Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.351

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Doing ethnography among Latinos in London and Barcelona: languages, genders, and ethnicities

Victor Corona / Sophie Kelsall
Published Online: 2018-04-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0123

Abstract

Based on two ethnographic studies of people of Latin American descent in global cities, this article explores how language, gender, and ethnicity shape field relations, community membership, and data collection. It examines some of the implications of being positioned intersectionally as an outsider or insider of the community, and being sexualised by a male gatekeeper. It suggests that gender roles are a powerful aspect of conducting ethnographic research among Latinos, while pointing to the challenge of dealing with, and potentially contributing to, essentialising discourses in the field. It argues that the notion of ‘being Latino’ is imagined and constructed interactionally and contextually, in reaction to social pressures, as well as local and historical narratives.

Keywords: access; field relations; gatekeeper; positionality; intersectionality

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas press.Google Scholar

  • Ballamingie, Patricia & Sherrill Johnson. 2011. The vulnerable researcher: Some unanticipated challenges of doctoral fieldwork. The Qualitative Report 16(3). 711–729.Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, Basil. 1988. Clases, Códigos y Control. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar

  • Block, David. 2008. The increasing presence of spanish-speaking Latinos in London: An emergent community? Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 7. 5–21.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Imogen & Andrea Grant. 2015. Sexuality and danger in the field : Starting an uncomfortable conversation. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford Online VII(1). 1–14. https://www.isca.ox.ac.uk/publications/jaso/previous-issues/jasoonline-2011/ (accessed 24 November 2015).

  • Crowhurst, Isabel. 2013. The fallacy of the instrumental gate? Contextualising the process of gaining access through gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(6). 463–475.Google Scholar

  • Crowhurst, Isabel & madeleine Kennedy-Macfoy. 2013. Troubling gatekeepers: Methodological considerations for social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(6). 457–462.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Les Rites d’Interaction. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1987. Façons De Parler. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

  • Heller, Monica. 2002. Éléments d’une sociolingüistique critique. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar

  • Kelsall, Sophie. 2012. Latinidad in London: An ethnographic study exploring how Latin American Londoners represent their ethnic community discursively. London: King’s College London PhD thesis.Google Scholar

  • Kennedy-Macfoy, Madeleine. 2013. ‘It’s important for the students to meet someone like you.’ How perceptions of the researcher can affect gaining access, building rapport and securing cooperation in school-based research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(6). 491–502.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1982. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • McIlwaine, Cathy. 2007. Living in Latin London: How Latin American migrants survive in the city. Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar

  • McIlwaine, Cathy, Juan Camilo Cock & Brian Linneker. 2011. No longer invisible: The Latin American community in London. Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar

  • Mügge, Liza M. 2013. Sexually harassed by gatekeepers: Reflections on fieldwork in Surinam and Turkey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(6). 541–546.Google Scholar

  • Olivier de Sardan, Jean Pierre. 1995. La politique du terrain, Enquête [online], 1 | 1995, online on 10 July 2013, consulted on 17 April 2016. http://enquete.revues.org/263

  • Reeves, Carla L. 2010. A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research 10(3). 315–331.Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-04-14


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0123.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in