Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Linguistics Review

Editor-in-Chief: Wei, Li


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.098
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.871

Online
ISSN
1868-6311
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Entrenchment and productivity: The role of input in the code-mixing of a German-English bilingual child

Antje Endesfelder Quick / Stefan Hartmann / Ad Backus / Elena Lieven
Published Online: 2019-05-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0027

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of input in the code-mixing (CM) of a German-English bilingual child between the age of 2;3 until 3;11. Supporting a usage-based approach to linguistic theory, multiword units are shown to play an important role in language acquisition scenarios, both in the input children receive as well as in their own early language production.

The current study combines findings from Child-directed-speech (CDS) and children’s output to investigate whether utterance-initial, multiword units in the code-mixing of a German-English bilingual child can be traced back to patterns found in the input.

The findings reveal that a large proportion of the child code-mixed (78%) and parental input (59%) data instantiate the selection of multiword units. Additionally, we found that many of the units used by the child (74%) correlate with units in the parental input suggesting that bilingual children construct their code-mixed utterances on the basis of both concrete lexical strings and partially schematic patterns they have heard before.

Keywords: code-mixing; usage-based approach; multiword units; role of input; traceback

References

  • Ambridge, Ben & Elena Lieven. 2011. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bannard, Colin, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Modeling children’s early grammaticalnknowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106(41). 17284–17289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bannard, Colin & Danielle Matthews. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Sycience 19(3). 241–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bialystok, Ellen. 2001. Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6). 843–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantone, Katja F. 2007. Code-switching in bilingual children. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Clark, Eve V. 2009. First language acquisition. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3). 437–474.Google Scholar

  • De Houwer, Annick. 2007. Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(3). 411–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deuchar, Margaret. 1999. Are function words non-language-specific in early bilingual two-word utterances? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(1). 23–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Di Sciullo, Anne-Marie, Pieter Muysken & Rajendra Sing. 1986. Government and code-mixing. Journal of Linguistics 22. 1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grosjean, François. 1982. Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kirjavainen, Minna, Anna L. Theakston & Elena Lieven. 2009. Can input explain children’s me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language 36(5). 1091–1114. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lieven, Elena. 2014. First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41(S1). 48–63.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieven, Elena, Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares & Michael Tomasello. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30. 333–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieven, Elena, Dorothé Salomo & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3). 481–508.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • MacSwan, Jeff. 1999. A minimalist approach to intrasentential code switching. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, Lesley & Pieter Muysken. 1995. One speaker, two languages: Crossdisciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1997. Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in code-switching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, Joanne. 2000. Beyond ‘one system or two’: Degrees of separation between the languages of French-English bilingual children. In S. Döpke (ed.), Crosslinguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism, 175–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, Joanne, Elena Nicoladis & Fred Genesee. 2000. Early emergence of structural constraints on codemixing: Evidence from French–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3. 245–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poplack, Shanna. 1980. Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPANOL’: Toward a typology of code - switching. Linguistics 18. 581–618.Google Scholar

  • Quick, Endesfelder Antje, Elena Lieven, Malinda Carpenter & Michael Tomasello. 2018. Identifying partially schematic units in the code-mixing of an English and German speaking child. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(4). 477–501. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, 9–39. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Serratrice, Ludovica. 2013. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual development: Determinants and mechanisms. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(1). 5–27.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stoll, Sabine, Kirsten Abbot-Smith & Elena Lieven. 2009. Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child directed speech. Cognitive Science 33. 75–103.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Theakston, Anna & Elena Lieven. 2017. Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3). 588–603. doi:.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, M. & Daniel Stahl. 2004. Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31. 101–121. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2000. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74(3). 209–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-05-21


Citation Information: Applied Linguistics Review, ISSN (Online) 1868-6311, ISSN (Print) 1868-6303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0027.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in