Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.351

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

English for sale: Using race to create value in the Korean ELT market

Christopher Jenks
Published Online: 2017-11-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0090

Abstract

Using Marxist notions of value, this study examines how the commodification of language instruction skews understandings of who is deemed a legitimate teacher of English in South Korea. The study argues that neoliberalism incentivizes the Korean ELT market to create value in race and racialized images. For example, the analysis explores how skin color, nationality, ethnicity, and facial morphology are used to sell an “authentic” and “Western” learning experience, thus creating exchange value in characteristics and features that are not traditionally associated with good language teaching, such as the ability to communicate information effectively. Analyzing interviews, job advertisements, and immigration documents from a critical discourse analytic perspective, the analysis uncovers how a market-driven ELT profession contributes to, and represents, a nexus of racially-motivated ideologies that circulates the discourse that English in South Korea is an indispensable form of upward mobility. The paper ends by contending that scholars and practitioners must do more to understand how constructs central to markets, such as value and commodity, shed light on pressing critical ELT issues.

Keywords: race; ethnicity; Marxism; neoliberalism; commodification; language teaching

References

  • Appleby, R. 2013. Desire in translation: White masculinity and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 47. 122–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, K. 1994. Selling the self: Women and the feminine seduction of advertising. Women and Language 17. 20–25.Google Scholar

  • Block, D. 2017. Political economy in applied linguistics research. Language Teaching 50. 32–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Block, D., J. Gray & M. Holborow. 2012. Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bruthiaux, P. 2008. Dimensions of globalization and applied linguistics. In P. Tan & R. Rubdy (eds.), Language as commodity: Global structures, local marketplaces, 1–30. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, D. 2012. The commodification of language: English as a global commodity. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 352–361. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chun, C.W. 2016. Addressing racialized multicultural discourses in an EAP textbook: Working toward a critical pedagogies approach. TESOL Quarterly 50. 109–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Copley, K. 2017. Neoliberalism and ELT Coursebook Content. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delgado, R. & J. Stefancic. 2012. Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Duchêne, A. & M. Heller. 2012. Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Education First. 2013. South Korea: Massive investment with limited return. Cambridge, MA: EF Education First.Google Scholar

  • Flores, N. 2013. The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly 47. 500–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flubacher, M. & A. Del Percio. 2017. Language, education and neoliberalism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Foucault, M. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. (M. Senellart, Ed./G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Gao, S. 2016. Interactional straining and the neoliberal self: Learning English in the biggest English corner in China. Language in Society 45. 397–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. 2010. The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English language textbooks. Applied Linguistics 31. 714–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, M. 2010. The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 39. 101–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, J.H. 1998. Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist 100. 680–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holborow, M. 2006. Language and ideology: Interconnections between English and neo-liberalism. In J. Edge (ed.), (Re)Locating TESOL in the age of empire, 84–103. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Holborow, M. 2007. Language, ideology and neoliberalism. Journal of Language and Politics 6. 51–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holborow, M. 2016. Language and neoliberalism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hyams, J. 2015. Chungdahm April under fire for ‘white only’ recruitment ad. The Korea Observer. www.koreaobserver.com/chung-dahm-under-fire-foremploying-whites-only-27547/ (Accessed 14 July 2017).

  • Jenks, C. J. 2017. Race and ethnicity in ELT: Korea in focus. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Jeon, H. 2006. The economics of English. Seoul, KR: Samsung Economic Research Institute.Google Scholar

  • Kim, M. 2017. Political economy and activity theory analysis of ideologies of English in Korean labor markets. Paper presented at Korean Association of Teachers of English Conference. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar

  • Kim, S. & J. Lee. 2010. Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58. 259–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubota, R. 2015. Introduction: Race and language learning in multicultural Canada. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 36. 1–2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubota, R. 2016. The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 37. 474–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, T. 2014. American rejected for job in Korea because of being black. The Korea Observer. http://www.koreaobserver.com/american-rejected-for-job-inkorea-because-of-being-black-24676 (Accessed 14 July 2017).

  • Leong, N. 2013. Racial capitalism. Harvard Law Review 126. 2151–2226.Google Scholar

  • Lury, C. 2004. Brands: The logos of the global economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mahboob, A. 2009. Racism in the English language teaching industry. In A. Mahboob & C. Lipovsky (eds.), Studies in applied linguistics and language learning, 29–40. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Mahboob, A. & R. Golden. 2013. Looking for native speakers of English: Discrimination in English language teaching job advertisements. Voices in Asia Journal 1. 72–81.Google Scholar

  • Marx, K. 1867. Capital (Vol. 1). (S. Moore & E. Aveling, Trans.). Hamburg: Verlag von Otto Meissner.Google Scholar

  • Ministry of Justice, Korea Immigration Service. 2015. Visa Instruction Guide. Seoul, South Korea: Ministry of Justice, Korea Immigration Service.Google Scholar

  • Moon, G. 2009. Statistics paint Korean picture. Korea JoongAng Daily. http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2913964 (Accessed 9 July 2017).

  • Motha, S. 2014. Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

  • Park, J. K. 2009a. ‘English fever’ in South Korea: Its history and symptoms. English Today 25. 50–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, J. S. 2009b. The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Park, J. S. 2013. English, class and neoliberalism in South Korea. In L. Wee, R. B. Goh & L. Lim (eds.), The Politics of English: South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific, 287–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Richards, T. 1990. The commodity culture of Victorian English: Advertising and spectacle, 1851-1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ruecker, T. & L. Ives. 2015. White native English speakers needed: The rhetorical construction of privilege in online teacher recruitment spaces. TESOL Quarterly 49. 733–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schroeder, L. 2011. Racial preference for white English teachers prevalent in Korea. Yonhap News Agency. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/n_feature/2011/04/04/99/4901000000AEN20110404002300315F.HTML. (Accessed 14 July 2017).

  • Seth, M. J. 2002. Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press and Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaiʻi.Google Scholar

  • Song, J. 2009. Between flexible life and flexible labor: The inadvertent convergence of socialism and neoliberalism in South Korea. Critique of Anthropology 29. 139–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spencer, S. 2006. Race and ethnicity: Culture, identity and representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Strother, J. 2007. Ethnic bias seen in South Korea teacher hiring. NPR. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11826937 (Accessed 14 July 2017).

  • Takahashi, K. 2013. Language learning, gender and desire: Japanese women on the move. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Tan, P.K.W. & R. Rubdy. 2008. Language as commodity: Global structures, local marketplace. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • TESOL. 2012. A principles-based approach for English language teaching policies and practices: A TESOL white paper. TESOL. http://www.tesol.org/docs/pdf/a-principles-based-approach-for-english-language-teaching-policies-and-practices-.pdf?sfvrsn=0 (Accessed 23 July 2017).

  • Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R. & M. Meyer. 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-11-17


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0090.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in