Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.286

See all formats and pricing
More options …

“So, why do you sign?” Deaf and hearing new signers, their motivation, and revitalisation policies for sign languages

Maartje De Meulder
Published Online: 2018-04-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0100


  • Albert, Bickford, J, M. Paul Lewis & Gary F Simons. 2015. Rating the vitality of sign languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 36(5). 513–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Austin, Peter K & Julia Sallabank. 2014. Introduction. In Peter K Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Endangered languages. Beliefs and ideologies in language documentation and revitalisation, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bauman, H. Dirksen & Joseph J Murray. 2017. Sign languages. In Ofelia García, Nelson Flores & Maximiliano Spotti (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society, 243–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2013. Inventing the native speaker. Critical Multilingualism Studies 1(2). 29–58.Google Scholar

  • Boyes-Braem, Penny & Christian Rathmann. 2010. Transmission of sign languages in Northern Europe. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Cambridge language surveys: Sign languages, 19–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bruin, Marieke & Anne Nevøy. 2014. Exploring the discourse on communication modality after cochlear implantation: A Foucauldian analysis of parents’ narratives. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 19(1). 385–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busch, Brigitta. 2015. Expanding the notion of the linguistic repertoire: On the concept of Spracherleben—the lived experience of language. Applied Linguistics 38(3). 340–358.Google Scholar

  • Carty, Breda. 2006. Comments on “W(h)ither the Deaf Community?.” Sign Language Studies 6(2). 181–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, James. 2014. Must we save the language? Children’s discourse on language and community in Provençal and Scottish language revitalisation movements. In Peter K Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Endangered languages, 195–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Costello, Brendan, Javier Fernández & Alazne Landa. 2008. The non-(existent) native signer: Sign language research in a small deaf population. In Ronice Müller De Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 77–94. Florianopolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar

  • Cowell, Andrew. 2016. Language maintenance and revitalisation. In Nancy Bonvillain (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 420–432. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • De Meulder, Maartje & Joseph J Murray. 2017. Buttering their bread on both sides? The recognition of sign languages and the aspirations of deaf communities. Language Problems & Language Planning 41(2). 136–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • diMarco, Nyle. 2017. Representation matters: Why deaf actors should play deaf characters. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adAD4X1ri7w [last accessed 19 February 2018].

  • Edwards, John. 1992. Sociopolitical aspects of language maintenance and loss: Towards a typology of minority language situations. In Willem Fase, Koen Jaspaert & Sjaak Kroon (eds.), Maintenance and loss of minority languages, 37–54. Philadelphia: J Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Ellcessor, Elizabeth. 2015. Is there a sign for that? Media, American Sign Language interpretation, and the paradox of visibility. Perspectives 23(4). 586–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Grin, François. 2003. Language policy evaluation and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Heller, Monica, Sari Pietikäinen & Joan Pujolar. 2018. Critical sociolinguistic research methods. Studying language issues that matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Joseph. 2013. Language ideologies, policies, and attitudes towards signed languages. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron & Ceil Lucas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 680–697. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Humphries, Tom, Poorna Kushalnagar, Gaurav Mathur, Donna Jo Napoli, Carol Padden, Christian Rathmann & Scott Smith. 2017. Discourses of prejudice in the professions: The case of sign languages. Journal of Medical Ethics 0(1). 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Jaeger, Hannah. 2017. Modality matters: On social forces determining what is standard in German Sign Language (DGS). Linguistik Online 81(2). 45–58.Google Scholar

  • Johnston, Trevor. 2006. W(h)ither the deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 6(2). 137–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kramsch, Claire. 2009. The multilingual subject. What language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Krausneker, Verena. 2015. Ideologies and attitudes towards sign languages: An approximation. Sign Language Studies 15(4). 411–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder & Dai O’Brien (eds.). 2017a. Innovations in Deaf Studies: The role of deaf scholars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kusters, Annelies, Maximiliano Spotti, Ruth Swanwick & Elina Tapio. 2017b. Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 2. 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Ladd, Paddy. 1979. Making plans for Nigel: The erosion of identity by mainstreaming. In Gerrard Montgomery (ed.), The integration and disintegration of the deaf in society. Edinburgh: Scottish Workshop Publications.Google Scholar

  • Ladd, Paddy. 2003. Understanding deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Lane, Harlan, Robert Hoffmeister & Ben Bahan. 1996. A journey into the Deaf-World. San Diego, CA: DawnSign Press.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, Huw & Elin Royles. 2017. Language revitalisation and social transformation: Evaluating the language policy frameworks of sub-state governments in Wales and Scotland. Policy & Politics. First published online 9(May). 2017. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liddicoat, Anthony. 2016. Native and non-native speaker identities in interaction: Trajectories of power. Applied Linguistics Review 7(4). 409–429.Google Scholar

  • Makoni, Sinfree & Alastair Pennycook. 2005. Disinventing and (re)constituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 2(3). 137–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKee, Rachel. 2011. Action Pending: Four Years on from the New Zealand Sign Language Act. VUW Law Review 42(2). 277–298.Google Scholar

  • McKee, Rachel. 2017. Assessing the vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 17(3). 322–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKee, Rachel & Kirsten Smiler. 2017. Family language policy for deaf children and the vitality of New Zealand Sign Language. In John Macalister & Seyed Hadi Mirvahedi (eds.), Family language policies in a multilingual world, 30–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, Ross E. & Michael A Karchmer. 2004. Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2). 138–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, Joseph J., Maartje De Meulder & le Maire Delphine. 2018. An Education in Sign Language as a Human Right? The Sensory Exception in the Legislative History and On-Going Interpretation of Article 24 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Quarterly 40. 37–60.Google Scholar

