Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.351

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Integrating Linguistic Theory and Experimentation in L2 Acquisition: Learning of Spanish Differential Object Marking by Portuguese and English speakers

Will NedigerORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-3140 / Acrisio Pires / Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
Published Online: 2017-10-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0094

Abstract

This paper focuses on consequences for linguistic theory of a set of experiments on the L2 acquisition of Spanish Differential Object Marking (DOM), with three experimental groups: a native control group, a group of L2 learners whose L1 is English, and a group of L2 learners whose L1 is Brazilian Portuguese (BP). The results of the experiments shed light on two questions of theoretical import: (a) how best to characterize the syntax of Spanish DOM, and (b) whether BP should be classified as a DOM language. We argue that our results support López’s (2012, Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) syntactic theory account of DOM over that of Torrego (1998, The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), in particular due to the more fine-grained distinctions between non-specific objects made by López (2012) compared to Torrego (1998). We also argue that although BP is a DOM language (as suggested by Schwenter 2014, Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Patricia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 237–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins), our BP subjects do not show a clear acquisitional advantage over English speakers with regard to Spanish DOM, due to independent reasons that include the morphological realization of DOM in Spanish.

Keywords: Differential Object Marking; L2 acquisition; Spanish; English; Brazilian Portuguese

References

  • Blas-Arroyo, José Luis. 2007. Spanish and Catalan in the Balearic Islands. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 184. 79–93.Google Scholar

  • Borgonovo, Claudia, Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Philippe Prévost & Elena Valenzuela. 2006. Specificity in Spanish: The syntax/semantics interface in SLA. EUROSLA Yearbook 6. 57–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bossong, Georg. 1985. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Choi, Myong-hee & Donna Lardiere. 2006. The interpretation of wh-in-situ in Korean second language acquisition. In Adriana Belletti, Elisa Bennati, Cristiano Chesi, Elisa Di Domenico & Ida Ferrari (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005, 125–135. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

  • Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2009. Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language 33. 832–885.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro. 2011. Feature composition in differential object marking. EUROSLA Yearbook 11. 138–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro. 2012. The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15. 701–720.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro and Theodoros Marinis. 2007. Acquiring interface phenomena in L2 Spanish: The personal preposition a. In Leah Roberts, Ayşe Gürel, Sibel Tatar & Leyla Martı (eds.), EUROSLA yearbook, 7, 67–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Lardiere, Donna. 2008. Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In Juana Liceras, Helmut Zobl & Helen Goodluck (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, 106–140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Lardiere, Donna. 2009. Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 25. 173–227.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Montrul, Silvina. 2014. Searching for the roots of structural changes in the Spanish of the United States. Lingua 151. 177–196.Google Scholar

  • Montrul, Silvina & Melissa Bowles. 2009. Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12. 363–383.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Montrul, Silvina & Melissa Bowles. 2010. Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners? Dative case marking in Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 7. 47–73.Google Scholar

  • Montrul, Silvina & Noelia Sánchez-Walker. 2013. Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition 20. 109–132.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nediger, Will, Acrisio Pires & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes. 2016. Variable L2 acquisition of spanish differential object marking by L1 English speakers. In Jennifer Scott & Deb Waughtal (eds.), BUCLD 40 online proceedings supplement. http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2016/09/NedigerPiresGF16DOML2SpanishEnglishL1_BUProc_Final.pdf.

  • Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2008. The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus 20. 111–145.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schwenter, Scott. 2014. Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Patricia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 237–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ticio, Emma. 2015. Differential object marking in Spanish-English early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5. 62–90.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Torrego, Esther. 2002. Aspect in the prepositional system of Romance. In Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds.), Current issues in Romance languages, 337–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg Kaiser. 2007. Differential Object Marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. In Georg Kaiser & Manuel Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages”, 85–110. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-28


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0094.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in