004. Folk metalanguage. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariuzs Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and historical perspectives, 75–101. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul Clyne, William Hanks & Carol Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and level, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stroop, Jan (ed.). 2003. Waar gaat het Nederlands naar toe? [What will happen to the Dutch language?] Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

  • Verschueren, Jef. 2004. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariuzs Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and historical perspectives, 53–74. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Woolard, Kathryn. 2008. Why dat now? Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 432–452.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-27


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0048.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in