  • Napier, Jemina & Lorraine Leeson (eds.). 2016. Sign language in action. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Neidle, Carol & Joan Cottle Poole Nash. 2015. American Sign Language. In Jullie Bakken Jepsen, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo Kiingi & William B McGregor (eds.), Sign Languages of the World, 31–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Bernadette, Joan Pujolar & Fernando Ramallo. 2015. New speakers of minority languages: The challenging opportunity. Foreword. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231. 1–20.Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Bernadette & Fernando Ramallo. 2013. Competing ideologies of linguistic authority amongst new speakers in contemporary Galicia. Language in Society 42(3). 287–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Bernadette & Fernando Ramallo. 2015. Neofalantes as an active minority: understanding language practices and motivations for change amongst new speakers of Galician. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231. 147–165.Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Bernadette & John Walsh. 2015. New speakers of Irish: Shifting boundaries across time and space. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231. 63–83.Google Scholar

  • Padden, Carol & Tom Humphries. 1988. Deaf in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pizer, Ginger, Keith Walters & Richard P Meier. 2007. Bringing Up Baby with Baby Signs: Language Ideologies and Socialization in Hearing Families. Sign Language Studies 7(4). 387–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Puigdevall, Maite, John Walsh, Estibaliz Amorrortu & Ane Ortega. 2018. “I”ll be one of them’: Linguistic mudes and new speakers in three minority language contexts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 10(4). 1–13.Google Scholar

  • Pujolar, Joan & Maite Puigdevall. 2015. Linguistic mudes: How to become a new speaker in Catalonia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231. 167–187.Google Scholar

  • Rosa, Jonathan & Christa Burdick. 2016. Language ideologies. In Ofelia García, Nelson Flores & Maximiliano Spotti (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, 103–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Safar, Josefina & Jenny Webster. 2014. Cataloguing endangered sign languages at iSLanDS. Unpublished report. https://islandscentre.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/report-endangered-sls_070814.pdf

  • Sallabank, Julia. 2013. Attitudes to Endangered Languages. Identities and Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sarivaara, Erika, Satu Uusiautti & Määttä Kaarina. 2013. How to Revitalize an Indigenous Language? Adults’ Experiences of the Revitalization of the Sámi Language. Cross-Cultural Communication 9(1). 13–21.Google Scholar

  • Snoddon, Kristin. 2014. Baby sign as deaf gain. In H-Dirksen L. Bauman & Joseph J Murray (eds.), Deaf Gain. Raising the stakes for human diversity, 146–158. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Snoddon, Kristin. 2016. Whose ASL counts? Linguistic prescriptivism and challenges in the context of parent sign language curriculum development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1228599

  • Snoddon, Kristin. 2017. Uncovering translingual practices in teaching parents classical ASL varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 7(3). 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2003. Reassessing Mãori regeneration. Language in Society 32(4). 553–578.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2014. Language Beliefs and the Management of Endangered Languages. In Peter K Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), Endangered Languages, 407–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Bernard. 2017. “Shikl, what did you do for Yiddish today?” An appreciation of activist scholarship. The International Journal of the Sociology of Language 243. 29–38.Google Scholar

  • Sutton-Spence, Rachel. 2010. The role of sign language narratives in developing identity for deaf children. Journal of Folklore Research 47(3). 265–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Svartholm, Kristina. 2014. 35 years of bilingual education - and then? Educar em Revista (spe-2), pp. 33–50. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-40602014000600004&script=sci_abstract.doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.37013

  • Swinbourne, Charlie. 2015. Found. Available at http://www.bslzone.co.uk/watch/found/[last accessed 18 February 2018].

  • Takkinen, Ritva. 2017. Bimodal bilingual language acquisition and language usage in deaf children using a cochlear implant. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Minority Languages, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, 28 August.Google Scholar

  • Thieberger, Nicolas. 2002. Extinction in Whose Terms? Which parts of a language constitute a target for language maintenance programs?. In David Bradley & May Bradley (eds.), Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance. An Active Approach, 310–328. London: Curzon.Google Scholar

  • UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages. 2003. Language Vitality and Endangerment. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

  • Vertovec, Steven. 2007. Super-Diversity and its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6). 1024–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walsh, John. 2017. The role of emotions and positionality in the trajectories of ‘new speakers’ of Irish. International Journal of Bilingualism 00(0). 1–15.Google Scholar

  • Walsh, John & Noel Ó Murchadha. 2014. New speakers in a multilingual Europe: Opportunities and Challenges. Position paper on research themes and profiles related to new speakers of indigenous minority languages. Output of Working Group 1. http://www.nspk.org.uk/images/WG_1.pdf

  • Weber, Joanne. Forthcoming. Interrogating sign language ideologies in the Saskatchewan deaf community: An autoethnography. In Annelies Kusters, Mara Green, Erin Moriarty Harrelson & Kristin Snoddon (eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • West, Donna. 2013. Signs of hope: Deafhearing family life. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Woll, Bencie & Robert Adam. 2012. Sign language and the politics of deafness. In Marilyn Martin-Jones, Adrian Blackledge & Angela Creese (eds).), The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, 100–115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-14

Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0100.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in